-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 321
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Topology2: rename sof-lnl-rt712-rt1320x1 #9635
Topology2: rename sof-lnl-rt712-rt1320x1 #9635
Conversation
The rt1320 could use the same SoundWire link as rt712. In that case there is still one rt1320, but the NUM_SDW_AMP_LINKS should be 1. Name the tplg with the exact link number to avoid confusing. Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few double-check questions inline, but otherwise looks good.
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ SDW_JACK_OUT_STREAM=Playback-SimpleJack,SDW_JACK_IN_STREAM=Capture-SimpleJack" | |||
SDW_AMP_FEEDBACK=false,SDW_SPK_STREAM=Playback-SmartAmp,SDW_DMIC_STREAM=Capture-SmartMic,\ | |||
SDW_JACK_OUT_STREAM=Playback-SimpleJack,SDW_JACK_IN_STREAM=Capture-SimpleJack" | |||
|
|||
"cavs-sdw\;sof-lnl-rt712-rt1320x1\;PLATFORM=lnl,SDW_DMIC=1,NUM_SDW_AMP_LINKS=2,\ | |||
"cavs-sdw\;sof-lnl-rt712-l2-rt1320-l1\;PLATFORM=lnl,SDW_DMIC=1,NUM_SDW_AMP_LINKS=2,\ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess there's a matching kernel patch to updat ethe name and we haven't shipped this in sof-bin, so no problem to rename, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the corresponding kernel PR is thesofproject/linux#5223. And the tplg PR was just merged 3 days ago. #9632
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bardliao for CI, do you need this PR or kernel PR merged 1st ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't have any CI device with this configuration. So, it will not impact CI. However, I prefer merge kernel PR first to align the tplg name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could merge this PR as thesofproject/linux#5223 is merged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kv2019i good for you ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ack, was just waiting for the kernel part to be merged (which it is now).
The rt1320 could use the same SoundWire link as rt712. In that case there is still one rt1320, but the NUM_SDW_AMP_LINKS should be 1. Name the tplg with the exact link number to avoid confusing.