-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bal 2983 - Lack of Session Expiration on dev env #2894
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe changes made in the Changes
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
services/workflows-service/src/main.ts (1)
101-104
: Consider additional security enhancementsWhile the current changes improve security, consider these additional enhancements:
- Add explicit
domain
restriction to prevent cookie exposure across subdomains- Add
path
attribute to limit cookie scope- Consider making
secure
environment-dependent likehttpOnly
to support local developmentExample implementation:
cookieSession({ name: 'session', keys: [env.SESSION_SECRET], httpOnly: env.ENVIRONMENT_NAME !== 'local', - secure: true, + secure: env.ENVIRONMENT_NAME !== 'local', sameSite: env.ENVIRONMENT_NAME !== 'local' ? 'strict' : 'lax', maxAge: 1000 * 60 * env.SESSION_EXPIRATION_IN_MINUTES, + domain: env.COOKIE_DOMAIN, // Add to env variables + path: '/api', // Restrict to API paths }),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
services/workflows-service/src/main.ts
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
services/workflows-service/src/main.ts (2)
101-104
: Security improvements look good!
The changes enhance session security through:
- Setting
httpOnly
to prevent XSS attacks - Enforcing
secure
cookies for HTTPS-only transmission - Using appropriate
sameSite
policies to prevent CSRF attacks
101-104
: Verify security configuration completeness
Let's ensure the security changes are comprehensive across the application.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate a final response as I have gathered comprehensive information about the security configurations across the codebase.
Security configuration is properly implemented
The security measures in the codebase are comprehensive and well-configured:
- Cookie security is properly handled with
httpOnly
,secure
, andsameSite
options in the main application - Security headers are implemented using Helmet middleware
- CORS is properly configured with explicit allowed origins
- HTTPS is enforced in production environments with proper URL configurations
- No other cookie configurations found that require similar security settings
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify security-related configurations
# Check for other cookie configurations that might need similar security settings
echo "Checking for other cookie configurations..."
rg -l "cookie|Cookie" --type ts
# Check for proper session secret configuration
echo "Checking session secret configuration..."
rg "SESSION_SECRET" .env* || echo "No .env files found"
# Check for HTTPS enforcement
echo "Checking HTTPS enforcement..."
rg "https?://" --type ts
# Check for potential security middleware usage
echo "Checking security middleware..."
rg "helmet|cors|csurf" --type ts
Length of output: 47013
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
services/workflows-service/src/auth/session-serializer.ts (1)
51-51
: Consider the implications of switching fromselect
toinclude
While both approaches achieve similar results, using
include
might load more data than necessary. Theselect
approach is generally more efficient as it explicitly specifies the required fields.Consider reverting to the more precise
select
approach:-include: { userToProjects: { select: { projectId: true } } }, +select: { userToProjects: { select: { projectId: true } } },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
services/workflows-service/src/auth/session-serializer.ts
(1 hunks)services/workflows-service/src/main.ts
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- services/workflows-service/src/main.ts
🔇 Additional comments (2)
services/workflows-service/src/auth/session-serializer.ts (2)
Line range hint 37-42
: LGTM: Proper session expiration handling
The session expiration check is properly implemented, validating both the existence of expiration time and comparing it with the current time before proceeding with deserialization.
51-51
: Verify query performance impact
Let's verify if the change from select
to include
affects query performance.
✅ Verification successful
No performance concerns with the query pattern
The query pattern using include
with nested select
is appropriate here as it:
- Only fetches the minimal required data (
projectId
) from the relateduserToProjects
records - Is used in a single user context (deserializeUser) where the relationship data is necessary
- Follows Prisma's recommended approach for efficient relationship loading
The query is well-optimized by selecting only the needed fields and using proper relationship loading strategy.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar patterns to understand the established querying pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'userToProjects: { $$$: { $$$: true } }'
# Look for performance-related comments or issues
rg -i "performance.*userToProjects|slow.*query"
Length of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for userToProjects usage patterns
rg "userToProjects.*select|userToProjects.*include" -A 2
# Also search for Prisma query patterns in the same file
fd "session-serializer.ts" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 2436
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes