Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move LD facilities into /ecom #282

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

devinmorgan
Copy link
Contributor

@devinmorgan devinmorgan commented Jun 24, 2024

What

  • Moves LDManager and related LaunchDarkly functionality from the core services to the Ecom services.

Why

Only the Ecom repo uses LD. To reflect this truth, the LD service needs to live in /ecom instead of /core

Test Plan

  • ✅ Unit tests have been updated
  • ❌ Passing CI tests and unit tests are sufficient

Demo

N/A just implementation details

How

I've marked this PR to merge when ready

Copy link
Contributor Author

devinmorgan commented Jun 24, 2024

@devinmorgan devinmorgan changed the base branch from devin/rename-forage-sub-dir-to-rosetta to main June 24, 2024 18:08
devinmorgan and others added 2 commits June 27, 2024 08:11
The Pos SDK does not use these; in fact we dropped LD from the Pos repo
a long time ago
@devinmorgan devinmorgan force-pushed the devin/move-ld-service-to-ecom branch from 12e3223 to 38844f8 Compare June 27, 2024 12:11
@devinmorgan devinmorgan requested a review from djoksimo July 9, 2024 19:04
@devinmorgan devinmorgan merged commit 974ff8e into main Jul 9, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merge activity

devinmorgan added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2025
* Move LD facilities into /ecom

The Pos SDK does not use these; in fact we dropped LD from the Pos repo
a long time ago

* Make temp polling variable internal
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants