Add feat/ContactUs-form branch #381
Conversation
|
@PriyanshuValiya is attempting to deploy a commit to the bunty's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@PriyanshuValiya has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes introduced in this pull request include the implementation of a contact form handling feature using the Zod library for validation and Nodemailer for email transmission. A new Express router for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for submitting your pull request! 🙌 We'll review it as soon as possible. In the meantime, please ensure that your changes align with our CONTRIBUTING.md. If there are any specific instructions or feedback regarding your PR, we'll provide them here. Thanks again for your contribution! 😊 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
backend/routes/contactUsRouter.js (2)
5-5: LGTM: Route definition is correct. Consider adding a comment.The route definition is concise and follows Express.js conventions. To improve code readability and maintainability, consider adding a brief comment describing the purpose of this route.
Example:
// Handle POST requests for contact form submissions router.post("/contactus", createContactUs);
1-7: Overall: Well-structured router file. Consider additional enhancements.The
contactUsRouter.jsfile is concise, focused, and follows Express.js best practices. It correctly sets up a route for handling contact form submissions. To further improve the file:
- Consider adding input validation middleware if not already handled in the controller.
- Implement error handling middleware for this specific route if needed.
- If there are any authentication or authorization requirements for this route, ensure they are applied.
backend/routes/index.js (3)
8-17: LGTM: Excellent error handling for module imports.The
safeRequireutility function is a great addition. It provides consistent error handling for module imports and uses the Winston logger effectively. The fallback function ensures graceful error responses.Consider adding more context to the error log by including the
fallbackMessage:- logger.error(`Error loading ${modulePath}:`, error); + logger.error(`Error loading ${modulePath} (${fallbackMessage}):`, error);This will make it easier to identify which functionality is affected when reviewing logs.
20-22: LGTM: Consistent use ofsafeRequirefor router imports.The updates to router imports using
safeRequireimprove error handling and consistency across the application. The addition of the contact router is noted.Consider grouping all router imports together for better readability. For example:
const routers = { feedback: safeRequire("./feedbackRouter", "Feedback functionality is currently unavailable"), contactUs: safeRequire("./contactUsRouter", "Contact Us functionality is currently unavailable"), event: safeRequire("./eventRouter", "Event functionality is currently unavailable"), admin: safeRequire("./adminRouter", "Admin functionality is currently unavailable"), user: safeRequire("./customerRouter", "User functionality is currently unavailable"), reservation: safeRequire("./reservationRouter", "Reservation functionality is currently unavailable"), newsletter: safeRequire("./newsletterRoute", "Newsletter functionality is currently unavailable"), forgot: safeRequire("./forgotRouter", "Forgot password functionality is currently unavailable") };Then use them like
router.use("/admin", routers.admin);. This would make the code more maintainable and easier to read.Also applies to: 37-37, 39-42
30-30: Consider updating the endpoints list for completeness.While adding the Feedback endpoint to the root route response is good for API discoverability, the list is not comprehensive. It's missing several endpoints that are defined in the router.
Consider updating the endpoints object to include all available endpoints:
endpoints: { Reservation: "/reservation", Feedback: "/feedback", Event: "/event", Admin: "/admin", User: "/user", Newsletter: "/newsletter", ForgotPassword: "/forgot", Contact: "/contact" },This will provide a more accurate representation of your API's capabilities.
frontend/src/router/index.jsx (1)
43-43: LGTM: New route for ContactUs page.The new route for the ContactUs page is correctly implemented and follows the existing pattern in the file.
For consistency with other routes, consider moving this route up to be grouped with other page routes (e.g., after the "/about" route).
frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (1)
22-22: LGTM! Consider adding an aria-label for accessibility.The addition of the "CONTACTUS" menu item is consistent with the existing structure and aligns with the PR objectives.
For improved accessibility, consider adding an
aria-labelto the Link component when rendering this menu item. For example:<Link to={item.path} className={`${baseTextColorClass} ${hoverTextColorClass}`} aria-label={item.name === 'CONTACTUS' ? 'Contact Us page' : item.name} > {item.name} </Link>backend/controller/contact.controller.js (2)
5-5: Fix typos in the comment.There are typos in the comment on line 5. It should read "Data required from .env file: EMAIL_USER, EMAIL_PASS."
Apply this diff to correct the comment:
-// data require form .env file : EMAIL_USER, EMAIL_PASS +// Data required from .env file: EMAIL_USER, EMAIL_PASS
14-14: Remove the unused variableinfo.The variable
infodeclared on line 14 is not used anywhere in the code. Removing it will clean up the code.Apply this diff to remove the unused variable:
-const info = { messageId: "23DCS141" };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- backend/config/oauth.config.js (1 hunks)
- backend/controller/contact.controller.js (1 hunks)
- backend/index.js (1 hunks)
- backend/routes/contactUsRouter.js (1 hunks)
- backend/routes/index.js (1 hunks)
- frontend/package.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/ContactUs.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/router/index.jsx (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- backend/config/oauth.config.js
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (10)
backend/routes/contactUsRouter.js (2)
1-3: LGTM: Imports and router setup are correct.The import statements and router setup follow best practices. The comment confirming the correct controller path is helpful for maintainability.
7-7: LGTM: Router export is correct.The router is properly exported using CommonJS syntax, which is appropriate for Node.js applications.
frontend/package.json (1)
27-27: LGTM! Verify usage of the new dependency.The addition of the "lucide-react" dependency is appropriate and aligns with the changes mentioned in the PR summary. This library likely provides icons or UI components that will be used in the new ContactUs form.
To ensure this dependency is being utilized effectively, please run the following script to check its usage across the project:
This will help confirm that the new dependency is being used appropriately in the project, particularly in the new ContactUs component.
backend/index.js (1)
Line range hint
1-67: Acknowledge good practices in server setupWhile reviewing the changes, I noticed several good practices in the existing code:
- Proper use of environment variables for configuration.
- CORS configuration with specific allowed origins.
- Consistent use of logging throughout the file.
- Inclusion of a health check endpoint.
- Correct placement of error handling middleware at the end of the middleware chain.
These practices contribute to a robust and maintainable server setup. Keep up the good work!
backend/routes/index.js (3)
2-2: LGTM: Good addition of structured logging.The import of the Winston logger is a positive change. It introduces structured logging to the application, which will improve debugging and log management.
1-44: Overall assessment: Good improvements to error handling and routing.The changes to this file enhance the application's robustness through improved error handling and the addition of new functionality. The
safeRequireutility function is a particularly good addition, providing consistent error handling for module imports.Key points:
- Improved error handling for module imports.
- Addition of structured logging with Winston.
- Consistent use of
safeRequirefor all router imports.- Addition of new contact functionality.
The suggestions provided are minor and aimed at improving code organization, readability, and API documentation. Overall, these changes represent a significant improvement to the routing setup of the application.
43-43: LGTM: New contact functionality added.The addition of the contact router is a good enhancement to the application's functionality.
To ensure this new functionality is properly implemented and documented, could you provide more information about the
contactUsRouter? Specifically:
- What endpoints does it expose?
- What kind of data does it handle?
- Is there any documentation or API specs for this new functionality?
You can run the following command to inspect the
contactUsRouter:This will help ensure that the new functionality is properly integrated and follows the project's standards.
✅ Verification successful
Contact Functionality Verified
The
contactUsRouterandcreateContactUsfunction are properly implemented and adhere to the project's standards.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the contactUsRouter implementation cat backend/routes/contactUsRouter.jsLength of output: 280
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the createContactUs function in contact.controller.js cat backend/controller/contact.controller.jsLength of output: 1948
frontend/src/router/index.jsx (2)
24-24: LGTM: Import statement for ContactUs component.The import statement for the ContactUs component is correctly placed and follows the existing pattern in the file.
24-24: Verify the implementation of the ContactUs component.The changes to add the ContactUs page to the routing structure are well-implemented and enhance the application's functionality. To ensure a smooth user experience, please verify that the ContactUs component is fully implemented and tested.
Run the following script to check the implementation of the ContactUs component:
Also applies to: 43-43
✅ Verification successful
---
ContactUs Component Implemented Correctly
The ContactUs component has been successfully located and verified. No TODO comments were found, indicating that the component's implementation is complete.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the ContactUs component # Test: Check if the ContactUs component file exists fd -t f "ContactUs.jsx" src/components/Pages # Test: Check the content of the ContactUs component cat $(fd -t f "ContactUs.jsx" src/components/Pages) # Test: Check for any TODO comments in the ContactUs component rg "TODO" $(fd -t f "ContactUs.jsx" src/components/Pages)Length of output: 476
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the ContactUs.jsx component and verify its implementation # Find the path to ContactUs.jsx CONTACTUS_PATH=$(fd -t f "ContactUs.jsx") # Check if the ContactUs.jsx file was found if [ -z "$CONTACTUS_PATH" ]; then echo "ContactUs.jsx not found in the repository." exit 1 fi # Display the path of ContactUs.jsx echo "ContactUs.jsx found at: $CONTACTUS_PATH" # Display the content of ContactUs.jsx cat "$CONTACTUS_PATH" # Check for any TODO comments in ContactUs.jsx rg "TODO" "$CONTACTUS_PATH"Length of output: 6326
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the ContactUs.jsx component anywhere in the repository and verify its implementation # Find the path to ContactUs.jsx CONTACTUS_PATH=$(fd -t f "ContactUs.jsx") # Check if the ContactUs.jsx file was found if [ -z "$CONTACTUS_PATH" ]; then echo "ContactUs.jsx not found in the repository." exit 1 fi # Display the path(s) of ContactUs.jsx echo "ContactUs.jsx found at:" echo "$CONTACTUS_PATH" # Iterate through each found ContactUs.jsx file while IFS= read -r file; do echo "----- Content of $file -----" cat "$file" echo "----- Checking for TODO comments in $file -----" rg "TODO" "$file" done <<< "$CONTACTUS_PATH"Length of output: 6701
frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (1)
Line range hint
1-238: Verify the setup of the ContactUs page and route.The addition of the "CONTACTUS" menu item looks good. To ensure full functionality:
- Confirm that a corresponding route for "/contactus" has been added in the router configuration.
- Verify that a ContactUs component or page has been created and is correctly linked to this route.
Run the following script to check for the ContactUs route and component:
✅ Verification successful
Please verify the setup of the ContactUs route and component by running the following scripts:
Please verify that the
/contactusroute is correctly defined and renders theContactUscomponent by running the following scripts:
Please verify that the
/contactusroute correctly renders theContactUscomponent by running the following scripts:
Please verify that the
/contactusroute correctly renders theContactUscomponent by running the following scripts:
ContactUs route and component are correctly set up.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the setup of ContactUs route and component # Check for ContactUs route in the router configuration echo "Checking for ContactUs route:" rg -n "path: '/contactus'" src/ # Check for ContactUs component echo "Checking for ContactUs component:" fd -e jsx -e js ContactUs src/Length of output: 355
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the setup of ContactUs route and component across the entire repository # Check for ContactUs route in the router configuration echo "Checking for ContactUs route:" rg -n "path: '/contactus'" . # Check for ContactUs component echo "Checking for ContactUs component:" fd -e jsx -e js ContactUs .Length of output: 350
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the /contactus route is defined and renders the ContactUs component # Search for Route definitions with path '/contactus' echo "Searching for Route definitions with path '/contactus':" rg -n "path\s*=\s*['\"]/contactus['\"]" . # Verify that these Route definitions render the ContactUs component echo "Verifying that the '/contactus' route renders the ContactUs component:" rg -n "element\s*=\s*{<ContactUs \/>}" .Length of output: 595
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the /contactus route is defined and renders the ContactUs component # Search for Route definitions with path '/contactus' echo "Searching for Route definitions with path '/contactus':" rg -n "path\s*=\s*['\"]/contactus['\"]" . # Verify that these Route definitions render the ContactUs component echo "Verifying that the '/contactus' route renders the ContactUs component:" rg -n "element\s*=\s*{<ContactUs\s*/>}" .Length of output: 597
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the /contactus route is defined and renders the ContactUs component # Search for Route definitions with path '/contactus' echo "Searching for Route definitions with path '/contactus':" rg -n "path\s*=\s*['\"]/contactus['\"]" . # Verify that these Route definitions render the ContactUs component echo "Verifying that the '/contactus' route renders the ContactUs component:" rg -n "element\s*=\s*{\s*<ContactUs\s*/>\s*}" .Length of output: 609
backend/index.js
Outdated
| @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ require("dotenv").config(); | |||
| const cors = require("cors"); | |||
| const mongoose = require("mongoose"); | |||
| const logger = require("./config/logger"); | |||
| const errorMiddleware = require("./middlewares/errorMiddleware"); // Corrected typo | |||
| const errorMiddleware = require("../backend/middlewares/errrorMiddleware"); // Corrected typo | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Fix typo in error middleware filename and import path
The error middleware file is incorrectly named with an extra 'r', which can lead to confusion and potential issues.
