Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Traducción tutorial/stdlib #2381
Traducción tutorial/stdlib #2381
Changes from 2 commits
5f62cb3
4c0e3da
16900c4
3b0214b
dce8810
6a6d468
ab824ef
2ef93db
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Me parece interesante el uso de "empaquetador" como traducción de "wrapper", tal vez podamos agregarlo a la memoria de traducción porque jsto tampoco está definido como un término que no se traduce.
Aunque no estoy muy seguro de qué tan apropiado sea.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
El problema que le veo con usar "empaquetador" es que es fácil de confundir con los "empaquetadores" como py2app, PyInstaller, etc.
En su tiempo pensamos en "envoltorio" pero nadie le decía así :P
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Entonces lo dejo como wrapper?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 a dejarlo como "wrapper".
He visto en varios lugares que se traduce y además se deja la palabra original para que se entienda.
Aquí y aquí por ejemplo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok chicos, sometamoslo a votación, pondre las siguientes opciones basadas en las observaciones
Estare atento a la votacion, gracias por la participación
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Creo que empaquetador y envoltorio me siguen sonando extraño, es otro +1 a dejarlo como wrapper.
Y de ser así, hay que agregarlo a "términos que no se traducen", podemos ir haciendo una revisión gradual para alinear todas las traducciones.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aquí algunas propuestas:
Revestidor: Tomando "revestimiento" pero dándole un giro más activo.
Cobijador: Inspirado en la idea de que un "wrapper" "cobija" o protege una funcionalidad.
Abrigador: Similar al anterior, con la idea de que el "wrapper" ofrece un "abrigo" a lo que envuelve.
Cubridor: Aludiendo a la acción de cubrir otra funcionalidad.