Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(RingTheory/Polynomial/HilbertPoly): the definition and key property of Polynomial.hilbertPoly p d for p : F[X] and d : ℕ, where F is a field. #19303

Closed
wants to merge 18 commits into from
Closed
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions Mathlib.lean
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4481,6 +4481,7 @@ import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Eisenstein.IsIntegral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.GaussLemma
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Hermite.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Hermite.Gaussian
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.HilbertPoly
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.IntegralNormalization
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.IrreducibleRing
Expand Down
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorial/BigOperators.lean
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ theorem prod_factorial_dvd_factorial_sum : (∏ i ∈ s, (f i)!) ∣ (∑ i ∈
· rw [prod_cons, Finset.sum_cons]
exact (mul_dvd_mul_left _ ih).trans (Nat.factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial_add _ _)

theorem ascFactorial_eq_prod_range (n : ℕ) : ∀ k, n.ascFactorial k = ∏ i ∈ range k, (n + i)
| 0 => rfl
| k + 1 => by rw [ascFactorial, prod_range_succ, mul_comm, ascFactorial_eq_prod_range n k]

theorem descFactorial_eq_prod_range (n : ℕ) : ∀ k, n.descFactorial k = ∏ i ∈ range k, (n - i)
| 0 => rfl
| k + 1 => by rw [descFactorial, prod_range_succ, mul_comm, descFactorial_eq_prod_range n k]
Expand Down
130 changes: 130 additions & 0 deletions Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/HilbertPoly.lean
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Fangming Li. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Fangming Li, Jujian Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Pochhammer
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.WellKnown
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp

/-!
# Hilbert polynomials

In this file, we formalise the following statement: if `F` is a field with characteristic `0`, then
given any `p : F[X]` and `d : ℕ`, there exists some `h : F[X]` such that for any large enough
`n : ℕ`, `h(n)` is equal to the coefficient of `Xⁿ` in the power series expansion of `p/(1 - X)ᵈ`.
This `h` is unique and is denoted as `Polynomial.hilbertPoly p d`.

For example, given `d : ℕ`, the power series expansion of `1/(1-X)ᵈ⁺¹` in `F[X]` is
`Σₙ ((d + n).choose d)Xⁿ`, which equals `Σₙ ((n + 1)···(n + d)/d!)Xⁿ` and hence
`Polynomial.hilbertPoly (1 : F[X]) d` is the polynomial `(n + 1)···(n + d)/d!`. Note that
if `d! = 0` in `F`, then the polynomial `(n + 1)···(n + d)/d!` no longer works, so we do not
want the characteristic of `F` to be divisible by `d!`. As `Polynomial.hilbertPoly` may take
any `p : F[X]` and `d : ℕ` as its inputs, it is necessary for us to assume that `CharZero F`.

## Main definitions

* `Polynomial.hilbertPoly p d`. Given a field `F`, a polynomial `p : F[X]` and a natural number `d`,
if `F` is of characteristic `0`, then `Polynomial.hilbertPoly p d : F[X]` is the polynomial whose
value at `n` equals the coefficient of `Xⁿ` in the power series expansion of `p/(1 - X)ᵈ`.

## TODO

* Hilbert polynomials of finitely generated graded modules over Noetherian rings.
-/

open Nat PowerSeries

variable (F : Type*) [Field F]

namespace Polynomial

/--
For any field `F` and natural numbers `d` and `k`, `Polynomial.preHilbertPoly F d k`
is defined as `(d.factorial : F)⁻¹ • ((ascPochhammer F d).comp (X - (C (k : F)) + 1))`.
This is the most basic form of Hilbert polynomials. `Polynomial.preHilbertPoly ℚ d 0`
is exactly the Hilbert polynomial of the polynomial ring `ℚ[X_0,...,X_d]` viewed as
a graded module over itself. In fact, `Polynomial.preHilbertPoly F d k` is the
same as `Polynomial.hilbertPoly ((X : F[X]) ^ k) (d + 1)` for any field `F` and
`d k : ℕ` (see the lemma `Polynomial.hilbertPoly_X_pow_succ`). See also the lemma
`Polynomial.preHilbertPoly_eq_choose_sub_add`, which states that if `CharZero F`,
then for any `d k n : ℕ` with `k ≤ n`, `(Polynomial.preHilbertPoly F d k).eval (n : F)`
equals `(n - k + d).choose d`.
-/
noncomputable def preHilbertPoly (d k : ℕ) : F[X] :=
(d.factorial : F)⁻¹ • ((ascPochhammer F d).comp (Polynomial.X - (C (k : F)) + 1))

lemma preHilbertPoly_eq_choose_sub_add [CharZero F] (d : ℕ) {k n : ℕ} (hkn : k ≤ n):
(preHilbertPoly F d k).eval (n : F) = (n - k + d).choose d := by
have : ((d ! : ℕ) : F) ≠ 0 := by norm_cast; positivity
calc
_ = (↑d !)⁻¹ * eval (↑(n - k + 1)) (ascPochhammer F d) := by simp [cast_sub hkn, preHilbertPoly]
_ = (n - k + d).choose d := by
rw [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_natCast_ascFactorial];
field_simp [ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose]

