Home
An automated asynchronous Linked Data quality evaluation framework. __Because [5 stars](http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html) aren't enough.__
To realize its value, Linked Data must be used. But how good is any part of the linked data cloud? Does it suit best practices? Is it complete for a given application? Is it accurate, connected -- consistent? The DataFAQs linked data evaluation framework is being designed to provide automated, asynchronous feedback to Publishers, Curators, and Consumers about relevant portions of the cloud. Let's accelerate the health of Linked Data.
- Integration tools
- LOD Cloud on CKAN
- Validation tools
- SADI Semantic Web Services framework
- FAqT Service and vocabulary
- Sample FAqT deployment
- FAqT Brick of accumulated results
Why we're doing this:
About FAqT evaluation services:
- SADI Semantic Web Services framework - An existing web services framework (that finally got it right!)
- FAqT Service - SADI service that evaluates datasets
- Sample FAqT deployment
- FAqT Brick - accumulation of FAqT evaluations of datasets over time.
- FAqT Vocabulary - that FAqTs can/should use to be helpful in a DataFAQs environment.
- DataFAQs Core Services - FAqTs that provide configurations for a FAqT Brick.
About datasets:
- CKAN - An existing dataset cataloging architecture.
- CKAN lodcloud RDF vocabulary
- Missing CKAN API Key
- DCAT Data Catalog Vocabulary
- LOD Cloud
Some implementation details:
Related work:
- Pedantic Web Group
- Integration tools
- Validation tools
- Testing apparatuses
- frbr:lebo2012datafaqs