Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tbv2: implement folly::IOBuf #437

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2023

Conversation

JakeHillion
Copy link
Contributor

@JakeHillion JakeHillion commented Dec 20, 2023

tbv2: implement folly::IOBuf

folly::IOBuf does not have TreeBuilder v2 container support. Add it.

The implementation is a direct clone of v1. It still lacks tests.

Test Plan:


Stack created with Sapling. Best reviewed with ReviewStack.

folly::IOBuf does not have TreeBuilder v2 container support. Add it.

The implementation is a direct clone of v1. It still lacks tests.

Test Plan:
- It codegens on a prod type.
- No runtime testing... Bad form, I know.
- Issue created to add integration tests: facebookexperimental#436
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (55989a9) 44.63% compared to head (e431c00) 44.63%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #437   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   44.63%   44.63%           
=======================================
  Files         121      121           
  Lines       11902    11902           
  Branches     1946     1946           
=======================================
  Hits         5313     5313           
  Misses       5737     5737           
  Partials      852      852           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@JakeHillion JakeHillion merged commit 5a2ca8b into facebookexperimental:main Dec 20, 2023
13 checks passed
@JakeHillion JakeHillion deleted the pr437 branch December 20, 2023 16:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants