feat: new court page design, indicators refactor, court tabs bug fix, statdisplay refactor, appeal tab refactor, add new kleros logo #1781
Conversation
…bstitute current verdict compon
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve several modifications across various components in the codebase. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
❌ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools failed. Why did it fail? →
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
❌ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools failed. Why did it fail? →
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
web/src/components/Verdict/RulingAndRewardsIndicators.tsx (1)
Line range hint
21-31: Consider using enums for status text and colors.The implementation looks good and improves status clarity. Consider extracting the status text and colors into enums for better maintainability and reusability.
enum CaseStatus { CLOSED = "Case closed", IN_PROGRESS = "Case in progress" } enum StatusColor { CLOSED = "green", IN_PROGRESS = "blue" }web/src/components/Verdict/FinalDecision.tsx (1)
94-95: Add type safety for rounds array.Good use of memoization, but consider adding type safety:
const rounds = votingHistory?.dispute?.rounds as Array<{ jurorRewardsDispersed: boolean }> | undefined; const jurorRewardsDispersed = useMemo( () => Boolean(rounds?.every((round) => round.jurorRewardsDispersed)), [rounds] );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
web/src/components/DisputeView/CardLabels/Label.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/Verdict/FinalDecision.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/components/Verdict/RulingAndRewardsIndicators.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotingHistory.tsx(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Voting/VotingHistory.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- web/src/components/DisputeView/CardLabels/Label.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (2)
web/src/components/Verdict/RulingAndRewardsIndicators.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-19: LGTM! Clean imports and well-defined interface.
The addition of the Hourglass icon and maintained interface structure align well with the component's enhanced functionality.
web/src/components/Verdict/FinalDecision.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-24: Verify the necessity of isUndefined utility.
The isUndefined utility is used for null checks. Consider if a direct check would be more straightforward:
!disputeDetails?.dispute?.ruled === undefined… in explore, fix bug in court
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Description.tsx (2)
70-72: Add bounds checking to handleTabChangeThe function assumes the index will always be valid, but this might not be true if the tabs array changes.
Consider adding validation:
const handleTabChange = (index: number) => { + if (index < 0 || index >= TABS.length) return; navigate(TABS[index].path); };
99-99: Add a comment explaining the newline replacementThe
.replace(/\n/g, " \n")operation might not be immediately obvious to other developers.Consider adding a comment:
const formatMarkdown = (markdown?: string) => + // Add two spaces before newlines to ensure proper markdown line breaks markdown ? <ReactMarkdown>{markdown.replace(/\n/g, " \n")}</ReactMarkdown> : <StyledSkeleton />;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
web/src/assets/svgs/footer/secured-by-kleros.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/assets/svgs/header/kleros-court.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
web/src/components/Verdict/VerdictBanner.tsx(0 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Explore.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Description.tsx(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- web/src/components/Verdict/VerdictBanner.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Explore.tsx (2)
48-48: Verify layout consistency across viewports
The increased horizontal padding (from 8px to 10px) in landscape mode could affect the navbar's overall width and item alignment. Please ensure this change maintains consistent spacing across different screen sizes and doesn't cause wrapping issues.
Let's check for potential layout issues in other navigation-related components:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since I have enough information about the layout styles across the codebase:
Padding change is consistent with landscape mode styling patterns
The padding change from 16px 8px to 16px 10px in Explore.tsx follows the established landscape mode styling patterns across the codebase. The codebase shows consistent use of landscapeStyle for responsive adjustments, with similar padding values used in navigation components. This change maintains visual harmony with other landscape mode styles.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for related navigation components and their padding/spacing styles
# to ensure consistency across the codebase
# Search for styled navigation components with padding definitions
rg -l "padding.*px.*px" "web/src/layout/**/nav*.tsx"
# Search for other landscape style applications to verify consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'landscapeStyle($$$)'
Length of output: 46231
Line range hint 8-14: Consider impact of gap removal on mobile layout
The removal of the gap property from the Container component might affect vertical spacing in mobile view. Since this component uses flex-direction: column in mobile view, ensure that the spacing between navigation items remains visually balanced.
Let's check if similar spacing adjustments were made in related components:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the mobile layout and spacing in the Explore component and its direct siblings.
Let me check the specific styling patterns in the related navbar components to understand the spacing consistency.
Gap removal is properly compensated with margins and padding
The removal of the gap property is not a concern because:
- Child elements maintain proper spacing through
margin-bottom: 8px - Elements have appropriate padding (
padding: 8px 8px 8px 0in mobile,padding: 16px 10pxin landscape) - The spacing pattern is consistent with other navbar components like Menu and DappList which also use a combination of margins and padding for spacing
- The component properly handles responsive layout transitions between mobile (column) and landscape (row) modes
The visual balance in the mobile view is maintained through these alternative spacing mechanisms.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for similar flex container patterns to ensure consistent spacing approach
# Search for flex containers with gap properties
rg "gap:.*px" "web/src/layout"
# Search for similar flex column layouts
ast-grep --pattern 'styled.$_`
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
$$$
`'
Length of output: 1062
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the Explore component's context and its siblings in the navbar
rg -B 5 -A 10 "const Container = styled" "web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Explore.tsx"
# Check for media queries and responsive styles in the same file
rg "@media|landscapeStyle" "web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Explore.tsx" -A 3
# Check other components in the same navbar directory for spacing patterns
fd "\.tsx$" "web/src/layout/Header/navbar" --exec rg -l "landscapeStyle|@media.*flex"
Length of output: 1126
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check styling patterns in related navbar components
rg -B 2 -A 5 "styled\." "web/src/layout/Header/navbar/DappList.tsx" "web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Menu/index.tsx"
# Look for any margin or padding that might be compensating for gap removal
rg "margin|padding" "web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Explore.tsx"
# Check if there are any child components that might handle their own spacing
ast-grep --pattern 'styled.$_`
$$$
margin: $_;
$$$
`' "web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Explore.tsx"
Length of output: 2735
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Description.tsx (2)
76-76: LGTM! Well-structured routing logic
The routing implementation properly handles all cases including:
- Missing policy data
- Default navigation
- Consistent fallback behavior
Also applies to: 80-89
64-65: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider handling invalid path scenarios
The findIndex operation could return -1 if the current path doesn't match any tab paths, which might cause unexpected UI behavior.
Let's verify if there's proper error handling for invalid paths:
Consider adding a default fallback:
- const currentTab = TABS.findIndex(({ path }) => path === currentPathName);
+ const currentTab = TABS.findIndex(({ path }) => path === currentPathName) ?? 0;Also applies to: 68-69
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/ExtraStats.tsx (1)
86-92: Consider adding loading state and extracting messages.The conditional rendering logic is well-implemented and provides clear feedback. Consider these improvements:
- Extract the "No activity in this period" message to a constant/config for maintainability
- Add a loading state handler for better UX during data fetching
+ const NO_ACTIVITY_MESSAGE = "No activity in this period"; + const ExtraStats = () => { const [selectedRange, setSelectedRange] = useState(timeRanges[0].value); const data = useHomePageExtraStats(selectedRange); + const isLoading = !data.data; return ( <StyledCard> <ExtraStatsDisplay title="Activity" content={/* ... */} icon={LawBalance} /> + {isLoading ? ( + <StyledLabel>Loading...</StyledLabel> + ) : data.data?.mostDisputedCourt?.numberDisputes === 0 ? ( - <StyledLabel>No activity in this period</StyledLabel> + <StyledLabel>{NO_ACTIVITY_MESSAGE}</StyledLabel> ) : ( stats.map(/* ... */) )} </StyledCard> ); };web/src/hooks/queries/useHomePageBlockQuery.ts (1)
131-132: Good addition of fallback values, consider additional safeguards.The addition of
|| 0fallbacks effectively handles division by zero cases. However, consider adding additional safeguards:- const votesPerPnk = Number(court.numberVotes) / (Number(court.effectiveStake) / 1e18) || 0; - const disputesPerPnk = Number(court.numberDisputes) / (Number(court.effectiveStake) / 1e18) || 0; + const effectiveStakeEth = Number(court.effectiveStake) / 1e18; + const votesPerPnk = effectiveStakeEth > 0 ? Number(court.numberVotes) / effectiveStakeEth : 0; + const disputesPerPnk = effectiveStakeEth > 0 ? Number(court.numberDisputes) / effectiveStakeEth : 0;This refactor:
- Improves readability by extracting the denominator
- Explicitly checks for positive values
- Reduces repeated calculations
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
web/src/hooks/queries/useHomePageBlockQuery.ts(2 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/ExtraStats.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/ExtraStats.tsx (1)
20-24: LGTM! Clean and consistent styling.
The StyledLabel component follows good styling practices with appropriate font size, weight, and spacing.
web/src/hooks/queries/useHomePageBlockQuery.ts (1)
157-158: Consider similar safeguards for difference calculations.
The fallback values are good, but the calculations with average stake could benefit from similar safeguards as suggested above. Additionally, let's verify the usage of these calculations in the codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Stats.tsx (1)
136-141: Consider usingJurorIconfor "Active Jurors"The icon
PNKRedistributedIconmay not accurately represent "Active Jurors". UsingJurorIconwould provide a clearer visual representation.Apply this diff to update the icon:
- icon: PNKRedistributedIcon, + icon: JurorIcon,web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx (1)
75-91: LGTM: Well-structured responsive layoutThe new
StakePanelAndStatscomponent implements a robust responsive layout using flex and proper spacing. Consider extracting the magic numbers into theme constants for better maintainability.+ // Consider extracting these to theme constants - flex: 1 1 calc(50% - 12px); - max-width: calc(50% - 12px); + flex: 1 1 calc(50% - ${theme.spacing.medium}); + max-width: calc(50% - ${theme.spacing.medium});
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
web/src/components/StatDisplay.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Explore.tsx(0 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/InputDisplay.tsx(0 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/Simulator/index.tsx(0 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Stats.tsx(5 hunks)web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx(4 hunks)web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Stats.tsx(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/Simulator/index.tsx
- web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Explore.tsx
- web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/InputDisplay.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (17)
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/Stats.tsx (7)
1-2: Import statements are correctly updated
The added imports are appropriate and necessary for the component.
Also applies to: 6-6
42-45: Styling adjustments enhance component layout
The padding and margin changes improve the spacing within the StyledAccordion component, leading to a cleaner UI.
57-57: Padding adjustment in AllTimeContainer
The updated padding ensures consistent vertical spacing in the AllTimeContainer.
73-76: New AccordionContainer component added
Introducing the AccordionContainer helps in organizing the accordion items and enhances readability.
79-82: Refactored StyledCard for flexible layout
Changing StyledCard to a flex container with wrapping enhances responsiveness and displays stats effectively on various screen sizes.
98-100: Consistent unit display in stats
Appending units like PNK and ETH to the stats ensures clarity on the values being displayed.
Also applies to: 108-114, 122-125, 131-133, 157-159, 165-168
185-246: Verify the grouping of statistics is accurate
The grouping into "Parameters", "Activity", and "Total Rewards" improves data organization. Ensure that each stat is in the correct group and that the slice indices accurately reflect the intended stats.
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/StakePanel/index.tsx (2)
22-22: Verify layout changes in landscape orientation
Changing flex-direction to column in landscape mode may affect the user interface. Please verify that the component displays correctly on devices in landscape orientation.
Line range hint 77-77: Removal of width properties improves flexibility
By removing fixed widths, the layout becomes more responsive across different screen sizes.
web/src/components/StatDisplay.tsx (3)
4-15: Responsive adjustments for small displays
The implementation of the isSmallDisplay prop and the corresponding style adjustments enhance the component's adaptability to different screen sizes.
Also applies to: 18-40
43-47: Styled components updated for dynamic styling
Creating StyledTitle, StyledValue, and StyledUSDValue with conditional font sizes based on isSmallDisplay improves text readability on various devices.
Also applies to: 49-60
74-85: Updated StatDisplay component signature
Including the isSmallDisplay prop with a default value ensures backward compatibility while adding new functionality.
Also applies to: 96-101
web/src/pages/Home/CourtOverview/Stats.tsx (3)
2-2: Cleaned up imports
Removing the unused css import from styled-components reduces clutter.
27-28: Adjusted StyledCard spacing
Updating the gap and padding improves the overall layout and visual spacing between elements.
102-102: Explicitly setting isSmallDisplay to false
Specifying isSmallDisplay={false} ensures consistent styling and makes the prop's usage clear.
web/src/pages/Courts/CourtDetails/index.tsx (2)
23-23: LGTM: Import and styling changes
The addition of the Divider component and margin adjustment contribute to a more consistent layout structure.
Also applies to: 37-37
126-130: Verify courtName prop handling
The layout structure looks good, but let's verify the courtName prop handling in case of loading or error states.
✅ Verification successful
From the search results, I can see that the StakePanel component properly handles the courtName prop with a default value:
const StakePanel: React.FC<{ courtName: string }> = ({ courtName = "General Court" }) => {This shows that:
- The prop is properly typed as a required string
- There's a default value "General Court" if the prop is undefined
- The component has proper type safety
The courtName prop handling is implemented correctly
The component has proper type safety and fallback handling, making it resilient to loading or error states by providing a default value. The layout changes are well-structured and the prop passing is implemented safely.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check StakePanel component for courtName prop handling
ast-grep --pattern 'interface Props {
$$$
courtName?: $_
$$$
}'
# Check for null checks or loading states
ast-grep --pattern 'const StakePanel = ({ courtName }: Props) => {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 149
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for StakePanel component definition and usage
rg -A 10 "StakePanel" --type tsx
# Also search for any Props or interfaces related to StakePanel
rg "interface.*StakePanel" --type tsx
# Look for courtName prop usage within StakePanel
rg "courtName" --type tsx
Length of output: 182
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for StakePanel component definition and usage without file type restriction
rg -A 10 "StakePanel"
# Look for courtName prop usage
rg "courtName"
# Find all TypeScript/React files that might contain the StakePanel component
fd -e tsx -e ts
Length of output: 87541
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/Classic/Options/StageOne.tsx (2)
21-23: LGTM! Improved responsive layout implementation.The transition from flexbox to CSS Grid with
auto-fitandminmaxprovides better responsiveness and consistent card sizing across different screen sizes. The reduced gap also creates a more cohesive visual rhythm.Consider documenting these spacing values (16px, 250px) in a design system constants file for better maintainability and consistency across components.
Line range hint
39-40: Add proper accessibility attributes to the label element.The label element should be associated with its form controls using either the
htmlForattribute or by wrapping the form control. This improves screen reader accessibility.- <label> Which option do you want to fund? </label> + <label id="options-label" className="options-heading"> Which option do you want to fund? </label> <OptionsContainer role="radiogroup" aria-labelledby="options-label">
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/AppealHistory.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/Classic/Options/StageOne.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/Classic/Options/StageTwo.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/AppealHistory.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/Classic/Options/StageTwo.tsx (1)
23-25: LGTM! Improved responsive layout implementation.
The transition from flexbox to CSS Grid with auto-fit and minmax provides better responsive behavior. The standardized 16px gap maintains consistency with the design system.
Let's verify the consistency of this layout pattern across related components:
✅ Verification successful
Layout standardization verified across appeal stages
The verification confirms that both StageOne and StageTwo components use identical grid layouts with:
display: gridgrid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(250px, 1fr))gap: 16pxmargin-top: 12px
This demonstrates consistent implementation of the responsive grid pattern across appeal stages.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar grid layout implementations in related components
# Expected: Should find similar grid layouts in StageOne and AppealHistory
# Search for grid layout implementations
rg -A 3 "display: grid" "web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Appeal/Classic"
# Search for OptionsContainer styled components
ast-grep --pattern 'const OptionsContainer = styled.$_`
$$$
`'
Length of output: 912
kemuru
changed the title
kemuru
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
web/src/utils/userLevelCalculation.ts (1)
29-35: Consider consolidating level 0 logic with other levelsThe separate check for level 0 creates code duplication with similar conditions. Consider refactoring to make the logic more maintainable.
Here's a suggested approach:
export const getUserLevelData = (coherenceScore: number, totalResolvedDisputes: number) => { - for (const criteria of levelCriteria) { + // Sort criteria by level in descending order to prioritize higher levels + const sortedCriteria = [...levelCriteria].sort((a, b) => b.level - a.level); + for (const criteria of sortedCriteria) { if ( - criteria.level > 0 && totalResolvedDisputes >= criteria.minDisputes && coherenceScore >= criteria.minScore && coherenceScore <= criteria.maxScore ) { return criteria; } } - if ( - totalResolvedDisputes >= levelCriteria[0].minDisputes && - coherenceScore >= levelCriteria[0].minScore && - coherenceScore <= levelCriteria[0].maxScore - ) { - return levelCriteria[0]; - } return levelCriteria.find(({ level }) => level === 1); };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
web/src/utils/userLevelCalculation.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/src/utils/userLevelCalculation.ts (1)
20-26: Verify the impact of excluding level 0 from the main loop
The addition of criteria.level > 0 changes the evaluation order, making level 0 a special case that's only checked after higher levels. This means a user meeting criteria for both level 0 and a higher level will always get the higher level, which seems intentional but should be verified.
Run the following script to check if this matches the intended behavior:
✅ Verification successful
The level evaluation logic is correctly implemented and intentional
After examining the complete implementation, the separation of level 0 (Diogenes) from the main evaluation loop is correct and well-designed because:
- The code first checks for higher levels (1-4) in descending order, which is intentional as it prioritizes assigning the highest level a user qualifies for
- Level 0 (Diogenes) is specifically checked afterward for users with low coherence scores (0-49) who have resolved at least 3 disputes
- Level 1 (Pythagoras) serves as the default fallback level, which is appropriate as it has no minimum dispute requirement
The logic ensures:
- Users meeting criteria for multiple levels get the highest one
- Level 0 is reserved only for those who don't qualify for any higher level but meet its specific criteria
- Everyone else defaults to Level 1 (Pythagoras)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for tests or documentation that might specify the intended level assignment behavior
# Specifically checking if there are test cases for users meeting multiple level criteria
# Search for test files related to user levels
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts userLevel
# Search for documentation about level assignment rules
rg -i "level.*assignment|user.*level" -g "*.md"
Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the user level calculation logic
# Find the full implementation of userLevelCalculation.ts
cat web/src/utils/userLevelCalculation.ts
# Search for any test files that might contain "level" in their name
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts level
# Look for level-related constants or configurations
rg -l "level.*criteria|level.*config" --type ts
# Search for level-related function calls to understand usage
ast-grep --pattern 'getUserLevel($$$)'
Length of output: 1358
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit cb93e87 and detected 11 issues on this pull request. Here's the issue category breakdown:
View more on Code Climate. |
|
also fixed this issue #1766
and a bug where the juror level was lower than it should, a beta feedback user noticed me
PR-Codex overview
This PR primarily focuses on improving the styling and layout of various components across the application, particularly in the
styled-componentsusage. It also updates some logic and imports, enhancing the overall user interface and experience.Detailed summary
VerdictBanner.tsx.gapproperties in severalstyled.divcomponents.flextogridin multipleOptionsContainercomponents.margin-bottomandpaddingvalues in various components.RulingAndRewardsIndicatorslogic and labels.StatDisplaycomponent with new props for responsive display.Statscomponent to improve data display and organization.Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
isSmallDisplayprop to StatDisplay for improved responsiveness.Bug Fixes
Refactor