Email is sent on successful reservation #121
Conversation
|
@17arindam is attempting to deploy a commit to the bunty's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new email confirmation feature for reservations in the backend using Nodemailer. A new file, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for submitting your pull request! 🙌 We'll review it as soon as possible. In the meantime, please ensure that your changes align with our CONTRIBUTING.md. If there are any specific instructions or feedback regarding your PR, we'll provide them here. Thanks again for your contribution! 😊 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
frontend/src/components/Shared/AuthContext.jsx (2)
5-13: LGTM: AuthProvider component is well-implemented.The AuthProvider component is correctly implemented as a functional component. It uses the useState hook to manage the email state and properly wraps its children with the AuthContext.Provider, passing down the email state and setter function.
Consider adding PropTypes for the
childrenprop to improve type checking:import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; // ... (rest of the code) AuthProvider.propTypes = { children: PropTypes.node.isRequired };
1-15: Overall: Well-implemented authentication context. Consider adding error handling.The AuthContext implementation is clean, follows React best practices, and provides both a provider component and a custom hook for easy usage. This approach will effectively manage the user's email state across the application.
Consider the following enhancements to make the authentication context more robust:
- Add error handling for cases where the context is used outside of a provider.
- Implement input validation for the email state to ensure it's a valid email format.
- Consider adding a loading state to handle asynchronous authentication operations.
Example implementation for point 1:
export const useAuth = () => { const context = useContext(AuthContext); if (context === undefined) { throw new Error('useAuth must be used within an AuthProvider'); } return context; };backend/package.json (1)
19-19: LGTM! Consider pinning the exact version for better reproducibility.The addition of the
nodemailerpackage aligns well with the PR objective of implementing email functionality for reservation confirmations. This is a good choice for handling email sending in Node.js applications.For improved reproducibility and to prevent potential issues from minor updates, consider pinning the exact version:
- "nodemailer": "^6.9.15", + "nodemailer": "6.9.15",This ensures consistent behavior across different environments and deployments.
frontend/src/App.jsx (1)
Line range hint
12-23: LGTM: AuthProvider correctly wraps the application.The AuthProvider is appropriately placed to wrap the entire application, ensuring that the authentication context is available to all child components. This supports the PR objectives by providing a centralized way to manage user authentication state, which is crucial for the email confirmation feature.
Consider adjusting the indentation of the closing
</AuthProvider>tag to match the opening tag for better readability:<AuthProvider> <KindeProvider clientId={import.meta.env.VITE_KINDE_CLIENT_ID} domain={import.meta.env.VITE_KINDE_DOMAIN} redirectUri={import.meta.env.VITE_KINDE_REDIRECT_URI} logoutUri={import.meta.env.VITE_KINDE_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URI} > <Navbar /> <Outlet /> <Footer /> </KindeProvider> - </AuthProvider> +</AuthProvider>backend/config/nodemailer.js (2)
1-11: Consider using a dedicated email service provider for production.While the current setup using Gmail is functional, it may not be ideal for production environments due to potential limitations (e.g., daily sending limits) and security concerns. Consider using a dedicated email service provider like SendGrid, Mailgun, or Amazon SES for better scalability and reliability in production.
1-45: Overall assessment: Functional implementation with room for improvement.The
nodemailer.jsfile successfully implements the basic functionality for sending reservation confirmation emails, aligning with the PR objectives. The code is well-structured and includes error handling.However, there are several areas where the implementation could be improved for production readiness:
- Consider using a dedicated email service provider instead of Gmail.
- Implement internationalization for email content.
- Use a proper logging mechanism instead of console logs.
- Enhance error handling with more specific error types and messages.
These improvements would enhance the reliability, maintainability, and scalability of the email sending functionality.
frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (3)
13-13: LGTM: Email state added from useAuth.The addition of
useAuthis consistent with the PR objective and allows the component to access the user's email for the reservation process.Consider adding a fallback or default value for email to handle cases where the user might not be authenticated:
const { email = '' } = useAuth();This ensures that the email variable is always defined, preventing potential undefined errors.
27-27: Email added to request body, but consider adding validation and error handling.The inclusion of
- Validate the email before sending the request to ensure it's not empty or invalid.
- Add error handling for the fetch request to manage network errors or server responses.
- Provide user feedback on the status of their reservation (success/failure).
