fix(tabs): [tabs] Adapt to the old theme style #2523
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve significant updates to the styling of the tabs component in three LESS files: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
bug
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/theme/src/tabs/vars.less (2)
Line range hint
1-14: Add documentation for new separator-related variablesSeveral new separator-related variables have been introduced, but they lack documentation explaining their purpose and usage. Consider adding comments in English (similar to the existing Chinese comments) for:
--tv-Tabs-header-separator-height--tv-Tabs-header-separator-padding-horizontal--tv-Tabs-small-item-font-size
Line range hint
1-168: Clean up transitional annotationsSeveral variables are marked with annotations like
(hide)or(new). These appear to be transitional markers and should be:
- Removed if they're no longer needed
- Converted to proper documentation if they indicate important information
- Tracked in a separate issue if they represent pending work
Examples:
// 标签页下拉框背景色(hide)// 分隔符高度(new)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/theme/src/tabs/index.less(0 hunks)packages/theme/src/tabs/vars.less(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/theme/src/tabs/index.less
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/theme/src/tabs/vars.less (1)
Line range hint 1-168: Verify comprehensive theme adaptation
Since this PR aims to adapt to the old theme style, let's verify that all necessary variables have been updated.
✅ Verification successful
Theme variables are consistently defined and properly referenced
After thorough verification of the theme variables in the tabs component:
- All CSS variables are properly defined in
vars.lesswith appropriate fallback values - Variables follow consistent naming patterns (--tv-Tabs-*)
- All defined variables are actively used in
index.less - Color variables properly reference the global theme tokens (tv-color-*)
- No conflicting or duplicate variable definitions were found
- All theme-related changes maintain backward compatibility with appropriate fallback values
The changes to the theme variables are comprehensive and well-integrated with the existing theming system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to the new theme style
# Search for potential theme-related variables that might need updating
rg -l "tv-color-(act|bg|text)" packages/theme/src/
# Look for any TODO comments or markers indicating incomplete theme adaptation
rg -i "(todo|fixme|xxx|hack)" packages/theme/src/tabs/
Length of output: 4331
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the theme variables more specifically for tabs component
# Check if there are any old theme variables that might conflict
rg "tv-color-(act|bg|text)" packages/theme/src/tabs/vars.less -A 1 -B 1
# Check for any potential inconsistencies in variable naming patterns
rg "^[[:space:]]*--tv-Tabs-.*:" packages/theme/src/tabs/vars.less
# Look for any references to these variables in the tabs implementation
rg "var\\(--tv-Tabs-" packages/theme/src/tabs/
Length of output: 23590
| @@ -152,7 +146,7 @@ | |||
| // 内容水平外边距 | |||
| --tv-Tabs-content-margin-horizontal: 0px; | |||
| // buttoncard类型标签栏背景色 | |||
| --tv-Tabs-button-card-nav-bg-color: var(--tv-color-bg-active, #f5f5f5); | |||
| --tv-Tabs-button-card-nav-bg-color: var(--tv-color-bg, #f5f5f5); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review color semantic usage in button-card navigation
The changes to button-card navigation colors raise some concerns:
- Using
--tv-color-success-bg-whitefor the active state (line 159) seems semantically incorrect, as this isn't indicating a success state. Consider using a more semantically appropriate variable like--tv-color-act-primary-bg-whiteor creating a new specific variable for this use case.
Also applies to: 159-159, 161-161
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/theme/src/tabs/vars.less (1)
Line range hint
149-167: Consider documenting theme migration impactsThe changes to color variables suggest a significant shift in the theming approach. Consider:
- Documenting these changes in the migration guide
- Adding comments explaining the semantic meaning of success vs primary contexts
- Updating any related theme documentation
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/theme/src/tabs/index.less(0 hunks)packages/theme/src/tabs/vars.less(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/theme/src/tabs/index.less
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/theme/src/tabs/vars.less (3)
Line range hint 1-167: Verify impact of removed border variables
The removal of several border-related variables (--tv-Tabs-item-bottom-border-*) suggests a change in the border styling approach. Please ensure:
- All border styles are now properly handled through the remaining variables
- No visual regressions in border appearances
- Theme customization capabilities are maintained
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the removed variables
rg --type=less "Tabs-item-bottom-border|Tabs-item-active-border-style" ./packages/theme/src/159-161: Review color scheme changes for active states
Several semantic color changes have been made:
- Active background color now uses
successcontext instead ofprimary - Active text color now uses a theme variable instead of a hardcoded value
These changes might affect:
- Visual consistency with other components
- Accessibility contrast ratios
- User experience in identifying active tabs
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent usage of success/primary context in active states
rg --type=less "tv-color-success-bg-white|tv-color-act-primary-bg-white-active" ./packages/theme/src/149-149: Verify the semantic meaning of the background color variable
The background color variable for button-card navigation has been changed from an "active" state color to a regular background color. This might affect the visual hierarchy and user interaction feedback.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the color variables to understand their usage and semantic meaning better.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the usage of these color variables across the component system.
The background color change is consistent with the design system
The change from --tv-color-bg-active to --tv-color-bg is actually correct and aligns with the design system's color usage patterns. The --tv-color-bg variable is consistently used across multiple components for default background states, including hover and non-interactive states (as seen in Tree, Transfer, CascaderNode, etc.). The variable is properly defined in the base theme with the intended semantic meaning of "通用背景色" (common background color) and is appropriately used for UI elements like panel backgrounds and default states.
- The variable is used similarly in other components like
Tree-node-content-hover-bg-colorandTransfer-panel-item-hover-bg-color - The fallback value of
#f5f5f5matches the documented color in the base theme - This change better reflects the semantic purpose of this UI element as a navigation container rather than an active state
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using these color variables to ensure consistency
rg --type=less "tv-color-bg-active|tv-color-bg[^-]" ./packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 1163
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the regular background color variable to understand its usage context
rg --type=less "tv-color-bg[^-]" ./packages/theme/src/
# Also search for any comments or documentation about these color variables
rg --type=less "tv-color-bg.*//.*|tv-color-bg.*\/\*.*\*\/" ./packages/theme/src/
Length of output: 4005
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/theme/src/tabs/vars.less (2)
Line range hint
149-161: Consider theme versioning strategyWhile adapting to the old theme style works as a short-term solution, consider implementing a proper theme versioning strategy to manage multiple theme variations. This could help prevent the need for direct modifications to accommodate different theme styles.
Potential approaches:
- Theme composition with fallbacks
- Theme version-specific variable sets
- Theme inheritance chain
Line range hint
1-168: Consider adding English translations for commentsThe variable descriptions are currently in Chinese. Consider adding English translations to improve international collaboration and maintainability.
Example format:
// 标签栏选中项边框色(除bordercard类) // Tab bar selected item border color (except bordercard type) --tv-Tabs-header-font-active-border-color: var(--tv-color-border-active, #191919);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/theme/src/tabs/index.less(0 hunks)packages/theme/src/tabs/vars.less(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/theme/src/tabs/index.less
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/theme/src/tabs/vars.less (1)
149-149: Review color variable updates
The changes to color variables appear to be adapting to a different theme style:
--tv-Tabs-button-card-nav-bg-colornow uses a more generic background color--tv-Tabs-button-card-item-active-bg-colorswitches to success-based white background--tv-Tabs-button-card-item-active-text-coloruses the primary action text color
These changes seem consistent with adapting to an older theme style as mentioned in the PR objectives.
Let's verify if these color variables are defined in the theme:
Also applies to: 159-159, 161-161
✅ Verification successful
Color variables are properly defined in the theme system
The verification confirms that all referenced color variables are properly defined in both the old theme (old-theme.less) and base variables (vars.less):
--tv-color-bgis defined as a common background color--tv-color-success-bg-whiteis defined as white background color--tv-color-act-primary-textis defined as primary text color
The changes in the tabs component correctly reference these theme variables, maintaining consistency with the theming system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the new color variables are defined in the theme
rg --type=less "tv-color-bg:|tv-color-success-bg-white:|tv-color-act-primary-text:" packages/theme/
Length of output: 934
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation