Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Payable Feature #2
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Payable Feature #2
Changes from 6 commits
c6a6a06
9efc4c5
aaae2ad
79a3834
690b98d
d5f077f
4b6d77e
669c5c0
2231e86
56e199b
4efbf89
66c45d6
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If
destination
includes field references, won't those be added in here as well, not just parameters?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to clarify, is this if
destination
is of typestruct
? If so, yeah that's correctly, I'll be have to mindful of that when parsing and figuring out which variable within the struct's fields should be payable.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was just pointing out that this method is called
extractPayableParams
but here, when you useextractVarNames
ondestination
, I don't think it would properly distinguish between fields and parameters.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ohh gotcha, yes yes that makes sense. Before I think the resolution was that I'd just union it with the set of parameters of that transition, but admittedly that's not a very good solution. For the current version, I check for whether the variable is a parameter or field before adding it 👍