fix: bugsnag event sent as an object for track call

[anantjain45823]

Description of the change

Resolves INT-752
For track call event sent as an object resulted in some alerts. This PR resolves those

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Related issues

Fix #1

Checklists

Development

• Lint rules pass locally
• The code changed/added as part of this pull request has been covered with tests
• All tests related to the changed code pass in development

Code review

• This pull request has a descriptive title and information useful to a reviewer. There may be a screenshot or screencast attached
• "Ready for review" label attached to the PR and reviewers mentioned in a comment
• Changes have been reviewed by at least one other engineer
• Issue from task tracker has a link to this pull request

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (99f39f5) 87.12% compared to head (3131ad7) 87.13%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2681   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    87.12%   87.13%           
========================================
  Files          639      639           
  Lines        28411    28409    -2     
  Branches      6735     6733    -2     
========================================
+ Hits         24754    24755    +1     
+ Misses        3329     3326    -3     
  Partials       328      328           

Files	Coverage Δ
src/v0/destinations/customerio/util.js	95.65% <100.00%> (+1.13%)	⬆️
src/v0/destinations/freshsales/transform.js	96.80% <100.00%> (+1.01%)	⬆️
src/v0/destinations/monday/transform.js	97.87% <100.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
src/v0/destinations/monday/util.js	96.61% <100.00%> (ø)
src/v0/util/index.js	87.69% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sanpj2292]

@anantjain45823
Let's write a common validator function for checking eventType. Ask everyone to only use it.

[anantjain45823]

We can have validation based upon message.type and basic request schema.
Does that sound good?

[sanpj2292]

We can have validation based upon message.type and basic request schema.
Does that sound good?

Let us solve this problem via a common validator. The other thing of basic request schema validation, let us do it later.

[anantjain45823]

We can have validation based upon message.type and basic request schema.
Does that sound good?

Let us solve this problem via a common validator. The other thing of basic request schema validation, let us do it later.

Done

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

100.0% Coverage
0.0% Duplication