-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(web): charts-improvements #1780
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes implemented in this pull request focus on enhancing the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Code Climate has analyzed commit a194f04 and detected 0 issues on this pull request. View more on Code Climate. |
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/BarChart.tsx (1)
48-56
: LGTM! Efficient implementation of descending sort.The sorting implementation correctly maintains the relationship between labels and data while optimizing performance through memoization.
Consider extracting the sorting logic into a utility function for reusability:
+const sortChartData = (data: number[], labels: string[]) => { + const sortedIndices = data + .map((value, index) => ({ value, index })) + .sort((a, b) => b.value - a.value); + + return { + labels: sortedIndices.map((item) => labels[item.index]), + data: sortedIndices.map((item) => data[item.index]), + }; +}; const sortedData = useMemo(() => ({ - const sortedIndices = chartData.data - .map((value, index) => ({ value, index })) - .sort((a, b) => b.value - a.value); - - return { - labels: sortedIndices.map((item) => chartData.labels[item.index]), - data: sortedIndices.map((item) => chartData.data[item.index]), + ...sortChartData(chartData.data, chartData.labels), total: chartData.total, }), [chartData]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/BarChart.tsx
(3 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Chart.tsx
(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/TimeSeriesChart.tsx
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Chart.tsx (2)
91-98
: LGTM! Filtering zero-stake courts enhances data representation.
The implementation correctly filters out courts with no staked PNK, improving chart readability.
77-84
: LGTM! Filtering zero-value courts improves chart clarity.
The condition correctly filters out courts with no disputes, which aligns with the objective of improving visual representation.
Let's verify the data processing:
✅ Verification successful
These scripts will help us understand:
- How numberDisputes is used in the codebase
- Its type definition and initialization
- Similar BigInt processing patterns
This will allow us to verify if the filtering logic is implemented consistently and correctly.
Based on the comprehensive search results, I can now generate the final response:
Filtering zero-dispute courts is correctly implemented and consistent with the codebase
The implementation is verified to be correct for the following reasons:
- The
numberDisputes
field is properly typed asBigInt
in the GraphQL schema and correctly handled in the codebase - The BigInt comparison
BigInt(current.numberDisputes) > 0
is consistent with other BigInt operations throughout the codebase - The filtering logic aligns with how
numberDisputes
is used in other components for statistics and display purposes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any courts with zero disputes that might still appear
ast-grep --pattern 'numberDisputes = 0'
Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the context around numberDisputes usage
rg "numberDisputes" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 13133
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check the type definition and initialization of numberDisputes
ast-grep --pattern 'numberDisputes:'
Length of output: 36
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any other BigInt comparisons or processing
rg "BigInt\(" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 44595
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/BarChart.tsx (1)
109-116
: LGTM! Chart configuration properly implements sorting with visual improvements.
The Bar component correctly uses the sorted data and includes visual enhancements with border radius.
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/TimeSeriesChart.tsx (1)
51-52
: LGTM! Tick configuration improves date label readability.
The added configuration properly addresses the date label spacing issue:
autoSkipPadding: 10
ensures adequate spacing between labelsmaxRotation: 0
keeps labels horizontal for better readability
Let's verify there are no conflicting chart configurations:
✅ Verification successful
No conflicting chart configurations found
The search results confirm that the tick configurations (autoSkipPadding
and maxRotation
) are only used in TimeSeriesChart.tsx
and there are no conflicting settings elsewhere in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any conflicting tick configurations in other chart components
rg "autoSkipPadding|maxRotation" --type ts
Length of output: 207
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
closes #1767
closes #1768
PR-Codex overview
This PR focuses on enhancing the
BarChart
andChart
components with improved data handling and rendering. It includes optimizations for sorting data and conditional rendering based on values, as well as style adjustments in charts.Detailed summary
autoSkipPadding
andmaxRotation
toticks
inTimeSeriesChart
.sortedData
inBarChart
to sort chart data and labels.Bar
component inBarChart
to usesortedData
.Chart
to skip zero values fornumberDisputes
andstake
.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
BarChart
to display sorted data for improved clarity.TimeSeriesChart
for better control over x-axis tick labels.Bug Fixes
Chart
component to exclude entries with zero or negative values.Documentation