Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[IRC] Add a Link for the mandatory FixedConstraint #152
[IRC] Add a Link for the mandatory FixedConstraint #152
Changes from 1 commit
ceb0ca7
1726eba
67c3087
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what about initialization of the
FixedProjectiveConstraint
? Even if you call it,FixedProjectiveConstraint::init
can also fail, and there is no automatic mechanism to prevent invalidity of the scene. So, I am in favor of triggering an error without backup.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Problem is, if you dont create a fixedconstraint (i.e is null), as the IRC code is... let's say, not really solid 🤔, it will crash later on (not test on pointer here and there etc)
The creation here of FixedConstraint is not really intended to serve as a backup actually ; more as a way to not crash by itself 😅 Thats why there is a msg_error (and not a warning).
Or instead of crashing (if we dont do anything) we can do a
fatal()
or something like that... a graceful exitAnd as for the breaking, I agree and I assume that I wont do deprecation and stuff 🙊
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with both of you : @alxbilger for the analysis and @fredroy about the IRC component
Hard to decide which would be the better option.
I would vote for the simplest one (thinking about our future us debugging) : just an error, even if this leads to crashes (why not the fatal if it is slightly nicer)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To me the component should be emit an error and be set in invalid state.
Then the component state should be checked if it is valid.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is what I did few lines after (commented) but only a few functions in IRC does the componentState testing.
And I dont really want to update all the functions to add the test 🥸