Consider refactoring the
handleSubmitfunction as follows:const handleSubmit = async (e) => { e.preventDefault(); if (!email || !guests || !date || !time) { alert("Please fill in all fields"); return; } try { const response = await fetch(`${import.meta.env.VITE_BACKEND_URL}/api/reservation/create`, { method: "POST", headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json", }, body: JSON.stringify({ email, guests, date, time, }), }); if (!response.ok) { throw new Error('Reservation failed'); } const data = await response.json(); console.log(data); alert("Reservation successful! Check your email for confirmation."); } catch (error) { console.error(error); alert("Failed to make reservation. Please try again."); } };This refactored version includes input validation, proper error handling, and user feedback.
Also applies to: 33-33
Line range hint
1-238: Overall implementation looks good, with room for minor improvements.The changes successfully integrate user authentication and email into the reservation process, aligning well with the PR objectives. The code structure remains clean and consistent with React best practices.
To further enhance the component:
- Consider adding form validation to ensure all required fields are filled before submission.
- Implement loading states during the reservation process to improve user experience.
- Add error boundaries to handle potential rendering errors.
To improve the overall architecture:
- Consider moving the API call logic to a separate service file to keep the component focused on rendering and user interaction.
- Implement a custom hook for form handling to reduce the complexity of the Register component.
- Use a form library like Formik or react-hook-form for more robust form handling and validation.
frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (1)
53-63: Avoid usingconsole.login production codeThe
console.log("User email:", user.email);statement may expose sensitive user information in the browser console. It's recommended to remove it or replace it with a proper logging mechanism that respects user privacy.Apply this diff to remove the
console.logstatement:if (user) { setEmail(user.email); // Store email in the context - console.log("User email:", user.email); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- backend/config/nodemailer.js (1 hunks)
- backend/controller/reservation.controller.js (3 hunks)
- backend/package.json (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/App.jsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (4 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Shared/AuthContext.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (14)
frontend/src/components/Shared/AuthContext.jsx (2)
1-3: LGTM: Imports and context creation are correct.The necessary hooks are imported from React, and the AuthContext is created using
createContext(). This is the correct approach for setting up a context to share authentication state across components.
15-15: LGTM: useAuth custom hook is well-implemented.The useAuth custom hook is correctly implemented using the useContext hook. Exporting this hook provides a convenient and clean way for components to consume the AuthContext without directly using useContext(AuthContext) everywhere.
frontend/src/App.jsx (2)
7-7: LGTM: AuthProvider import added correctly.The import statement for AuthProvider is correctly added and aligns with the PR objectives. This will allow the application to use the authentication context for managing user details, which is crucial for the email confirmation feature.
Line range hint
1-28: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectives.The modifications to
App.jsxeffectively implement the AuthProvider, which is crucial for managing user authentication state. This change supports the PR's objective of sending confirmation emails by ensuring that user details are accessible throughout the application.The AuthProvider wraps the entire application, including the KindeProvider, which is a logical structure. This allows for seamless integration of the custom authentication context with Kinde's authentication system.
These changes lay a solid foundation for the email confirmation feature, enabling access to user details required for personalized emails.
frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (1)
2-2: LGTM: Import of useAuth added correctly.The import of
useAuthfrom the shared AuthContext is consistent with the PR objective of integrating user authentication. This is a good practice for managing authentication state across components.backend/controller/reservation.controller.js (3)
3-4: Imports are correctly set upThe
loggerandsendReservationConfirmationfunctions are properly imported, ensuring that logging and email functionalities are available.
11-11: Email validation added to the schemaGood job incorporating email validation into the reservation schema using Zod. This ensures that incoming reservation requests include a valid email address.
68-68: Export statement is properly definedThe
createReservationfunction is correctly exported, ensuring it can be accessed by other modules.frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx (6)
6-6: ImportinguseAuthfor authentication contextThe
useAuthis correctly imported to access authentication context functions.
9-9: IncludinggetUserfromuseKindeAuthThe addition of
getUserenables retrieval of user details, which is essential for fetching and storing the user's email.
14-14: DestructuringsetEmailfromuseAuthAccessing
setEmailallows the component to manage the user's email within the authentication context effectively.
47-48: Fetching user details upon successful authenticationTriggering
fetchUserDetails()when the user logs in ensures that the user's email is stored in the context for use throughout the application.
95-95: Clearing user email on logoutSetting
setEmail(null);upon logout correctly cleans up the user's email from the context, preventing potential data leakage.
Line range hint
187-204: Ensure consistent styling in mobile menuCheck that the class names and styling applied to the mobile menu items are consistent with the desktop menu for a uniform user experience.
Run the following script to compare class names between mobile and desktop menu items:
✅ Verification successful
✅ Verified: Mobile and Desktop menu styles are consistent
The class names and styling applied to both the mobile and desktop menus are consistent, ensuring a uniform user experience across different devices.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare class names between mobile and desktop menu items. # Test: Extract class names from mobile and desktop menu items. # Expect: Class names should be consistent across both menus. # Find class names in mobile menu echo "Mobile Menu Class Names:" rg --type jsx -A 2 'Mobile Menu' frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx | grep 'className' | sed 's/.*className={`\(.*\)`}/\1/' # Find class names in desktop menu echo "Desktop Menu Class Names:" rg --type jsx -A 5 'Desktop Menu' frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx | grep 'className' | sed 's/.*className={`\(.*\)`}/\1/'Length of output: 438
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare class names between mobile and desktop menu items. # Test: Extract class names from mobile and desktop menu items. # Expect: Class names should be consistent across both menus. # Find class names in mobile menu echo "Mobile Menu Class Names:" rg 'Mobile Menu' frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx -A 2 | grep 'className' | sed 's/.*className={`\(.*\)`}/\1/' # Find class names in desktop menu echo "Desktop Menu Class Names:" rg 'Desktop Menu' frontend/src/components/Shared/Navbar.jsx -A 5 | grep 'className' | sed 's/.*className={`\(.*\)`}/\1/'Length of output: 751
| exports.sendReservationConfirmation = async (email, reservationDetails) => { | ||
| const { reservationDate, guests, time } = reservationDetails; | ||
|
|
||
| // Construct the email content | ||
| const emailText = ` | ||
| Dear Customer, | ||
|
|
||
| We are pleased to confirm your reservation. Here are the details of your reservation: | ||
|
|
||
| Reservation Date: ${reservationDate} | ||
| Number of Guests: ${guests} | ||
| Reservation Time: ${time} | ||
|
|
||
| Thank you for choosing our service. We look forward to hosting you. | ||
|
|
||
| Best regards, | ||
| PlayCafe | ||
| `; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider internationalizing the email content.
The email content is currently hardcoded in English. For a potentially global user base, consider implementing internationalization (i18n) for the email content. This would allow for sending emails in the user's preferred language.
Example implementation:
const i18next = require('i18next');
// ... (i18next setup)
const emailText = i18next.t('reservationConfirmation', {
reservationDate,
guests,
time
});
backend/config/nodemailer.js
Outdated
| try { | ||
| await transporter.sendMail({ | ||
| from: process.env.EMAIL_USER, | ||
| to: email, | ||
| subject: "Reservation Confirmation", | ||
| text: emailText, | ||
| }); | ||
| console.log("Reservation confirmation sent successfully via email"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement a proper logging mechanism for production.
While console.log is useful for development, it's not suitable for production environments. Consider implementing a proper logging mechanism (e.g., Winston or Bunyan) that can handle different log levels and potentially integrate with monitoring services.
Example implementation:
const logger = require('./logger'); // Assume this is your logging setup
// ... in the try block
logger.info('Reservation confirmation sent successfully via email', { email });
backend/config/nodemailer.js
Outdated
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error("Error sending reservation confirmation email:", error); | ||
| throw new Error("Failed to send reservation confirmation email"); | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and logging.
The current error handling can be enhanced in several ways:
- Use a proper logging mechanism instead of console.error.
- Include more details in the thrown error message.
- Consider adding specific error types for different failure scenarios.
Here's an example of improved error handling:
const logger = require('./logger'); // Assume this is your logging setup
try {
// ... (existing code)
} catch (error) {
logger.error('Failed to send reservation confirmation email', { error, email });
if (error.code === 'ECONNREFUSED') {
throw new Error('Failed to connect to email server. Please try again later.');
} else {
throw new Error(`Failed to send reservation confirmation email: ${error.message}`);
}
}| try { | ||
| const { email, date, guests, time } = validationResult.data; | ||
| await sendReservationConfirmation(email, { reservationDate: date, guests, time }); | ||
| logger.info(`Reservation confirmation email sent to ${email}`); | ||
| } catch (emailError) { | ||
| logger.error("Error sending reservation confirmation email:", { | ||
| message: emailError.message, | ||
| stack: emailError.stack, | ||
| }); | ||
| // Email error should not block the main reservation process, so no need to return a failure response | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure sensitive information is not exposed in logs
While logging errors is important for debugging, including the full stack trace may inadvertently expose sensitive information. Consider sanitizing the error logs or limiting the details to avoid potential security issues.
