Added Backend Route for Café Reservation Form and .env Configuration #42
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Thank you for submitting your pull request! 🙌 We'll review it as soon as possible. In the meantime, please ensure that your changes align with our CONTRIBUTING.md. If there are any specific instructions or feedback regarding your PR, we'll provide them here. Thanks again for your contribution! 😊 |
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@RamakrushnaBiswal , why did the deployement failed? |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
backend/models/reservation.model.js (1)
1-21: Overall assessment: Functional but with room for improvementThe
reservation.model.jsfile successfully defines a Mongoose schema for reservations and creates a corresponding model. While the implementation is functional, there are opportunities to enhance data integrity, type safety, and adherence to naming conventions, particularly in the schema definition.Consider implementing the suggested improvements to the schema to make the model more robust and easier to work with in the long term. These changes will help prevent potential issues with data consistency and improve the overall quality of the reservation system.
backend/index.js (1)
9-9: Consider restricting CORS policy to specific originsUsing
app.use(cors({}))enables CORS for all origins by default, which could expose the server to unwanted cross-origin requests. If the application is intended to be accessed only from specific origins, consider specifying allowed origins in the CORS configuration.Apply this diff to restrict CORS to specific origins:
+const allowedOrigins = ['http://yourdomain.com', 'http://anotherdomain.com']; +app.use(cors({ + origin: allowedOrigins +})); -app.use(cors({}));frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (3)
13-23: Remove unnecessaryuseEffecthooks logging state changesThe
useEffecthooks on lines 13-23 are loggingGuests,Date, andTimeto the console whenever these variables change. If this logging is intended for debugging purposes, consider removing theseuseEffecthooks before deploying to production to avoid cluttering the console.
Line range hint
84-134: AttachhandleSubmitto the form'sonSubmiteventCurrently, the
handleSubmitfunction is attached to theonClickevent of the submit button. To ensure that form submission is handled correctly in all cases (including when the user presses the Enter key), attach thehandleSubmitfunction to the form'sonSubmitevent instead.Apply this diff to attach
handleSubmitto the form and remove it from the button:- <form className="grid gap-4"> + <form className="grid gap-4" onSubmit={handleSubmit}>- <button - className="inline-flex items-center justify-center p-4 bg-[#D9D9D9] hover:bg-[#C9C9C9]" - type="submit" - onClick={handleSubmit} - > + <button + className="inline-flex items-center justify-center p-4 bg-[#D9D9D9] hover:bg-[#C9C9C9]" + type="submit" + >
143-144: Adjust heading semantics for accessibilityThe heading "Popular Board Games" is wrapped in an
<h1>tag at lines 143-144. Since there is already an<h1>used elsewhere on the page, consider using an<h2>or<h3>to maintain proper heading hierarchy, which is important for accessibility and SEO.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- backend/controller/reservation.controller.js (1 hunks)
- backend/index.js (1 hunks)
- backend/models/reservation.model.js (1 hunks)
- backend/package.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx
[error] 10-10: Do not shadow the global "Date" property.
Consider renaming this variable. It's easy to confuse the origin of variables when they're named after a known global.
(lint/suspicious/noShadowRestrictedNames)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
backend/package.json (1)
13-14: LGTM: New dependencies align with PR objectivesThe addition of
cors,dotenv, andmongoosepackages aligns well with the PR objectives. These will enable cross-origin requests, environment variable management, and MongoDB integration respectively.Also applies to: 16-16
backend/controller/reservation.controller.js (2)
1-1: LGTM: Proper import of the Reservation model.The import statement correctly imports the Reservation model from the appropriate relative path.
12-14: LGTM: Proper module exports.The
createReservationfunction is correctly exported, allowing for easy importing and use in other parts of the application. The object structure also allows for easy addition of more functions in the future if needed.backend/models/reservation.model.js (2)
1-3: LGTM: Proper Mongoose setupThe import statement and Schema extraction are correctly implemented, following standard Mongoose usage.
19-21: LGTM: Proper model creation and exportThe Reservation model is correctly created using the defined schema and properly exported for use in other parts of the application.
backend/index.js (1)
22-22: Verify thatcreateReservationhandles input validation and error handlingTo ensure the security and reliability of the
/create-reservationendpoint, please verify that thecreateReservationfunction includes appropriate input validation and error handling to prevent injection attacks and application crashes.Run the following script to check for input validation in
createReservation:
| async function createReservation(req, res) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const reservation = await Reservation.create(req.body); | ||
| res.status(201).json(reservation); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| res.status(400).json({ message: error.message }); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding input validation and enhancing error handling.
While the overall structure of the createReservation function is correct, there are a few areas that could be improved:
-
Data Validation: Currently,
req.bodyis passed directly toReservation.create(). This could lead to security vulnerabilities if the input is not properly validated. -
Error Handling: The current error handling is basic. Consider adding more specific error handling for different types of errors (e.g., validation errors, database errors).
-
Response Security: Sending the entire reservation object in the response might expose sensitive data. Consider returning only necessary information.
Here's a suggested improvement:
const Reservation = require("../models/reservation.model");
const { validateReservation } = require("../utils/validation"); // Assume this exists
async function createReservation(req, res) {
try {
const { error, value } = validateReservation(req.body);
if (error) {
return res.status(400).json({ message: error.details[0].message });
}
const reservation = await Reservation.create(value);
res.status(201).json({
message: "Reservation created successfully",
id: reservation._id,
date: reservation.date
});
} catch (error) {
if (error.name === 'ValidationError') {
return res.status(400).json({ message: error.message });
}
console.error('Error creating reservation:', error);
res.status(500).json({ message: "An error occurred while creating the reservation" });
}
}This suggestion includes input validation, more specific error handling, and a more secure response. Make sure to implement the validateReservation function in a separate utility file.
| const Reservation = require("../models/reservation.model"); | ||
|
|
||
| async function createReservation(req, res) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const reservation = await Reservation.create(req.body); | ||
| res.status(201).json(reservation); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| res.status(400).json({ message: error.message }); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| module.exports = { | ||
| createReservation, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Missing .env file for environment configuration.
The project utilizes dotenv and accesses environment variables such as process.env.MONGO_URI but does not include a .env file in the repository. Please ensure that environment variables are properly configured, either by adding a .env file with the necessary variables or by configuring them through your deployment environment.
- Action Required: Add a
.envfile with the required environment variables or verify that environment variables are set through your deployment process.
🔗 Analysis chain
Overall implementation aligns with PR objectives, but verify .env configuration.
The reservation.controller.js file successfully implements the backend route for handling café reservations as described in the PR objectives. It provides a createReservation function that can be used as a route handler for the POST /create-reservation endpoint.
However, there are two points to address:
-
As mentioned in previous comments, consider enhancing the implementation with input validation, more specific error handling, and secure response formatting.
-
The PR objectives mention the implementation of a .env file for secure management of environment variables. This is not visible in the current file.
Please ensure that the .env configuration has been implemented correctly. You can verify this by running the following command:
This script will check for the presence of a .env file, display its structure (without revealing sensitive values), and search for any usage of environment variables in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for the presence of a .env file and its contents
if [ -f .env ]; then
echo ".env file exists"
# Print the .env file contents without showing actual values
sed 's/=.*/=****/' .env
else
echo ".env file not found"
fi
# Check if any environment variables are used in the codebase
rg -i '(process\.env\.|dotenv)'
Length of output: 242
backend/models/reservation.model.js
Outdated
| const reservationSchema = new Schema({ | ||
| Guests: { | ||
| type: String, | ||
| required: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| Date: { | ||
| type: String, | ||
| required: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| Time: { | ||
| type: String, | ||
| required: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance schema definition for better data integrity and consistency
While the basic structure is correct, consider the following improvements:
- Use lowercase for field names (e.g.,
guests,date,time) to follow JavaScript conventions. - Change the
Guestsfield to a Number type for easier querying and validation. - Use the Date type for the
Datefield to leverage MongoDB's date operations. - Add more specific validation to ensure data integrity.
