my first encoding #20
Conversation
| <entry xml:id="mosaico" xml:lang="sp"> | ||
| <form type="lemma"><orth norm="mosaico">mosaico</orth></form> | ||
| <gramGrp> | ||
| <pos norm="NOUN">n.</pos> <pos norm="SING">s.</pos> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A noun is a part of speech, but singular is a number, not part of speech. Furthermore, I'm not sure that n.s. means noun singular. I bet it's nomen substantivum, which is really just a noun in Latin. So I would check the introduction of your dictionary just to be sure.
If it was noun singular then I would suggest <gram type="pos" norm="NOUN">noun</gram> <gram type="number">singular</gram>.
| <pos norm="NOUN">n.</pos> <pos norm="SING">s.</pos> | ||
| </gramGrp> | ||
| <pc>(</pc> | ||
| <etym><cit type="etymon" xml:lang="en"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are these etymologies or translation equivalents?
| <form><orth>mosaic</orth></form> | ||
| </cit><pc>;</pc> | ||
| <cit type="etymon" xml:lang="ge"> | ||
| <form><orth>Kleinmosaik, Mosaikfliese</orth></form> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Regardless of whether these are etymons or translationEquivalents, it would be better to put each of these words as <form><orth></orth></form>. Otherwise you would be implying that "Kleinmosaik, Mosaikfliese" is one word.
No description provided.