You might adjust the logging as follows:
logger.error("Error sending reservation confirmation email:", {
message: emailError.message,
- stack: emailError.stack,
});Or use a logging level that masks sensitive details in production environments.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| try { | |
| const { email, date, guests, time } = validationResult.data; | |
| await sendReservationConfirmation(email, { reservationDate: date, guests, time }); | |
| logger.info(`Reservation confirmation email sent to ${email}`); | |
| } catch (emailError) { | |
| logger.error("Error sending reservation confirmation email:", { | |
| message: emailError.message, | |
| stack: emailError.stack, | |
| }); | |
| // Email error should not block the main reservation process, so no need to return a failure response | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const { email, date, guests, time } = validationResult.data; | |
| await sendReservationConfirmation(email, { reservationDate: date, guests, time }); | |
| logger.info(`Reservation confirmation email sent to ${email}`); | |
| } catch (emailError) { | |
| logger.error("Error sending reservation confirmation email:", { | |
| message: emailError.message, | |
| }); | |
| // Email error should not block the main reservation process, so no need to return a failure response | |
| } |
| // Send the success response | ||
| res.status(201).json({ | ||
| success: true, | ||
| message: "Reservation created successfully", | ||
| message: "Reservation created successfully, confirmation email sent", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Success message may be misleading if email fails to send
The success response always states "Reservation created successfully, confirmation email sent" even if the email sending fails. This could confuse users if they do not receive a confirmation email. Consider updating the response to accurately reflect the email sending status.
Option 1: Modify the success message to be neutral:
res.status(201).json({
success: true,
- message: "Reservation created successfully, confirmation email sent",
+ message: "Reservation created successfully",
data: reservation,
});Option 2: Include an emailSent flag in the response:
let emailSent = true;
try {
// ... email sending logic ...
} catch (emailError) {
// ... error handling ...
+ emailSent = false;
}
// Send the success response
res.status(201).json({
success: true,
message: "Reservation created successfully",
data: reservation,
+ emailSent: emailSent,
});This way, the client can handle the response accordingly.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| // Create the reservation in the database | ||
| const reservation = await Reservation.create(validationResult.data); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential security risk: Prevent extra unwanted fields in request data
The current schema may allow extra fields in req.body that are not defined in the schema, which could lead to overposting vulnerabilities. To mitigate this risk, consider using Zod's .strict() method to ensure only the defined fields are accepted.
Apply this diff to enforce strict schema validation:
-const reservationSchema = z.object({
+const reservationSchema = z.object({
guests: z.string(),
date: z.string(),
time: z.string(),
email: z.string().email(),
+}).strict(); // Disallow unknown keysCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| className={`w-full fixed top-0 z-50 transition duration-300 ${ | ||
| isScrolled ? "bg-[#E0F0B1]" : "bg-transparent" | ||
| } ${isScrolled ? "text-gray-800" : "text-black"} ${isScrolled ? "shadow-lg" : ""}`} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify conditional className concatenation
The current className concatenation with multiple ternary operators can be hard to read and maintain. Consider using the classnames library to improve readability and manage class names more effectively.
First, install the classnames library if it's not already included:
npm install classnamesImport classnames at the top of the file:
+ import classNames from 'classnames';Refactor the className prop using classnames:
- className={`w-full fixed top-0 z-50 transition duration-300 ${
- isScrolled ? "bg-[#E0F0B1]" : "bg-transparent"
- } ${isScrolled ? "text-gray-800" : "text-black"} ${isScrolled ? "shadow-lg" : ""}`}
+ className={classNames(
+ 'w-full fixed top-0 z-50 transition duration-300',
+ {
+ 'bg-[#E0F0B1] text-gray-800 shadow-lg': isScrolled,
+ 'bg-transparent text-black': !isScrolled,
+ }
+ )}| {isMenuOpen ? ( | ||
| <svg | ||
| className="h-6 w-6" | ||
| fill="none" | ||
| stroke="black" | ||
| viewBox="0 0 24 24" | ||
| xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" | ||
| > | ||
| <path strokeLinecap="round" strokeLinejoin="round" strokeWidth="2" d="M6 18L18 6M6 6l12 12" /> | ||
| </svg> | ||
| : <svg className="h-6 w-6" fill="none" stroke="black" viewBox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <svg | ||
| className="h-6 w-6" | ||
| fill="none" | ||
| stroke="black" | ||
| viewBox="0 0 24 24" | ||
| xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" | ||
| > | ||
| <path strokeLinecap="round" strokeLinejoin="round" strokeWidth="2" d="M4 6h16M4 12h16M4 18h16" /> | ||
| </svg> | ||
| } | ||
| )} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract SVG icons into separate components
The inline SVG code for menu icons makes the JSX lengthy and may reduce readability. Consider extracting the SVGs into separate components or files for cleaner code and reusability.