Here's a suggested refactor:
const reservationSchema = new Schema({
guests: {
type: Number,
required: true,
min: [1, 'At least one guest is required'],
max: [20, 'Maximum 20 guests allowed']
},
date: {
type: Date,
required: true,
min: [new Date(), 'Date must be in the future']
},
time: {
type: String,
required: true,
match: [/^([0-1]?[0-9]|2[0-3]):[0-5][0-9]$/, 'Time must be in HH:MM format']
}
});This refactor improves type safety, adds validation, and follows naming conventions.
|
|
||
| app.post("/create-reservation", createReservation); | ||
|
|
||
| app.listen(port, () => console.log(`Server is running on port ${port}!`)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Make the server port configurable via environment variables
Currently, the server port is hardcoded to 3000. To allow greater flexibility and ease of deployment across different environments, consider using an environment variable for the port number.
Apply this diff to make the port configurable:
-const port = 3000;
+const port = process.env.PORT || 3000;
app.listen(port, () => console.log(`Server is running on port ${port}!`));Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
backend/index.js
Outdated
| const app = express(); | ||
| const port = 3000; | ||
| require("dotenv").config(); | ||
| const mongoose = require("mongoose"); | ||
| const { createReservation } = require("./controller/reservation.controller"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
createReservation is not exported from ./controller/reservation.controller.js
The createReservation function is not exported in ./controller/reservation.controller.js. Please ensure that it is properly exported to make it available for the route handler.
- File:
./backend/controller/reservation.controller.js
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify that createReservation is correctly exported from reservation.controller
To ensure that the createReservation function is properly exported and available for the route handler, please confirm that it is correctly exported in ./controller/reservation.controller.js.
Run the following script to verify the export:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if 'createReservation' is exported from 'reservation.controller.js'
# Test: Search for 'exports.createReservation' or 'module.exports' containing 'createReservation'
grep -E 'exports\.createReservation|module\.exports.*createReservation' ./controller/reservation.controller.js
# Also check for ES6 exports
grep -E 'export\s+(function|const|let|var)\s+createReservation' ./controller/reservation.controller.js
Length of output: 361
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate 'reservation.controller.js' within the codebase
fd 'reservation.controller.js' .
Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if 'createReservation' is exported from the correct 'reservation.controller.js' file
# Check for CommonJS exports
grep -E 'exports\.createReservation|module\.exports.*createReservation' ./backend/controller/reservation.controller.js
# Check for ES6 exports
grep -E 'export\s+(function|const|let|var)\s+createReservation' ./backend/controller/reservation.controller.js
Length of output: 233
| const handleSubmit = (e) => { | ||
| e.preventDefault(); | ||
| fetch("http://localhost:3000/create-reservation", { | ||
| method: "POST", | ||
| headers: { | ||
| "Content-Type": "application/json", | ||
| }, | ||
| body: JSON.stringify({ | ||
| Guests, | ||
| Date, | ||
| Time, | ||
| }), | ||
| }) | ||
| .then((res) => res.json()) | ||
| .then((data) => console.log(data)) | ||
| .catch((error) => console.log(error)); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use environment variables for API endpoint and provide user feedback
The API endpoint URL "http://localhost:3000/create-reservation" is hardcoded in the fetch call. To enhance flexibility and security, especially in different environments (development, staging, production), consider using environment variables to store the base URL of your API.
Also, currently, the response from the server is logged to the console, and there's no feedback to the user upon successful submission or error. Providing user feedback improves user experience.
Apply this diff to use an environment variable for the API endpoint:
- fetch("http://localhost:3000/create-reservation", {
+ fetch(`${process.env.REACT_APP_API_BASE_URL}/create-reservation`, {Ensure you have REACT_APP_API_BASE_URL defined in your .env file.
Additionally, handle user feedback by updating the UI based on the response:
- .then((data) => console.log(data))
+ .then((data) => {
+ // Handle success (e.g., show a success message or redirect)
+ console.log("Reservation successful:", data);
+ })And handle errors appropriately:
- .catch((error) => console.log(error));
+ .catch((error) => {
+ // Handle error (e.g., show an error message to the user)
+ console.error("Reservation failed:", error);
+ });Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@samar12-rad
add the URL in .env file
http://localhost:3000
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
|
hi @samar12-rad i faced some issues yesterday while deployment thats why it came and please do
then i will merge it |
RamakrushnaBiswal
added
enhancement
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- backend/controller/reservation.controller.js (1 hunks)
- backend/package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
backend/package.json (3)
20-21: Correct placement of nodemon in devDependenciesGreat job moving
nodemonto thedevDependenciessection. This follows best practices for development tools that are not required in production.