-
Rename
backend/middlewares/errrorMiddleware.jstobackend/middlewares/errorMiddleware.js. -
Update the import statement in
backend/index.jsaccordingly:- const errorMiddleware = require("../backend/middlewares/errrorMiddleware"); // Corrected typo + const errorMiddleware = require("../backend/middlewares/errorMiddleware"); // Corrected typo
🔗 Analysis chain
Fix typo in error middleware import path
The import statement for the error middleware contains a typo in the file name. While attempting to correct a previous issue, a new typo has been introduced.
Please apply the following change:
- const errorMiddleware = require("../backend/middlewares/errrorMiddleware"); // Corrected typo
+ const errorMiddleware = require("../backend/middlewares/errorMiddleware"); // Corrected typoAlso, please verify that this is indeed the correct path to the error middleware file. The change from ./ to ../backend/ suggests a significant change in the project structure. Ensure that this path is correct relative to the location of index.js.
To verify the correct path of the error middleware file, run the following command:
This will help confirm the correct location of the file and ensure that the import statement is accurate.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the error middleware file and verify its path
# Test: Search for the error middleware file
fd errorMiddleware.js
Length of output: 23
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the incorrectly named error middleware file to verify the typo
# Test: Search for the incorrectly spelled error middleware file
fd errrorMiddleware.js
Length of output: 64
| const validation = contactSchema.safeParse(req.body); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!validation.success) { | ||
| console.log("Error at validation"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use console.error for logging errors.
Using console.error instead of console.log for logging errors provides better semantic meaning and can help in error monitoring.
Apply this diff to update the logging statements:
// In validation failure
- console.log("Error at validation");
+ console.error("Error at validation");
// In sendMail error handling
- return console.log("Error occurred: " + error.message);
+ console.error("Error occurred: " + error.message);
// In catch block
- console.log(`Error at transport: ${err}`);
+ console.error(`Error at transport: ${err}`);Also applies to: 54-54, 64-64
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const mailOptions = { | ||
| from: mail, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid setting 'from' to a user-provided email to prevent spoofing.
Setting the from field to a user-provided email address (mail) can lead to email spoofing and may cause the email to be rejected or marked as spam. Use a verified email address for the from field and set replyTo to the user's email address.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
const mailOptions = {
- from: mail,
+ from: process.env.EMAIL_USER,
+ replyTo: mail,
to: process.env.EMAIL_USER,
subject: subject,
text: message,
};This ensures that the email is sent from a trusted address while allowing you to reply to the user's email.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| from: mail, | |
| from: process.env.EMAIL_USER, | |
| replyTo: mail, | |
| to: process.env.EMAIL_USER, |
| tls: { | ||
| rejectUnauthorized: false, // Disable strict SSL verification | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enable SSL verification in transporter configuration.
Disabling SSL verification by setting rejectUnauthorized: false can expose the application to security risks like man-in-the-middle attacks. It's best to enable SSL verification unless there's a specific reason not to.
Apply this diff to enable SSL verification:
tls: {
- rejectUnauthorized: false, // Disable strict SSL verification
+ // Removed to enable strict SSL verification
},If the tls configuration is not required, you can remove it entirely.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| tls: { | |
| rejectUnauthorized: false, // Disable strict SSL verification | |
| }, | |
| tls: { | |
| // Removed to enable strict SSL verification | |
| }, |
| console.log("Error at validation"); | ||
| return res.status(400).json({ | ||
| status: "error", | ||
| errors: "contactSchema is not validate", | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling and messages on validation failure.