Example:
Create separate components for the icons:
// MenuOpenIcon.jsx
const MenuOpenIcon = () => (
<svg
className="h-6 w-6"
fill="none"
stroke="black"
viewBox="0 0 24 24"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
>
<path strokeLinecap="round" strokeLinejoin="round" strokeWidth="2" d="M6 18L18 6M6 6l12 12" />
</svg>
);
export default MenuOpenIcon;// MenuCloseIcon.jsx
const MenuCloseIcon = () => (
<svg
className="h-6 w-6"
fill="none"
stroke="black"
viewBox="0 0 24 24"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
>
<path strokeLinecap="round" strokeLinejoin="round" strokeWidth="2" d="M4 6h16M4 12h16M4 18h16" />
</svg>
);
export default MenuCloseIcon;Then update the Navbar component:
+ import MenuOpenIcon from './MenuOpenIcon';
+ import MenuCloseIcon from './MenuCloseIcon';
...
{isMenuOpen ? (
- <svg>...</svg>
+ <MenuOpenIcon />
) : (
- <svg>...</svg>
+ <MenuCloseIcon />
)}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
backend/controller/reservation.controller.js (1)
33-43: LGTM with suggestion: Email confirmation logic implemented correctly.The email confirmation logic is well-implemented with proper error handling. The error logging has been adjusted to not include the full stack trace, addressing the previous security concern.
However, consider updating the success response to accurately reflect the email sending status. You could include an
emailSentflag in the response:let emailSent = true; try { // ... email sending logic ... } catch (emailError) { // ... error handling ... emailSent = false; } // Send the success response res.status(201).json({ success: true, message: "Reservation created successfully", data: reservation, emailSent: emailSent, });This way, the client can handle the response accordingly and provide accurate feedback to the user.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- backend/config/nodemailer.js (1 hunks)
- backend/controller/reservation.controller.js (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- backend/config/nodemailer.js
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
backend/controller/reservation.controller.js (5)
3-4: LGTM: Necessary imports added for logging and email functionality.The addition of logger and nodemailer imports are appropriate for the new email confirmation feature.
11-12: LGTM: Schema updated with email validation and strict mode.The addition of email validation to the schema is appropriate for the new email confirmation feature. The use of
strict()addresses the previous concern about potential overposting vulnerabilities by disallowing unknown keys.
30-31: LGTM: Reservation created using validated data.Creating the reservation using the validated data from the schema ensures that only clean, validated data is stored in the database.
67-67: LGTM: Correct module export.The
createReservationfunction is correctly exported, making it available for use in other parts of the application.
Line range hint
1-67: Verify email sending functionality.The implementation of the email confirmation feature looks good overall. To ensure everything is working as expected, it would be beneficial to verify the email sending functionality in a test environment.
Consider adding some unit tests for the
createReservationfunction, mocking thesendReservationConfirmationfunction to test both successful and failed email sending scenarios.To help with verification, you can run the following script to check for existing tests:
If no tests are found, consider adding them to ensure the new functionality is properly tested.
|
@RamakrushnaBiswal please review my pr issue no #101 |
|
@17arindam I will review soon |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)
129-132: LGTM! Contributors list updated.The changes to the contributors list look good. It's great to see new contributors being added and existing entries being updated. This helps in recognizing the efforts of all participants in the project.
Consider adding a brief comment in the commit message or PR description explaining the reason for these changes (e.g., "Updated contributors list to reflect recent contributions"). This can help maintain a clear history of project updates.
Also applies to: 138-141, 145-148, 159-162, 188-194, 209-215
135-136: Consider replacing hard tabs with spaces.The static analysis tool Markdownlint has flagged the use of hard tabs in the HTML structure of the contributors table. While this doesn't affect the rendered output, replacing hard tabs with spaces can improve consistency and adhere to Markdown best practices.
Consider using a tool like
prettieror your editor's built-in functionality to automatically convert tabs to spaces throughout the Markdown file. This will ensure consistency and resolve the Markdownlint warnings.Also applies to: 223-224
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
135-135: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
136-136: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- README.md (4 hunks)
- backend/.env.example (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/App.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- backend/.env.example
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- frontend/src/App.jsx
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
README.md
135-135: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
136-136: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
223-223: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
224-224: Column: 1
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
RamakrushnaBiswal
added
enhancement
-now a confirmation email is send on successful reservation
-confirmation email contains all the reservation details
-email is being fetched from kindeAuth
-nodemailer config implemented successfully
-errors are handled using logger
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Enhancements
Documentation