Line range hint
1-23: Overall package.json changes align well with PR objectivesThe changes to
package.jsoneffectively support the PR objectives of enhancing backend functionality for the café reservation system and implementing environment variable management. The addition ofcors,dotenv,mongoose, andzodprovides the necessary tools for handling API requests, managing environment variables, interacting with the database, and validating data.A few minor adjustments have been suggested to optimize the configuration:
- Updating the Express version
- Separating development and production start scripts
Once these are addressed, the backend configuration will be well-prepared to support the new reservation system features.
14-18:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate express version and verify new dependencies
- The express version issue from the previous review is still present. Please update it:
- "express": "^4.21.0", + "express": "^4.18.2",
- The new dependencies (cors, dotenv, mongoose, zod) align well with the PR objectives for enhancing backend functionality and managing environment variables. Ensure that these are being used effectively in your implementation.
backend/controller/reservation.controller.js (1)
33-35: Exports look good.The
createReservationfunction is correctly exported, making it available for use in other parts of the application.
| @@ -3,13 +3,21 @@ | |||
| "version": "1.0.0", | |||
| "main": "index.js", | |||
| "scripts": { | |||
| "start": "nodemon index.js", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding separate scripts for development and production
While using nodemon for auto-reloading during development is great, it's not typically used in production. Consider adding separate scripts for development and production:
"scripts": {
- "start": "nodemon index.js",
+ "start": "node index.js",
+ "dev": "nodemon index.js",
"test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1"
},This way, npm start can be used for production, and npm run dev for development with auto-reloading.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "start": "nodemon index.js", | |
| "start": "node index.js", | |
| "dev": "nodemon index.js", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@samar12-rad
add this
"start": "node index.js",
"dev": "nodemon index.js",
other wise give error while deploying
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
| const { z } = require("zod"); | ||
| const Reservation = require("../models/reservation.model"); | ||
|
|
||
| // Define the Zod schema for reservation validation | ||
| const reservationSchema = z.object({ | ||
| Guests: z.string(), | ||
| Date: z.string(), | ||
| Time: z.string(), | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| async function createReservation(req, res) { | ||
| try { | ||
| // Validate the request body against the schema | ||
| const validationResult = reservationSchema.safeParse(req.body); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!validationResult.success) { | ||
| return res.status(400).json({ message: validationResult.error.errors }); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Create the reservation if validation passes | ||
| const reservation = await Reservation.create({ | ||
| Guests: validationResult.data.Guests, | ||
| Date: validationResult.data.Date, | ||
| Time: validationResult.data.Time, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| res.status(201).json(reservation); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| res.status(400).json({ message: error.message }); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| module.exports = { | ||
| createReservation, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
.env file is missing from the project root.
The application is configured to use environment variables via the dotenv package, as evidenced by the usage of require("dotenv").config(); and process.env.MONGO_URI. However, the .env file is not present in the repository. To ensure proper configuration and functionality:
- Create a
.envfile in the project root. - Define necessary environment variables (e.g.,
MONGO_URI) within the.envfile. - Add
.envto.gitignoreto prevent accidental commits of sensitive information.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify .env file implementation and usage.
The PR objectives mention implementing a .env file for secure management of environment variables. However, this file doesn't directly use any environment variables. To ensure proper setup:
- Confirm that a .env file has been created in the project root.
- Verify that sensitive information (like database connection strings) is stored in the .env file.
- Ensure that the .env file is added to .gitignore to prevent accidental commits.