The error message "contactSchema is not validate" is grammatically incorrect. Additionally, consider providing detailed validation errors to the client for better clarity.
Apply this diff to fix the error message and include validation details:
console.log("Error at validation");
return res.status(400).json({
status: "error",
- errors: "contactSchema is not validate",
+ errors: validation.error.errors,
});This change returns the specific validation errors provided by Zod, helping the client understand what went wrong.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| console.log("Error at validation"); | |
| return res.status(400).json({ | |
| status: "error", | |
| errors: "contactSchema is not validate", | |
| }); | |
| console.log("Error at validation"); | |
| return res.status(400).json({ | |
| status: "error", | |
| errors: validation.error.errors, | |
| }); |
| transporter.sendMail(mailOptions, (error, mailOptions) => { | ||
| if (error) { | ||
| return console.log("Error occurred: " + error.message); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle errors in transporter.sendMail and send appropriate responses.
Currently, if sendMail fails, the error is only logged, and the client still receives a 200 OK response. To properly inform the client of the failure, send an error response when sending the email fails.
Apply this diff to handle errors and send appropriate responses:
// Send mail with defined transport object
transporter.sendMail(mailOptions, (error, info) => {
if (error) {
- return console.log("Error occurred: " + error.message);
+ console.error("Error occurred: " + error.message);
+ return res.status(500).json({
+ status: "error",
+ message: "There was an error sending your message. Please try again later.",
+ });
}
-
+ res.status(200).json({
+ status: "success",
+ message: "Your contact request has been successfully received.",
+ });
});
-
-res.status(200).json({
- status: "success",
- message: "Your contact request has been successfully received.",
-});This change moves the success response inside the callback after the email is sent successfully and sends an error response if there's a failure.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| transporter.sendMail(mailOptions, (error, mailOptions) => { | |
| if (error) { | |
| return console.log("Error occurred: " + error.message); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| transporter.sendMail(mailOptions, (error, info) => { | |
| if (error) { | |
| console.error("Error occurred: " + error.message); | |
| return res.status(500).json({ | |
| status: "error", | |
| message: "There was an error sending your message. Please try again later.", | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| res.status(200).json({ | |
| status: "success", | |
| message: "Your contact request has been successfully received.", | |
| }); | |
| }); |
| const info = { messageId: "23DCS141" }; | ||
|
|
||
| const createContactUs = async (req, res) => { | ||
| const validation = contactSchema.safeParse(req.body); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Environment variables EMAIL_USER and EMAIL_PASS are not set.
Please set EMAIL_USER and EMAIL_PASS in your deployment environment to prevent authentication issues.
🔗 Analysis chain
Ensure environment variables are loaded correctly.
While you have require("dotenv").config(); at the top, it's important to ensure that the environment variables EMAIL_USER and EMAIL_PASS are properly loaded and handled in case they're missing.
Run the following script to check if the environment variables are set:
Ensure that these variables are set in your deployment environment to prevent authentication errors.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that EMAIL_USER and EMAIL_PASS are defined in the environment.
# Check for EMAIL_USER
if [ -z "$EMAIL_USER" ]; then
echo "Environment variable EMAIL_USER is not set."
else
echo "Environment variable EMAIL_USER is set."
fi
# Check for EMAIL_PASS
if [ -z "$EMAIL_PASS" ]; then
echo "Environment variable EMAIL_PASS is not set."
else
echo "Environment variable EMAIL_PASS is set."
fi
Length of output: 225
| <form onSubmit={handleSubmit} className="space-y-4"> | ||
| <div> | ||
| <input | ||
| type="mail" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the input type for the email field.
The type attribute for the email input should be "email" instead of "mail" to enable proper email validation.
Apply this diff to fix the input type:
- type="mail"
+ type="email"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| type="mail" | |
| type="email" |
|
|
||
| // Basic client-side validation for security | ||
| if (!mail || !subject || !message) { | ||
| setError('All fields are required, including the rating.'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update error message to reflect actual fields.
The error message mentions "including the rating," but there is no rating field in the form. Please update the message to accurately reflect the required fields.
Apply this diff to correct the error message:
- setError('All fields are required, including the rating.');
+ setError('All fields are required.');📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| setError('All fields are required, including the rating.'); | |
| setError('All fields are required.'); |
| const response = await fetch(`${API_URL}/api/contact/contactus`, { | ||
| method: 'POST', | ||
| headers: { | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | ||
| }, | ||
| body: JSON.stringify({ mail, subject, message }), | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add response status check after the fetch request.
Currently, the code assumes that the fetch request is always successful. It's good practice to check the response status and handle errors accordingly.
Apply this diff to check the response status:
const response = await fetch(`${API_URL}/api/contact/contactus`, {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
},
body: JSON.stringify({ mail, subject, message }),
});
+ if (!response.ok) {
+ throw new Error('Network response was not ok');
+ }
setSubmitted(true);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const response = await fetch(`${API_URL}/api/contact/contactus`, { | |
| method: 'POST', | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| }, | |
| body: JSON.stringify({ mail, subject, message }), | |
| }); | |
| const response = await fetch(`${API_URL}/api/contact/contactus`, { | |
| method: 'POST', | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| }, | |
| body: JSON.stringify({ mail, subject, message }), | |
| }); | |
| if (!response.ok) { | |
| throw new Error('Network response was not ok'); | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
backend/controller/contact.controller.js (1)
62-69: Consider more specific error handling.While the current error handling is functional, consider catching specific errors to provide more accurate error messages.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
- } catch (err) { + } catch (err) { + let errorMessage = "There was an error sending your message. Please try again later."; + if (err.code === 'EAUTH') { + errorMessage = "Email authentication failed. Please contact support."; + } else if (err.code === 'ECONNECTION') { + errorMessage = "Connection to email server failed. Please try again later."; + } console.error(`Error at transport: ${err}`); res.status(500).json({ status: "error", - message: - "There was an error sending your message. Please try again later.", + message: errorMessage, });🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 62-62: Expected a semicolon or an implicit semicolon after a statement, but found none
An explicit or implicit semicolon is expected here...
...Which is required to end this statement
(parse)
[error] 62-69: This block statement doesn't serve any purpose and can be safely removed.
Standalone block statements without any block-level declarations are redundant in JavaScript and can be removed to simplify the code.
(lint/complexity/noUselessLoneBlockStatements)
frontend/src/components/Pages/ContactUs.jsx (2)
57-62: Increase success message display duration.The current 3-second timeout for the success message might be too short for users to read. Consider increasing it to 5 seconds.
- }, 3000); + }, 5000);
30-69: Implement security measures.Consider adding the following security enhancements:
- Rate limiting to prevent form spam
- CSRF protection
- Captcha or similar anti-bot measures
Example implementation of rate limiting using a simple cooldown:
const COOLDOWN_PERIOD = 60000; // 1 minute const [lastSubmissionTime, setLastSubmissionTime] = useState(0); const handleSubmit = async (e) => { e.preventDefault(); const now = Date.now(); if (now - lastSubmissionTime < COOLDOWN_PERIOD) { setError('Please wait a moment before submitting again.'); return; } setLastSubmissionTime(now); // ... rest of the submission logic };🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 53-53: Expected a semicolon or an implicit semicolon after a statement, but found none
An explicit or implicit semicolon is expected here...
...Which is required to end this statement
(parse)
[error] 53-54: This code is unreachable
... because this statement will throw an exception beforehand
(lint/correctness/noUnreachable)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- backend/controller/contact.controller.js (1 hunks)
- backend/index.js (1 hunks)
- frontend/package.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/ContactUs.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/router/index.jsx (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- backend/index.js
- frontend/package.json
- frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx
- frontend/src/router/index.jsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
backend/controller/contact.controller.js
[error] 43-44: Expected a property, a shorthand property, a getter, a setter, or a method but instead found '+'.
Expected a property, a shorthand property, a getter, a setter, or a method here.
(parse)
[error] 44-44: Expected a semicolon or an implicit semicolon after a statement, but found none
An explicit or implicit semicolon is expected here...
...Which is required to end this statement
(parse)
[error] 48-48: Expected a catch clause but instead found ';'.
Expected a catch clause here.
(parse)
[error] 62-62: Expected a semicolon or an implicit semicolon after a statement, but found none
An explicit or implicit semicolon is expected here...
...Which is required to end this statement
(parse)
[error] 69-70: Expected a statement but instead found '}'.
Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 62-69: This block statement doesn't serve any purpose and can be safely removed.
Standalone block statements without any block-level declarations are redundant in JavaScript and can be removed to simplify the code.
(lint/complexity/noUselessLoneBlockStatements)
frontend/src/components/Pages/ContactUs.jsx
[error] 53-53: Expected a semicolon or an implicit semicolon after a statement, but found none
An explicit or implicit semicolon is expected here...
...Which is required to end this statement
(parse)
[error] 53-54: This code is unreachable
... because this statement will throw an exception beforehand
(lint/correctness/noUnreachable)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
backend/controller/contact.controller.js (3)
1-10: LGTM! Well-structured schema definition.The Zod schema implementation provides good validation rules for the contact form fields.
15-21: Improve validation error handling.The current implementation doesn't provide detailed validation errors to the client.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
console.error("Error at validation"); return res.status(400).json({ status: "error", - errors: "contactSchema is not validate", + errors: validation.error.errors, });
25-39: Security concerns in transport configuration.
- The commented TLS configuration suggests SSL verification might be disabled in some environments.
- Environment variables need proper validation.
Let's verify the environment variables:
#!/bin/bash # Check for required environment variables in .env files fd -t f "^\.env" -x grep -l "EMAIL_USER\|EMAIL_PASS" {} \;
| transporter.sendMail(mailOptions, (error, mailOptions) => { | ||
| if (error) { | ||
| return console.error("Error occurred: " + error.message); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| res.status(200).json({ | ||
| status: "success", | ||
| message: "Your contact request has been successfully received.", | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix race condition in email sending logic.
The success response is sent regardless of whether the email was successfully sent or not, creating a race condition.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
// Send mail with defined transport object
- transporter.sendMail(mailOptions, (error, mailOptions) => {
- if (error) {
- return console.error("Error occurred: " + error.message);
- }
-
- });
-
- res.status(200).json({
- status: "success",
- message: "Your contact request has been successfully received.",
- });
+ await new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
+ transporter.sendMail(mailOptions, (error, info) => {
+ if (error) {
+ console.error("Error occurred: " + error.message);
+ reject(error);
+ }
+ resolve(info);
+ });
+ });
+
+ res.status(200).json({
+ status: "success",
+ message: "Your contact request has been successfully received.",
+ });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| transporter.sendMail(mailOptions, (error, mailOptions) => { | |
| if (error) { | |
| return console.error("Error occurred: " + error.message); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| res.status(200).json({ | |
| status: "success", | |
| message: "Your contact request has been successfully received.", | |
| }); | |
| await new Promise((resolve, reject) => { | |
| transporter.sendMail(mailOptions, (error, info) => { | |
| if (error) { | |
| console.error("Error occurred: " + error.message); | |
| reject(error); | |
| } | |
| resolve(info); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| res.status(200).json({ | |
| status: "success", | |
| message: "Your contact request has been successfully received.", | |
| }); |
| import { motion } from 'framer-motion'; | ||
| import { useInView } from 'react-intersection-observer'; | ||
| import chess from '../../assets/img/chess.gif'; | ||
| import { FaStar } from 'react-icons/fa6'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unused import FaStar.
The FaStar component from react-icons is imported but never used in the code.
-import { FaStar } from 'react-icons/fa6';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import { FaStar } from 'react-icons/fa6'; |
| const [subject, setSubject] = useState(''); | ||
| const [message, setMessage] = useState(''); | ||
| const [submitted, setSubmitted] = useState(false); | ||
| const [hover, setHover] = useState(null); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unused state variable hover.
The hover state and its setter are declared but never used in the component.
-const [hover, setHover] = useState(null);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const [hover, setHover] = useState(null); |
| if (!response.ok) { | ||
| + throw new Error('Network response was not ok'); | ||
| + } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix syntax error in error handling.
The throw statement has incorrect syntax and makes the following code unreachable.
if (!response.ok) {
- throw new Error('Network response was not ok');
- }
+ throw new Error(`Network response was not ok: ${response.status}`);
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (!response.ok) { | |
| + throw new Error('Network response was not ok'); | |
| + } | |
| if (!response.ok) { | |
| throw new Error(`Network response was not ok: ${response.status}`); | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 53-53: Expected a semicolon or an implicit semicolon after a statement, but found none
An explicit or implicit semicolon is expected here...
...Which is required to end this statement
(parse)
[error] 53-54: This code is unreachable
... because this statement will throw an exception beforehand
(lint/correctness/noUnreachable)
| <input | ||
| type="email" | ||
| id="mail" | ||
| value={mail} | ||
| placeholder="Email ID" | ||
| onChange={(e) => setMail(e.target.value)} | ||
| required | ||
| className="mt-1 block w-full border border-gray-300 rounded-md shadow-sm py-2 px-3 focus:outline-none focus:ring-[#004D43] focus:border-[#004D43]" | ||
| /> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve form accessibility.
Add proper labels and ARIA attributes for better accessibility.
<div>
+ <label htmlFor="mail" className="sr-only">Email Address</label>
<input
type="email"
id="mail"
value={mail}
placeholder="Email ID"
+ aria-label="Email Address"
onChange={(e) => setMail(e.target.value)}
required
className="mt-1 block w-full border border-gray-300 rounded-md shadow-sm py-2 px-3 focus:outline-none focus:ring-[#004D43] focus:border-[#004D43]"
/>
</div>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <input | |
| type="email" | |
| id="mail" | |
| value={mail} | |
| placeholder="Email ID" | |
| onChange={(e) => setMail(e.target.value)} | |
| required | |
| className="mt-1 block w-full border border-gray-300 rounded-md shadow-sm py-2 px-3 focus:outline-none focus:ring-[#004D43] focus:border-[#004D43]" | |
| /> | |
| </div> | |
| <div> | |
| <label htmlFor="mail" className="sr-only">Email Address</label> | |
| <input | |
| type="email" | |
| id="mail" | |
| value={mail} | |
| placeholder="Email ID" | |
| aria-label="Email Address" | |
| onChange={(e) => setMail(e.target.value)} | |
| required | |
| className="mt-1 block w-full border border-gray-300 rounded-md shadow-sm py-2 px-3 focus:outline-none focus:ring-[#004D43] focus:border-[#004D43]" | |
| /> | |
| </div> |
| // Basic client-side validation for security | ||
| if (!mail || !subject || !message) { | ||
| setError('All fields are required.'); | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance input validation.
The current validation only checks for empty fields. Consider adding more robust validation:
- Email format validation
- Maximum length checks
- Input sanitization
- if (!mail || !subject || !message) {
- setError('All fields are required.');
- return;
- }
+ const emailRegex = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/;
+ if (!mail || !subject || !message) {
+ setError('All fields are required.');
+ return;
+ }
+ if (!emailRegex.test(mail)) {
+ setError('Please enter a valid email address.');
+ return;
+ }
+ if (subject.length > 100) {
+ setError('Subject must be less than 100 characters.');
+ return;
+ }
+ if (message.length > 1000) {
+ setError('Message must be less than 1000 characters.');
+ return;
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Basic client-side validation for security | |
| if (!mail || !subject || !message) { | |
| setError('All fields are required.'); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| // Basic client-side validation for security | |
| const emailRegex = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/; | |
| if (!mail || !subject || !message) { | |
| setError('All fields are required.'); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (!emailRegex.test(mail)) { | |
| setError('Please enter a valid email address.'); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (subject.length > 100) { | |
| setError('Subject must be less than 100 characters.'); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (message.length > 1000) { | |
| setError('Message must be less than 1000 characters.'); | |
| return; | |
| } |
Page Preview..
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores