Navbar link's scroll position resolved. #194
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve the addition of a new CSS class Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for submitting your pull request! 🙌 We'll review it as soon as possible. In the meantime, please ensure that your changes align with our CONTRIBUTING.md. If there are any specific instructions or feedback regarding your PR, we'll provide them here. Thanks again for your contribution! 😊 |
|
@Ashwinib26 is attempting to deploy a commit to the bunty's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (18)
frontend/src/components/Pages/Home.jsx (1)
6-6: LGTM! Consider reordering imports.The import statement for React and useEffect is correct and necessary for the changes made. However, it's often a good practice to place React imports at the top of the file.
Consider moving this import statement to the top of the file:
+import React, { useEffect } from 'react'; import Landing from "../ui/Landing"; import ReviewCarousel from "../ui/ReviewCarousel"; import FeedbackForm from "../ui/FeedbackForm"; import About from "./About"; -import React, { useEffect } from 'react';frontend/src/components/Pages/Pages.jsx (2)
2-2: Remove unused importuseStateThe
useStatehook is imported but not used in this component. To maintain clean and efficient code, it's best to remove unused imports.Apply this change:
-import React, { useState , useEffect , forwardRef } from 'react'; +import React, { useEffect , forwardRef } from 'react';
5-7: Approved: Scroll to top functionality implemented correctlyThe
useEffecthook successfully implements the scroll-to-top functionality when the component mounts, addressing the PR objective.Consider the following enhancement for a smoother user experience:
useEffect(() => { window.scrollTo({ top: 0, behavior: 'smooth' }); }, []);This change would create a smooth scrolling effect instead of an instant jump, which might be more visually appealing in a single-page application context. However, the current implementation is correct and meets the stated requirements.
frontend/src/components/Pages/Notfound.jsx (2)
2-2: Remove unused import.The
useStatehook is imported but not used in this component. To keep the code clean and avoid potential linting issues, consider removing the unused import.Apply this change:
-import React, { useState , useEffect } from 'react'; +import React, { useEffect } from 'react';
5-7: LGTM! Consider extracting the scroll logic for reusability.The implementation correctly addresses the scroll position issue as described in the PR objectives. The
useEffecthook with an empty dependency array ensures that the window scrolls to the top only when the NotFound component mounts.For improved code organization and potential reusability, consider extracting this logic into a custom hook:
// In a separate file, e.g., useScrollToTop.js import { useEffect } from 'react'; export const useScrollToTop = () => { useEffect(() => { window.scrollTo(0, 0); }, []); }; // In Notfound.jsx import { useScrollToTop } from './useScrollToTop'; const NotFound = () => { useScrollToTop(); // rest of the component... }This approach would make it easier to apply the same scroll behavior to other components if needed.
frontend/src/components/Pages/About.jsx (2)
2-2: Consider removing unnecessary React importThe import of React is not necessary in modern React versions (17+) unless you're using JSX transform. If you're using a recent version of React, you can simplify the import statement to:
import { useEffect } from 'react';This change will make your code more concise without affecting functionality.
5-7: Approved: Effective implementation of scroll resetThe useEffect hook implementation effectively addresses the scroll position issue mentioned in the PR objectives. It ensures that the window scrolls to the top when the About component mounts, which is the desired behavior for navigation between pages in a single-page application.
As a minor suggestion for better code organization, consider extracting this logic into a custom hook or utility function, especially if you plan to reuse this behavior in other components. For example:
function useScrollToTop() { useEffect(() => { window.scrollTo(0, 0); }, []); } // Then in your component: export default function About() { useScrollToTop(); // rest of the component... }This approach would make the scroll reset behavior more reusable and keep your component code cleaner.
frontend/src/components/Pages/MyBook.jsx (1)
Line range hint
1-13: Consider some minor improvements for better code organization.While the overall structure is good, here are a few suggestions to enhance the code:
Consider moving the
BgTextureStyleobject to a separate styles file. This would improve code organization and separation of concerns.Review and clean up the imports. For example,
useStateis imported but not used in this file. Removing unused imports can help reduce bundle size and improve code clarity.If possible, consider grouping related imports together (e.g., all page components, all asset imports, etc.) for better readability.
Also applies to: 15-16
frontend/src/components/Pages/Menu.jsx (2)
31-33: Scroll-to-top functionality implemented correctly.The
useEffecthook successfully addresses the scroll position issue mentioned in the PR objectives. However, consider the following enhancement:Consider using the
scrollRestorationAPI for a more native-like scrolling experience:useEffect(() => { if ('scrollRestoration' in history) { history.scrollRestoration = 'manual'; } window.scrollTo(0, 0); }, []);This approach allows for better integration with browser navigation while still ensuring the desired scroll behavior.
63-66: Consider removing commented-out code.If the commented-out JSX for
MybookandTodaysSpecialcomponents is no longer needed, it's best to remove it entirely. This helps maintain code cleanliness and prevents confusion for future developers.If this code is being kept for reference or future use, consider adding a comment explaining why it's being retained.
frontend/src/components/Pages/Signup.jsx (1)
29-31: LGTM: Scroll position reset implemented correctlyThe
useEffecthook implementation correctly addresses the scroll position issue by resetting the window scroll to the top when the component mounts. This aligns with the PR objective and improves user experience.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this effect for better code readability:
useEffect(() => { // Reset scroll position to top when component mounts window.scrollTo(0, 0); }, []);Additionally, for better accessibility, you might want to consider using
window.scrollTo({ top: 0, behavior: 'smooth' })for a smoother scrolling experience. However, this is optional and depends on your project's UX requirements.frontend/src/components/Pages/Login.jsx (2)
44-46: Approved with a suggestion for accessibility consideration.The
useEffecthook implementation correctly addresses the scroll position issue as per the PR objective. It runs once when the component mounts, which is appropriate for this use case.However, consider the following accessibility suggestion:
Consider wrapping the
scrollTocall in arequestAnimationFrameto ensure it doesn't interfere with the browser's native scroll restoration:useEffect(() => { requestAnimationFrame(() => { window.scrollTo(0, 0); }); }, []);This approach is more respectful of user preferences and browser behavior, especially for users who rely on scroll position for navigation.
Line range hint
1-47: Suggestions for future improvementsWhile the current changes effectively address the scroll position issue, here are some suggestions for future improvements to enhance the overall functionality and user experience of the Login component:
Consider implementing more user-friendly error handling. Currently, errors are only logged to the console. Displaying error messages to the user would improve the user experience.
The API URL construction could be more robust. Consider using a configuration file or environment variables to manage API endpoints more effectively.
Add visible feedback during the loading state. The
isLoadingstate is set but not utilized in the UI. Consider adding a loading spinner or disabling the submit button while the request is in progress.These suggestions are not directly related to the current PR's objective but could be valuable for future enhancements.
frontend/src/components/Pages/TodaysSpecial.jsx (1)
55-71: LGTM with suggestion: Coffee Card enhancementsThe addition of hover effects and conditional rendering of prices improves the interactivity and visual appeal of the Coffee Card. The implementation is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.
Consider moving the inline style for
minHeightto a separate CSS file or a styled component for better maintainability. For example:import styles from './TodaysSpecial.module.css'; // In the JSX <div className={`${styles.card} bg-pink-100 p-4 rounded-lg shadow-lg max-w-xs text-center transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out transform hover:scale-105 mx-2`}> {/* Card content */} </div> // In TodaysSpecial.module.css .card { min-height: 300px; }This approach would keep your component cleaner and make it easier to manage styles across multiple cards.
frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (1)
36-38: LGTM: Scroll-to-top functionality implemented correctly.The
useEffecthook is correctly implemented to scroll to the top of the page when the component mounts. This addresses the PR objective of resolving scroll position issues when navigating between pages.Consider adding a focus management technique to ensure keyboard focus is also reset to the top of the page for improved accessibility. You could add:
document.body.focus();or focus on a specific element at the top of the page.
frontend/src/components/Pages/Event.jsx (1)
114-116: LGTM! Consider grouping related hooks.The implementation of the scroll-to-top functionality using
useEffectis correct and aligns with the PR objective. It effectively resolves the scroll position issue when navigating between pages.For better code organization, consider grouping this hook with other related useEffect hooks. For instance, you could place it right after the data fetching useEffect hook (around line 30) to keep all page initialization logic together.
frontend/src/components/Pages/Boardgame.jsx (2)
165-167: Approved with suggestions: Consider scroll behavior enhancements.The addition of the
useEffecthook to scroll to the top of the page on component mount addresses the PR objective of resolving scroll position issues. However, consider the following enhancements:
Use the
scrollRestorationAPI to manage scroll behavior more gracefully:useEffect(() => { if ('scrollRestoration' in history) { history.scrollRestoration = 'manual'; } window.scrollTo(0, 0); }, []);Consider implementing a more flexible scrolling solution that respects anchor links and deep linking scenarios. This could involve checking the URL for hash fragments before scrolling.
To avoid potential issues with back/forward navigation, you might want to use the
locationobject from react-router (if you're using it) to determine when to scroll:useEffect(() => { window.scrollTo(0, 0); }, [location.pathname]);These suggestions aim to improve the user experience while maintaining the desired scroll behavior.
1-1: Overall assessment: Changes address the scroll issue effectively.The modifications to the
Boardgamecomponent successfully implement the scroll-to-top behavior as intended, addressing the PR objective without disrupting the existing functionality. The changes are minimal and focused, which is commendable.For future improvements, consider:
- Extracting the scroll behavior into a custom hook (e.g.,
useScrollToTop) for reusability across components.- Implementing a more sophisticated scroll management system that takes into account various navigation scenarios (e.g., back/forward navigation, deep linking).
- Adding user preferences for scroll behavior, allowing users to opt-out of automatic scrolling if desired.
These suggestions aim to enhance the overall user experience and code maintainability in the long run.
Also applies to: 165-167
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
- frontend/src/App.css (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/About.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Boardgame.jsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Event.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Home.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Login.jsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Menu.jsx (3 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/MyBook.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Notfound.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Pages.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Signup.jsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/TodaysSpecial.jsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
frontend/src/App.css
[error] 42-42: expected
}but instead the file endsthe file ends here
(parse)
🔇 Additional comments (21)
frontend/src/components/Pages/Home.jsx (1)
9-11: LGTM! Consider accessibility implications.The useEffect hook implementation correctly addresses the scroll position issue mentioned in the PR objectives. It ensures that the page scrolls to the top when the Home component mounts, which is useful for navigation between pages.
However, consider the accessibility implications of automatically scrolling without user interaction. Some users might find this disorienting, especially those using screen readers or those with cognitive disabilities. Consider adding a skip link or allowing users to control this behavior.
To verify if this scroll behavior is consistent across the application, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify if other components have similar scroll-to-top behavior, ensuring consistency across the application.
✅ Verification successful
Script Adjustment Needed
The previous script encountered an error recognizing the
jsxfile type. Let's generate a new script that explicitly targets files with the.jsxextension.[/run_scripts]
Adjusting the Shell Script to Exclude Home.jsx Correctly
The previous script failed because the
--ignore-fileflag expects a file containing ignore patterns, not a single file to ignore. Let's update the script to properly excludeHome.jsxusing the-gflag with a negation pattern.[/run_scripts]
Scroll-to-Top Behavior Verified
The search confirmed that the
useEffecthook withwindow.scrollTo(0, 0)is only present inHome.jsx. There are no other components implementing this scroll behavior, ensuring consistency across the application.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent scroll-to-top behavior across components # Test: Search for useEffect hooks that scroll to top rg --type jsx -e "useEffect.*window\.scrollTo\(0,\s*0\)" -g '!Home.jsx'Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent scroll-to-top behavior across JSX components # Test: Search for useEffect hooks that scroll to top in .jsx files excluding Home.jsx rg -g "*.jsx" "useEffect.*window\.scrollTo\(0,\s*0\)" --ignore-file=Home.jsxLength of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent scroll-to-top behavior across JSX components excluding Home.jsx # Test: Search for useEffect hooks that scroll to top in .jsx files excluding Home.jsx rg -g "*.jsx" -g "!Home.jsx" "useEffect.*window\.scrollTo\(0,\s*0\)"Length of output: 70
frontend/src/App.css (2)
35-37: LGTM: Smooth transition effect added to.cardclass.The implementation of the
.cardclass with a transition effect is well-done. It provides a smooth animation for all properties, which will enhance the user experience when interacting with card elements.
35-42: Overall assessment: Good implementation with a minor fix needed.The additions to
App.csssuccessfully implement the desired visual enhancements for card elements. The transition and hover effects are well-defined and will contribute to a more interactive and visually appealing user interface.To ensure the CSS is fully valid, please add the missing closing brace as mentioned in the previous comment. Once this small fix is applied, the changes in this file will be complete and ready for merging.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 42-42: expected
}but instead the file endsthe file ends here
(parse)
frontend/src/components/Pages/Notfound.jsx (1)
Line range hint
1-28: Overall, good implementation with room for minor improvements.The changes successfully address the scroll position issue as described in the PR objectives. The implementation is clean and focused. Consider the suggested improvements to further enhance code quality and maintainability.
frontend/src/components/Pages/About.jsx (1)
Line range hint
1-62: Summary: Effective implementation of scroll reset functionalityThe changes in this file successfully address the PR objective of resolving scroll position issues when navigating between pages. The implementation is clean, follows React best practices, and should effectively improve the user experience by ensuring the page always starts at the top when the About component is rendered.
A few minor suggestions were made to further improve code quality and organization, but overall, the changes are approved and ready for merging.
frontend/src/components/Pages/MyBook.jsx (2)
45-47: LGTM! This change addresses the scroll position issue.The added
useEffecthook successfully implements the solution described in the PR objectives. It ensures that the window scrolls to the top whenever theMyBookcomponent is mounted, which will maintain the correct view positioning across all component pages.This implementation is correct and follows React best practices:
- It uses the
useEffecthook appropriately.- The empty dependency array ensures it only runs once on component mount.
- It doesn't interfere with the existing resize effect.