variable {F}

/--
`Polynomial.hilbertPoly p 0 = 0`; for any `d : ℕ`, `Polynomial.hilbertPoly p (d + 1)`
is defined as `∑ i in p.support, (p.coeff i) • Polynomial.preHilbertPoly F d i`. If
`M` is a graded module whose Poincaré series can be written as `p(X)/(1 - X)ᵈ` for some
`p : ℚ[X]` with integer coefficients, then `Polynomial.hilbertPoly p d` is the Hilbert
polynomial of `M`. See also `Polynomial.coeff_mul_invOneSubPow_eq_hilbertPoly_eval`,
which says that `PowerSeries.coeff F n (p * (PowerSeries.invOneSubPow F d))` equals
`(Polynomial.hilbertPoly p d).eval (n : F)` for any large enough `n : ℕ`.
-/
noncomputable def hilbertPoly (p : F[X]) : (d : ℕ) → F[X]
| 0 => 0
| d + 1 => ∑ i in p.support, (p.coeff i) • preHilbertPoly F d i

variable (F) in
lemma hilbertPoly_zero_nat (d : ℕ) : hilbertPoly (0 : F[X]) d = 0 := by
delta hilbertPoly; induction d with
| zero => simp only
| succ d _ => simp only [coeff_zero, zero_smul, Finset.sum_const_zero]

lemma hilbertPoly_poly_zero (p : F[X]) : hilbertPoly p 0 = 0 := rfl

lemma hilbertPoly_poly_succ (p : F[X]) (d : ℕ) :
hilbertPoly p (d + 1) = ∑ i in p.support, (p.coeff i) • preHilbertPoly F d i := rfl

variable (F) in
lemma hilbertPoly_X_pow_succ (d k : ℕ) :
hilbertPoly ((X : F[X]) ^ k) (d + 1) = preHilbertPoly F d k := by
delta hilbertPoly; simp

/--
The key property of Hilbert polynomials. If `F` is a field with characteristic `0`, `p : F[X]` and
`d : ℕ`, then for any large enough `n : ℕ`, `(Polynomial.hilbertPoly p d).eval (n : F)` equals the
coefficient of `Xⁿ` in the power series expansion of `p/(1 - X)ᵈ`.
-/
theorem coeff_mul_invOneSubPow_eq_hilbertPoly_eval
[CharZero F] {p : F[X]} (d : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (hn : p.natDegree < n) :
PowerSeries.coeff F n (p * (invOneSubPow F d)) = (hilbertPoly p d).eval (n : F) := by
delta hilbertPoly; induction d with
| zero => simp only [invOneSubPow_zero, Units.val_one, mul_one, coeff_coe, eval_zero]
exact coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt hn
| succ d hd =>
simp only [eval_finset_sum, eval_smul, smul_eq_mul]
rw [← Finset.sum_coe_sort]
have h_le (i : p.support) : (i : ℕ) ≤ n :=
le_trans (le_natDegree_of_ne_zero <| mem_support_iff.1 i.2) hn.le
have h (i : p.support) : eval ↑n (preHilbertPoly F d ↑i) = (n + d - ↑i).choose d := by
rw [preHilbertPoly_eq_choose_sub_add _ _ (h_le i), Nat.sub_add_comm (h_le i)]
simp_rw [h]
rw [Finset.sum_coe_sort _ (fun x => (p.coeff ↑x) * (_ + d - ↑x).choose _),
PowerSeries.coeff_mul, Finset.Nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ_mk,
invOneSubPow_val_eq_mk_sub_one_add_choose_of_pos _ _ (zero_lt_succ d)]
simp only [coeff_coe, coeff_mk]
symm
refine Finset.sum_subset_zero_on_sdiff (fun s hs ↦ ?_) (fun x hx ↦ ?_) (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
· rw [Finset.mem_range_succ_iff]
exact h_le ⟨s, hs⟩
· simp only [Finset.mem_sdiff, mem_support_iff, not_not] at hx
rw [hx.2, zero_mul]
· rw [add_comm, Nat.add_sub_assoc (h_le ⟨x, hx⟩), succ_eq_add_one, add_tsub_cancel_right]

end Polynomial
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Pochhammer.lean
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -153,10 +153,20 @@ theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial (n : ℕ) :
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right, eval_mul, ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial n t, eval_add, eval_X,
eval_natCast, Nat.cast_id, Nat.ascFactorial_succ, mul_comm]

theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eq_natCast_ascFactorial (S : Type*) [Semiring S] (n k : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S k).eval (n : S) = n.ascFactorial k := by
norm_cast
rw [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial]

theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eq_descFactorial (a b : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer ℕ b).eval a = (a + b - 1).descFactorial b := by
rw [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial, Nat.add_descFactorial_eq_ascFactorial']

theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eq_natCast_descFactorial (S : Type*) [Semiring S] (a b : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S b).eval (a : S) = (a + b - 1).descFactorial b := by
norm_cast
rw [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_descFactorial]

@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_natDegree (n : ℕ) [NoZeroDivisors S] [Nontrivial S] :
(ascPochhammer S n).natDegree = n := by
Expand Down
5 changes: 2 additions & 3 deletions Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/WellKnown.lean
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -151,10 +151,9 @@ theorem invOneSubPow_inv_eq_one_sub_pow :
| zero => exact Eq.symm <| pow_zero _
| succ d => rfl

theorem invOneSubPow_inv_eq_one_of_eq_zero (h : d = 0) :
(invOneSubPow S d).inv = 1 := by
theorem invOneSubPow_inv_zero_eq_one : (invOneSubPow S 0).inv = 1 := by
delta invOneSubPow
simp only [h, Units.inv_eq_val_inv, inv_one, Units.val_one]
simp only [Units.inv_eq_val_inv, inv_one, Units.val_one]
erdOne marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

theorem mk_add_choose_mul_one_sub_pow_eq_one :
(mk fun n ↦ Nat.choose (d + n) d : S⟦X⟧) * ((1 - X) ^ (d + 1)) = 1 :=
Expand Down
Loading