-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix loading in contracts table #2801
Merged
+34
−14
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -218,6 +218,18 @@ const nodeIDs = computed(() => { | |
return [...new Set(allContracts.value.map(contract => contract.details.nodeId) || [])]; | ||
}); | ||
|
||
function updateLoadingTableValue(updateAllTables: boolean, loading = true, contractType?: ContractType) { | ||
if (updateAllTables) { | ||
isLoadingNode.value = loading; | ||
isLoadingName.value = loading; | ||
isLoadingRent.value = loading; | ||
return; | ||
} else if (contractType == ContractType.Name) isLoadingName.value = loading; | ||
else if (contractType == ContractType.Node) isLoadingNode.value = loading; | ||
else if (contractType == ContractType.Rent) isLoadingRent.value = loading; | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
|
||
onMounted(onMount); | ||
|
||
async function onMount() { | ||
|
@@ -272,20 +284,11 @@ async function onMount() { | |
{}, | ||
); | ||
} | ||
isLoadingNode.value = false; | ||
isLoadingName.value = false; | ||
isLoadingRent.value = false; | ||
updateLoadingTableValue(true, false); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. IMO. To improve code readability and maintainability, consider introducing an object instead of using named parameters. // Define a type for the options
type ContractsLoadingOptions = {
updateAllTables: boolean;
loading: boolean;
contractType?: boolean;
}
function updateContractsLoading(options: ContractsLoadingOptions) {}
// Example call
updateContractsLoading({
updateAllTables: true,
loading: false,
}); |
||
} | ||
|
||
async function loadContracts(options: { page: number; itemsPerPage: number; contractType: ContractType }) { | ||
if (options.contractType == ContractType.Node) { | ||
isLoadingNode.value = true; | ||
} else if (options.contractType == ContractType.Name) { | ||
isLoadingName.value = true; | ||
} else { | ||
isLoadingRent.value = true; | ||
} | ||
|
||
updateLoadingTableValue(false, true, options.contractType); | ||
try { | ||
const { count, data: dataContracts } = await gridProxyClient.contracts.list({ | ||
twinId: profileManager.profile!.twinId, | ||
|
@@ -322,9 +325,7 @@ async function loadContracts(options: { page: number; itemsPerPage: number; cont | |
loadingErrorMessage.value = error.message; | ||
createCustomToast(`Error while listing contracts due: ${error.message}`, ToastType.danger, {}); | ||
} finally { | ||
isLoadingNode.value = false; | ||
isLoadingName.value = false; | ||
isLoadingRent.value = false; | ||
updateLoadingTableValue(false, false, options.contractType); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you could do a switch on contractType if your actions are going to be different, and also you don't need elseifs in your code given you do a return already in updateAllTables so you can safely start a new if or a switch