Line range hint
1-89: Overall, this is a solid implementation that effectively addresses the PR objectives.The changes introduced in this file successfully resolve the scroll position issue as described in the PR objectives. The implementation is clean, follows React best practices, and integrates well with the existing code.
Key points:
- The new
useEffecthook effectively manages scroll position.- Existing functionality, such as responsive sizing, remains intact.
- The overall structure of the component is maintained.
While there are minor suggestions for code organization, these are not critical and do not impact the functionality or performance of the component.
Great job on implementing this feature!
frontend/src/components/Pages/Menu.jsx (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The addition of
useEffectto the import statement is appropriate and consistent with its usage in the component.
Line range hint
1-78: Overall implementation aligns with PR objectives, with room for minor improvements.The changes successfully address the scroll positioning issue as mentioned in the PR objectives. The implementation of the
useEffecthook to scroll to the top on component mount is a good solution. However, there are a few points to consider:
- The suggested enhancement using
scrollRestorationAPI could provide a more robust scrolling experience.- The commented-out code should be removed or explained if it's being kept intentionally.
- The new layout structure for Mybook and TodaysSpecial components needs clarification, as it doesn't directly relate to the scroll positioning issue.
Once these points are addressed, the PR will be in good shape for merging.
67-72: New layout structure for Mybook and TodaysSpecial components.The new structure provides better control over the layout and spacing of these components. However:
Could you clarify the purpose of these layout changes? They don't seem directly related to the scroll positioning issue mentioned in the PR objectives.
The added bottom padding of 80px to the TodaysSpecial container might affect the overall page layout. Is this intentional?
To ensure consistency, let's verify if similar padding is applied in other components:
frontend/src/components/Pages/Signup.jsx (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement updated correctlyThe import statement has been properly updated to include
useEffectfrom React, which is necessary for the new functionality added to the component.
1-1: Summary: Scroll position issue successfully addressedThe changes made to the
Signupcomponent effectively resolve the scroll position issue as intended in the PR objectives. The implementation is clean, follows React best practices, and doesn't introduce any side effects or alter existing functionality.Key points:
- The
useEffectimport is correctly added.- The
useEffecthook is properly implemented to reset scroll position on component mount.- Existing component logic remains intact.
These changes should improve user experience by ensuring the page starts at the top when navigating to the signup page.
Also applies to: 29-31
frontend/src/components/Pages/Login.jsx (1)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The addition of
useEffectto the import statement is correct and necessary for its usage in the component.frontend/src/components/Pages/TodaysSpecial.jsx (5)
14-16: LGTM: Pricing information added to menu itemsThe addition of
originalPriceandofferPriceproperties to each menu item enhances the data structure and aligns with the PR objectives. The formatting is consistent across all categories.Also applies to: 19-21, 24-26
32-32: LGTM: Hover state management addedThe introduction of the
hoveredItemstate using the useState hook is a good approach for managing hover effects on menu items. This implementation follows React best practices.
74-90: LGTM: Food Card consistent with Coffee CardThe changes to the Food Card are consistent with those made to the Coffee Card, including hover effects and conditional rendering of prices. This consistency is good for maintaining a uniform user experience.
The suggestion about moving inline styles to a separate CSS file, as mentioned in the Coffee Card review, applies here as well.
93-109: LGTM with refactor suggestion: Drink Card consistent with other cardsThe Drink Card implementation is consistent with the Coffee and Food Cards, which is excellent for maintaining a uniform user experience.
The suggestion about moving inline styles to a separate CSS file, as mentioned in the Coffee Card review, applies here as well.
To reduce code duplication, consider creating a reusable
SpecialCardcomponent:const SpecialCard = ({ item, type, bgColor }) => { const [isHovered, setIsHovered] = useState(false); return ( <div className={`${bgColor} p-4 rounded-lg shadow-lg max-w-xs text-center transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out transform hover:scale-105 mx-2`} style={{ minHeight: '300px' }} onMouseEnter={() => setIsHovered(true)} onMouseLeave={() => setIsHovered(false)} > <img className="w-64 h-48 object-cover object-center rounded-md mb-4" src={item.image} alt={item.name} /> <h3 className="text-xl font-semibold">{item.name}</h3> <p className="text-gray-600">{item.description}</p> {isHovered && ( <div className="mt-4"> <p className="text-lg font-bold text-red-700 line-through">{item.originalPrice}</p> <p className="text-xl font-bold text-red-500">{item.offerPrice}</p> </div> )} </div> ); }; // Usage in TodaysSpecial component <SpecialCard item={todaysSpecial.coffee} type="coffee" bgColor="bg-pink-100" /> <SpecialCard item={todaysSpecial.food} type="food" bgColor="bg-teal-100" /> <SpecialCard item={todaysSpecial.drink} type="drink" bgColor="bg-pink-100" />This refactoring would significantly reduce code duplication and make future updates easier to manage.
Line range hint
1-115: Overall assessment: Good implementation with room for improvementThe changes made to the
TodaysSpecialcomponent successfully implement the desired functionality of displaying pricing information and adding hover effects. The code is consistent across all three card types (Coffee, Food, and Drink), which is good for maintaining a uniform user experience.Key points:
- The addition of pricing information to menu items enhances the data structure.
- The implementation of hover effects using React state is well done.
- The conditional rendering of prices on hover is correctly implemented.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Move inline styles to a separate CSS file or use styled components for better maintainability.
- Create a reusable
SpecialCardcomponent to reduce code duplication across the three card types.These improvements would enhance the code's maintainability and scalability without changing the current functionality.
frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (1)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been properly updated to include
useEffect, which is necessary for the new scroll-to-top functionality implemented in this component.frontend/src/components/Pages/Event.jsx (1)
Line range hint
1-283: Verify scroll behavior across different routes.The addition of the scroll-to-top functionality is a focused change that addresses the PR objective without introducing conflicts with existing code. The overall structure and logic of the
Eventcomponent remain intact.To ensure the scroll behavior works correctly across different routes, please run the following verification steps:
- Test navigation between different pages/routes that include the
Eventcomponent.- Verify that the page scrolls to the top when navigating to the
Eventcomponent from other pages.- Check that the scroll-to-top behavior doesn't interfere with other interactive elements on the page.
This script will help identify any inconsistencies in the implementation of the scroll-to-top functionality across the application and verify the proper usage of the
Eventcomponent.frontend/src/components/Pages/Boardgame.jsx (1)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been properly updated to include the
useEffecthook from React, which is necessary for the new functionality added to the component.
frontend/src/App.css
Outdated
| .card:hover { | ||
| box-shadow: 0 8px 16px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3); /* Add a shadow on hover */ | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved: Effective hover effect added to .card class.
The hover effect for the .card class is well-implemented. It adds a subtle box shadow that provides visual feedback when users interact with card elements, enhancing the overall user experience.
However, there's a minor issue to address:
The file is missing a closing brace } at the end. Please add it to properly close the .card:hover rule:
.card:hover {
box-shadow: 0 8px 16px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3); /* Add a shadow on hover */
}
+ }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 42-42: expected
}but instead the file endsthe file ends here
(parse)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Boardgame.jsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Login.jsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Signup.jsx (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Boardgame.jsx
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Signup.jsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
frontend/src/components/Pages/Login.jsx
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 'Link'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'Link' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 7-7: Shouldn't redeclare 'photo'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'photo' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 8-8: Shouldn't redeclare 'React'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'React' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 8-8: Shouldn't redeclare 'useState'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'useState' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
frontend/src/components/Pages/Login.jsx (2)
52-54: Effective implementation of scroll-to-top functionalityThe addition of the
useEffecthook to scroll to the top of the page when the component mounts is a good solution to the scroll position issue. This implementation ensures that users always start at the top of the page when navigating to the login page.
Line range hint
1-55: Overall assessment: Positive improvement with minor cleanup neededThe changes to the Login component successfully address the scroll position issue by implementing a scroll-to-top effect. This improvement enhances the user experience without altering the core functionality of the login process. The code structure remains clean and maintainable.
However, there's a minor issue with duplicate imports that needs to be addressed. Once the import statements are cleaned up as suggested earlier, this pull request will be ready for approval.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 'Link'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'Link' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 7-7: Shouldn't redeclare 'photo'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'photo' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 8-8: Shouldn't redeclare 'React'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'React' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 8-8: Shouldn't redeclare 'useState'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'useState' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
| import React, { useState , useEffect } from "react"; | ||
| import { Link } from "react-router-dom"; | ||
| import photo from "../../assets/login.png"; | ||
|
|
||
| import { Link, useNavigate } from "react-router-dom"; | ||
| import photo from "../../assets/login.png"; | ||
| import React, { useState } from "react"; | ||
| import { message } from "antd"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct useEffect import, but clean up duplicate imports
The addition of useEffect to the React import is correct. However, there are duplicate import statements that need to be addressed:
Please apply the following changes to clean up the imports:
-import React, { useState , useEffect } from "react";
-import { Link } from "react-router-dom";
-import photo from "../../assets/login.png";
-
import { Link, useNavigate } from "react-router-dom";
import photo from "../../assets/login.png";
-import React, { useState } from "react";
+import React, { useState, useEffect } from "react";
import { message } from "antd";This will remove the duplicate imports and consolidate them into a single, clean import section.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import React, { useState , useEffect } from "react"; | |
| import { Link } from "react-router-dom"; | |
| import photo from "../../assets/login.png"; | |
| import { Link, useNavigate } from "react-router-dom"; | |
| import photo from "../../assets/login.png"; | |
| import React, { useState } from "react"; | |
| import { message } from "antd"; | |
| import { Link, useNavigate } from "react-router-dom"; | |
| import photo from "../../assets/login.png"; | |
| import React, { useState, useEffect } from "react"; | |
| import { message } from "antd"; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 'Link'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'Link' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 7-7: Shouldn't redeclare 'photo'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'photo' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 8-8: Shouldn't redeclare 'React'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'React' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 8-8: Shouldn't redeclare 'useState'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'useState' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
|
@RamakrushnaBiswal , I have resolved the conflicts. |
|
|
||
| import React, { useState , useEffect } from "react"; | ||
| import { Link } from "react-router-dom"; | ||
| import photo from "../../assets/login.png"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Ashwinib26 you add twice it remove and follow code rabit suggestions
|
@Ashwinib26 also resolve the conflicts :) |
|
@RamakrushnaBiswal , I have resolved all the conflicts. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
frontend/src/components/Pages/TodaysSpecial.jsx (2)
14-26: LGTM! Consider using a centralized pricing configuration.The addition of
originalPriceandofferPriceto each menu item enhances the data structure and allows for more dynamic pricing display. However, hardcoding prices might make future updates challenging.Consider creating a separate configuration file for prices. This would make it easier to update prices across the application and potentially integrate with a backend API in the future. For example:
// prices.js export const PRICES = { coffee: { espresso: { original: 3.00, offer: 2.50 }, cappuccino: { original: 3.50, offer: 3.00 }, // ... }, // ... }; // TodaysSpecial.jsx import { PRICES } from './prices'; const menuItems = { coffee: [ { name: "Espresso", // ... originalPrice: `$${PRICES.coffee.espresso.original.toFixed(2)}`, offerPrice: `$${PRICES.coffee.espresso.offer.toFixed(2)}` }, // ... ], // ... };
57-74: LGTM! Consider moving inline styles to CSS classes.The addition of hover effects and conditional price display enhances the user experience. The implementation is clean and effective.
Consider moving the inline styles to CSS classes for better maintainability:
- Create a new CSS class for the minimum height:
.card-min-height { min-height: 300px; }
- Replace the inline style with the new class:
className="bg-pink-100 p-4 rounded-lg shadow-lg max-w-xs text-center transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out transform hover:scale-105 mx-2 card-min-height"This approach separates concerns and makes it easier to maintain consistent styling across components.
frontend/src/components/Pages/Boardgame.jsx (2)
2-2: Fix spacing in the import statementThe import statement has unnecessary spaces around the comma. Removing these spaces improves readability and adheres to standard coding conventions.
Apply this diff to correct the spacing:
-import React, { useState , useEffect } from 'react'; +import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
Line range hint
2-192: Consider externalizing theboardsdataThe
boardsarray contains extensive data hard-coded within the component. For better maintainability and cleaner code, consider moving this data to a separate file (e.g., a JSON file or a JavaScript module) and importing it.Here's how you might proceed:
Create a new file (e.g.,
boardsData.js) in an appropriate directory.// boardsData.js const boards = [ { src: '...', title: 'Monopoly', description: '...', instructions: [ '...', '...' ], }, // ... other board games ]; export default boards;Import the data into your component:
+import boards from 'path/to/boardsData';This approach enhances modularity and makes the component easier to read and maintain.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 194-194: Shouldn't redeclare 'handleCloseInstructions'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'handleCloseInstructions' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
- frontend/src/App.css (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/About.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Boardgame.jsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Event.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Home.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Login.jsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Menu.jsx (3 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/MyBook.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Notfound.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Pages.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Signup.jsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Pages/TodaysSpecial.jsx (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- frontend/src/App.css
- frontend/src/components/Pages/About.jsx
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Event.jsx
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Menu.jsx
- frontend/src/components/Pages/MyBook.jsx
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Notfound.jsx
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Pages.jsx
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Register.jsx
- frontend/src/components/Pages/Signup.jsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
frontend/src/components/Pages/Home.jsx
[error] 19-19: expected
}but instead the file endsthe file ends here
(parse)
frontend/src/components/Pages/Login.jsx
[error] 5-5: Shouldn't redeclare 'Link'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'Link' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 'photo'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'photo' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 7-7: Shouldn't redeclare 'React'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'React' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 7-7: Shouldn't redeclare 'useState'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'useState' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
frontend/src/components/Pages/Home.jsx (3)
6-6: LGTM: Import statement correctly added.The import for React and useEffect is correctly added. It's good practice to import React when using JSX, even though it's not strictly necessary in newer versions of React.
9-11: Great addition: useEffect hook addresses scroll position issue.The useEffect hook is correctly implemented to scroll the window to the top when the component mounts. This directly addresses the PR objective of resolving the navbar link's scroll position issue. The empty dependency array ensures it only runs once on mount, which is the desired behavior.
12-19: LGTM: Component structure maintained with improved formatting.The overall structure and functionality of the Home component remain intact. The minor formatting adjustments in the JSX enhance readability, which is a positive change.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 19-19: expected
}but instead the file endsthe file ends here
(parse)
frontend/src/components/Pages/Login.jsx (1)
51-53: Scroll to top implementation looks goodThe useEffect hook is correctly implemented to scroll the window to the top when the component mounts. This addresses the PR objective of resolving scroll position issues when navigating between pages.
frontend/src/components/Pages/TodaysSpecial.jsx (2)
32-34: LGTM! Good use of React hooks for hover state.The introduction of the
hoveredItemstate using theuseStatehook is a good approach to manage the hover state for each item. This allows for dynamic rendering of price information on hover.
Line range hint
1-121: Overall, good improvements with room for further refinement.The changes to the
TodaysSpecialcomponent significantly enhance its functionality and user experience. The addition of pricing information and hover effects provides more value to the user. However, there are opportunities for further improvement:
- Consider centralizing the pricing configuration for easier maintenance.
- Move inline styles to CSS classes for better separation of concerns.
- Refactor the repetitive card rendering code into a reusable component.
These refinements will improve code maintainability and scalability for future updates.
frontend/src/components/Pages/Boardgame.jsx (2)
113-120:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure consistent usage of image sources
In the
boardsarray, thesrcproperty for "Ticket to Ride" uses an imported image (board2), whereas other entries use URL strings. This inconsistency might lead to image loading issues.Check if
board2is correctly imported and used. If you intend to use imported images, ensure all images are imported and used consistently.You can standardize by either:
Importing all images at the top and using the imports:
// At the top of the file +import monopolyImage from 'path/to/monopolyImage.png';And in the
boardsarray:- src: "https://example.com/monopoly.png", + src: monopolyImage,Or replacing
board2with the image URL:- src: board2, + src: "https://example.com/ticket-to-ride.png",
51-187:⚠️ Potential issueEliminate duplicate
boardsarray declarationThe
boardsarray is declared here and then redeclared later in the code (after line 192). This duplication can cause inconsistencies and makes the code harder to maintain.Consider keeping only one declaration of the
boardsarray. You can remove this duplicate instance:- const boards = [ - // ... (entire boards array) - ];Likely invalid or redundant comment.
|
|
||
| import React, { useState , useEffect } from "react"; | ||
| import { Link } from "react-router-dom"; | ||
| import photo from "../../assets/login.png"; | ||
| import { Link, useNavigate } from "react-router-dom"; | ||
| import photo from "../../assets/login.png"; | ||
| import React, { useState } from "react"; | ||
| import { message } from "antd"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consolidate duplicate imports
There are several duplicate import statements that need to be addressed. This can lead to confusion and potential issues in the future.
Please apply the following changes to clean up the imports:
-import React, { useState , useEffect } from "react";
-import { Link } from "react-router-dom";
-import photo from "../../assets/login.png";
-import { Link, useNavigate } from "react-router-dom";
-import photo from "../../assets/login.png";
-import React, { useState } from "react";
+import React, { useState, useEffect } from "react";
+import { Link, useNavigate } from "react-router-dom";
+import photo from "../../assets/login.png";
import { message } from "antd";This will remove the duplicate imports and consolidate them into a clean, organized import section.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import React, { useState , useEffect } from "react"; | |
| import { Link } from "react-router-dom"; | |
| import photo from "../../assets/login.png"; | |
| import { Link, useNavigate } from "react-router-dom"; | |
| import photo from "../../assets/login.png"; | |
| import React, { useState } from "react"; | |
| import { message } from "antd"; | |
| import React, { useState, useEffect } from "react"; | |
| import { Link, useNavigate } from "react-router-dom"; | |
| import photo from "../../assets/login.png"; | |
| import { message } from "antd"; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 5-5: Shouldn't redeclare 'Link'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'Link' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 6-6: Shouldn't redeclare 'photo'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'photo' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 7-7: Shouldn't redeclare 'React'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'React' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 7-7: Shouldn't redeclare 'useState'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'useState' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
| {/* Food Card */} | ||
| <div | ||
| className="bg-teal-100 p-4 rounded-lg shadow-lg max-w-xs text-center transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out transform hover:scale-105 mx-2" | ||
| style={{ minHeight: '300px' }} // Ensure a minimum height for the card | ||
| onMouseEnter={() => setHoveredItem('food')} | ||
| onMouseLeave={() => setHoveredItem(null)} | ||
| > | ||
| <img className="w-64 h-48 object-cover object-center rounded-md mb-4" src={todaysSpecial.food.image} alt={todaysSpecial.food.name} /> | ||
|
|
||
| <h3 className="text-xl font-semibold">{todaysSpecial.food.name}</h3> | ||
| <p className="text-gray-600">{todaysSpecial.food.description}</p> | ||
| {/* Show prices below the image and description */} | ||
| {hoveredItem === 'food' && ( | ||
| <div className="mt-4"> | ||
| <p className="text-lg font-bold text-red-700 line-through">{todaysSpecial.food.originalPrice}</p> | ||
| <p className="text-xl font-bold text-red-500">{todaysSpecial.food.offerPrice}</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| )} | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className="card bg-pink-100 p-4 rounded-lg shadow-lg max-w-xs text-center"> | ||
| <img | ||
| className="w-64 h-48 object-cover object-center rounded-md mb-4" | ||
| src={todaysSpecial.drink.image} | ||
| alt={todaysSpecial.drink.name} | ||
| /> | ||
|
|
||
| {/* Drink Card */} | ||
| <div | ||
| className="bg-pink-100 p-4 rounded-lg shadow-lg max-w-xs text-center transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out transform hover:scale-105 mx-2" | ||
| style={{ minHeight: '300px' }} // Ensure a minimum height for the card | ||
| onMouseEnter={() => setHoveredItem('drink')} | ||
| onMouseLeave={() => setHoveredItem(null)} | ||
| > | ||
| <img className="w-64 h-48 object-cover object-center rounded-md mb-4" src={todaysSpecial.drink.image} alt={todaysSpecial.drink.name} /> | ||
|
|
||
| <h3 className="text-xl font-semibold">{todaysSpecial.drink.name}</h3> | ||
| <p className="text-gray-600">{todaysSpecial.drink.description}</p> | ||
| {/* Show prices below the image and description */} | ||
| {hoveredItem === 'drink' && ( | ||
| <div className="mt-4"> | ||
| <p className="text-lg font-bold text-red-700 line-through">{todaysSpecial.drink.originalPrice}</p> | ||
| <p className="text-xl font-bold text-red-500">{todaysSpecial.drink.offerPrice}</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| )} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication.
The implementation of the Food and Drink cards is nearly identical to the Coffee Card. This repetition might lead to maintenance issues in the future.
Consider creating a reusable SpecialCard component to reduce code duplication:
const SpecialCard = ({ item, type, bgColor }) => {
const [isHovered, setIsHovered] = useState(false);
return (
<div
className={`${bgColor} p-4 rounded-lg shadow-lg max-w-xs text-center transition-transform duration-300 ease-in-out transform hover:scale-105 mx-2 card-min-height`}
onMouseEnter={() => setIsHovered(true)}
onMouseLeave={() => setIsHovered(false)}
>
<img className="w-64 h-48 object-cover object-center rounded-md mb-4" src={item.image} alt={item.name} />
<h3 className="text-xl font-semibold">{item.name}</h3>
<p className="text-gray-600">{item.description}</p>
{isHovered && (
<div className="mt-4">
<p className="text-lg font-bold text-red-700 line-through">{item.originalPrice}</p>
<p className="text-xl font-bold text-red-500">{item.offerPrice}</p>
</div>
)}
</div>
);
};
// Usage in TodaysSpecial component
<SpecialCard item={todaysSpecial.coffee} type="coffee" bgColor="bg-pink-100" />
<SpecialCard item={todaysSpecial.food} type="food" bgColor="bg-teal-100" />
<SpecialCard item={todaysSpecial.drink} type="drink" bgColor="bg-pink-100" />This refactoring will make the code more maintainable and easier to update in the future.
| const handleCloseInstructions = () => { | ||
| setSelectedBoard(null); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove duplicate handleCloseInstructions function
The handleCloseInstructions function is defined here and again later in the code (after line 192). Having duplicate definitions can lead to unexpected behavior or confusion.
Please remove one of the definitions to avoid duplication. Here's how you can remove this instance:
- const handleCloseInstructions = () => {
- setSelectedBoard(null);
- };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const handleCloseInstructions = () => { | |
| setSelectedBoard(null); | |
| }; |
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| window.scrollTo(0, 0); | ||
| }, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove duplicate useEffect for scrolling
The useEffect hook for scrolling to the top is defined here and may already exist earlier in the component. Multiple definitions can cause confusion.
Keep only one instance of the useEffect hook. You can remove this duplicate:
- useEffect(() => {
- window.scrollTo(0, 0);
- }, []);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| useEffect(() => { | |
| window.scrollTo(0, 0); | |
| }, []); |
To resolve the issue of incorrect scroll position when navigating between pages, I used React's useEffect hook to automatically scroll the window to the top whenever a new page loads, ensuring correct view positioning in all the components pages.
Now, it is working as desired.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
.cardCSS class for smooth transition effects and hover shadow.TodaysSpecialcomponent with pricing information and improved hover effects.Bug Fixes
TodaysSpecialcomponent.Documentation
useEffecthook where necessary.