Run the following script to check for .env file and its usage:
If the .env file is not found or environment variables are not used, consider updating the PR description or implementing the .env configuration as described in the PR objectives.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for .env file and its usage
if [ -f .env ]; then
echo ".env file exists"
# Print the .env file structure without revealing values
sed 's/=.*/=****/' .env
else
echo ".env file not found"
fi
# Check for environment variable usage in the codebase
rg -i '(process\.env\.|dotenv)'
Length of output: 242
|
also your branch is not upto date with main branch thats why it shows deployment error |
|
| GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | MongoDB Credentials | 4af9a60 | backend/.env | View secret |
| - | - | MongoDB Credentials | 5bf789d | backend/.env | View secret |
| - | - | MongoDB Credentials | 888aa5c | backend/.env | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secrets safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate these secrets.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
backend/routes/index.js (3)
1-4: Imports and router setup look good, but there's an unused import.The Express import and router creation are correct. However, the Reservation model is imported but not used directly in this file.
Consider removing the unused import:
-const Reservation = require("../models/reservation.model");If the Reservation model is needed in the future or used in the sub-router, you can keep it, but it's generally good practice to remove unused imports.
7-16: Root endpoint provides good API information, but could be optimized.The root endpoint returns useful information about the API, which is a good practice. However, since the response is static, you could optimize it by defining it as a constant.
Consider refactoring the endpoint as follows:
const API_INFO = { message: "Welcome to the restaurant API!", version: "1.0.0", endpoints: { Reservation: "/reservation", }, documentation: "https://api-docs-url.com", }; router.get("/", (req, res) => res.json(API_INFO));This approach would slightly improve performance and make the code more maintainable.
1-18: Overall, the router setup is well-implemented, but consider adding error handling.The router implementation is clean, modular, and aligns well with the PR objectives. It provides a good structure for the API, including a sub-router for reservations and informative root endpoint.
To enhance the robustness of the API, consider implementing global error handling middleware. This could be added after all route definitions:
// Add this after your route definitions router.use((err, req, res, next) => { console.error(err.stack); res.status(500).json({ error: 'Something went wrong!' }); });This will catch any errors thrown in your routes and provide a consistent error response to clients.
backend/routes/reservationRouter.js (4)
1-3: LGTM! Consider using path aliases for imports.The imports and router initialization look good. The use of destructuring for importing
createReservationis a good practice.Consider using path aliases (e.g.,
@controllers/reservation.controller) instead of relative paths for better maintainability, especially as the project grows.
5-5: LGTM! Consider using a more RESTful route.The POST route for creating reservations is correctly implemented using the imported controller function.
Consider using a more RESTful route path, such as just "/" instead of "/create". In RESTful conventions, the HTTP method (POST) already implies the creation action.
6-15: Good API information route. Consider a few enhancements.The GET route providing API information is a great addition for documentation purposes.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add more endpoints to the
endpointsobject as they are implemented.- Replace the placeholder documentation URL with the actual URL when available.
- Consider moving this API information to a separate controller function for better organization.
- You might want to include rate limiting information or authentication requirements in the future.
1-17: Overall good implementation. Consider adding error handling and input validation.The reservation router is well-structured and follows Express.js best practices. However, there are a few areas for improvement:
Error Handling: Consider implementing error handling middleware to catch and process any errors that might occur in the route handlers or controller functions.
Input Validation: Add input validation for the POST route, either in the router or the controller function, to ensure that the incoming data meets the required format and constraints.
Authentication and Authorization: Depending on the requirements, you might want to add middleware for authentication and authorization to protect the routes.
Logging: Consider adding logging to track API usage and help with debugging.
Here's an example of how you could implement error handling middleware:
// At the end of your router file router.use((err, req, res, next) => { console.error(err.stack); res.status(500).json({ error: 'Something went wrong!' }); });For input validation, consider using a library like
express-validatororjoi.frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (2)
9-11: Consider initializing 'guests' state with a default valueThe 'guests' state is initialized without a default value, which could lead to issues if not handled properly in the component or when submitting the form. Consider initializing it with a sensible default, such as an empty string or 0.
- const [guests, setGuests] = useState(); + const [guests, setGuests] = useState("");This ensures that 'guests' always has a defined value, making it easier to handle in the component and during form submission.
99-101: Add date validation to prevent past date selectionWhile the onChange handler for the date input is correctly implemented, there's no validation to prevent users from selecting past dates. Consider adding a
minattribute to the input to restrict date selection to today and future dates.<input type="date" id="date" onChange={(e) => { setDate(e.target.value); }} + min={new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0]} className="flex h-10 w-full items-center rounded-md border border-input bg-background px-3 py-2 text-sm ring-offset-background placeholder:text-muted-foreground focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-ring focus:ring-offset-2 disabled:cursor-not-allowed disabled:opacity-50" />This change ensures that users can only select current or future dates for their reservations.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- backend/.env (1 hunks)
- backend/.env.exapmle (1 hunks)
- backend/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- backend/controller/reservation.controller.js (1 hunks)
- backend/index.js (1 hunks)
- backend/models/reservation.model.js (1 hunks)
- backend/routes/index.js (1 hunks)
- backend/routes/reservationRouter.js (1 hunks)
- frontend/package.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (6 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- backend/.env
- backend/.env.exapmle
- backend/.gitignore
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- backend/index.js
- backend/models/reservation.model.js
🔇 Additional comments (7)
backend/routes/index.js (2)
6-6: Good use of sub-router for reservations.The use of a separate router for reservation-related routes is a good practice for maintaining a clean and modular code structure.
18-18: Correct module export.The router is properly exported, allowing it to be used in other parts of the application.
backend/routes/reservationRouter.js (1)
17-17: LGTM! Router export is correct.The router is correctly exported, allowing it to be imported and used in the main Express app file.
frontend/package.json (1)
16-16: LGTM! Axios addition aligns with PR objectives.The addition of axios as a dependency is appropriate for implementing frontend-backend communication, which aligns with the PR objective of adding a backend route for the café reservation form.
To ensure this change is utilized correctly, let's verify the axios usage in the frontend code:
backend/controller/reservation.controller.js (1)
40-42: Module exports look good.The export of the
createReservationfunction is correct and follows common Node.js practices.frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (2)
75-77: LGTM: Guests select input handlerThe onChange handler for the guests select input is correctly implemented. It updates the 'guests' state with the selected value, which is the expected behavior.
115-117: LGTM: Time select input handlerThe onChange handler for the time select input is correctly implemented. It updates the 'time' state with the selected value, which is the expected behavior. The provided time options seem appropriate for a café setting.
| @@ -3,13 +3,21 @@ | |||
| "version": "1.0.0", | |||
| "main": "index.js", | |||
| "scripts": { | |||
| "start": "nodemon index.js", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@samar12-rad
add this
"start": "node index.js",
"dev": "nodemon index.js",
other wise give error while deploying
| const handleSubmit = (e) => { | ||
| e.preventDefault(); | ||
| fetch("http://localhost:3000/create-reservation", { | ||
| method: "POST", | ||
| headers: { | ||
| "Content-Type": "application/json", | ||
| }, | ||
| body: JSON.stringify({ | ||
| Guests, | ||
| Date, | ||
| Time, | ||
| }), | ||
| }) | ||
| .then((res) => res.json()) | ||
| .then((data) => console.log(data)) | ||
| .catch((error) => console.log(error)); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@samar12-rad
add the URL in .env file
http://localhost:3000
RamakrushnaBiswal
merged commit cb8ff6a
into
RamakrushnaBiswal:main
This PR introduces backend functionality for the "Make Reservation" form in the café system, as well as a .env file for managing environment variables securely. For the issue #30
Changes Made:
Created Reservation Route:
Added a POST route (/create-reservation) to handle incoming reservation form data.
Data Validation:
Implemented validation for key fields.
Database Integration:
Connected the reservation form to the database (e.g., MongoDB or SQL) to store reservation data.
Response Handling:
The route provides appropriate success/failure responses for reservation requests.
Added .env File:
Implemented .env configuration to store sensitive environment variables, such as database connection strings and API keys.
Impact:
Users can now submit reservations through the form, and their details are stored in the database.
Environment variables are securely managed through the .env file for better security and flexibility in different environments.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
/create.Registercomponent for users to input reservation details (Guests, Date, Time).Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores