-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 343
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(Analysis/BoxIntegral/UnitPartition): Prove results linking integral point counting and integrals #12405
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
UnitPartition
PR summary 06b4225384Import changes exceeding 2%
|
File | Base Count | Head Count | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.UnitPartition | 1892 | 1977 | +85 (+4.49%) |
Import changes for all files
Files | Import difference |
---|---|
Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.UnitPartition |
85 |
Declarations diff
+ ContinuousOn.continuousAt_mulIndicator
+ _root_.tendsto_card_div_pow_atTop_volume
+ _root_.tendsto_card_div_pow_atTop_volume'
+ _root_.tendsto_tsum_div_pow_atTop_integral
+ eqOn_mulIndicator'
+ eq_of_mem_smul_span_of_index_eq_index
+ integralSum_eq_tsum_div
+ mem_smul_span_iff
+ repr_isUnitSMul
+ setFinite_inter
+ smul
+ tag_index_eq_self_of_mem_smul_span
+ tag_mem_smul_span
You can run this locally as follows
## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>
## more verbose report:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>
The doc-module for script/declarations_diff.sh
contains some details about this script.
No changes to technical debt.
You can run this locally as
./scripts/technical-debt-metrics.sh pr_summary
- The
relative
value is the weighted sum of the differences with weight given by the inverse of the current value of the statistic. - The
absolute
value is therelative
value divided by the total sum of the inverses of the current values (i.e. the weighted average of the differences).
@MichaelStollBayreuth, I think I have addressed all of your comments. Thanks a lot for your extensive review! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me now.
maintainer merge
🚀 Pull request has been placed on the maintainer queue by MichaelStollBayreuth. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
bors d+
· rw [setIntegral_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one] | ||
|
||
private def tendsto_card_div_pow₁ {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) : | ||
↑(s ∩ c⁻¹ • L) ≃ ↑(c • s ∩ L) := |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
↑(s ∩ c⁻¹ • L) ≃ ↑(c • s ∩ L) := | |
↑(s ∩ c⁻¹ • L) ≃ ↑(c • s ∩ L) := |
✌️ xroblot can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
bors r+ |
…ral point counting and integrals (#12405) We prove the following result: > Let `s` be a bounded, measurable set of `ι → ℝ` whose frontier has zero volume and let `F` be a > continuous function. Then the limit as `n → ∞` of `∑ F x / n ^ card ι`, where the sum is over the > points in `s ∩ n⁻¹ • (ι → ℤ)`, tends to the integral of `F` over `s`. using Riemann integration. As a special case, we deduce that > The limit as `n → ∞` of `card (s ∩ n⁻¹ • (ι → ℤ)) / n ^ card ι` tends to the volume of `s`. Both of these statements are for a variable `n : ℕ`. However, with the additional hypothesis: `x • s ⊆ y • s` whenever `0 < x ≤ y`, we generalize the previous statement to a real variable. This PR is part of the proof of the Analytic Class Number Formula. Co-authored-by: Xavier Roblot <[email protected]>
Build failed: |
We prove the following result:
using Riemann integration. As a special case, we deduce that
Both of these statements are for a variable
n : ℕ
. However, with the additional hypothesis:x • s ⊆ y • s
whenever0 < x ≤ y
, we generalize the previous statement to a real variable.This PR is part of the proof of the Analytic Class Number Formula.