-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 599
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RISC-V port fixes (part I) #2518
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I merged it because I was thinking that I'd reviewed it already.
I think this munamp can unmap something useful and trigger sigsegv.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, actually, we are using the same approach for other architectures:
criu/compel/arch/arm/src/lib/infect.c
Line 184 in 1452c76
criu/compel/arch/ppc64/src/lib/infect.c
Line 507 in 1452c76
But that's an interesting point and probably I should try to find a cleaner way to determine a task size across all architectures we have then.
But taking into account that it's not a new and dirty hack I introduced but rather reusing an existing and time-proven method I think it's good enough to be there.
Upd: A first thing that comes into my mind is to replace
munmap
with some "safer" syscall likemadvise
. But it's still requires investigation...Upd: we can also do
mmap
beforemunmap
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can do something like this: https://cs.opensource.google/gvisor/gvisor/+/master:pkg/abi/linux/mm.go;l=142?q=tasksize&ss=gvisor%2Fgvisor