Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added back to top button #151 #153

Merged

Conversation

Sawan-Kushwah
Copy link
Contributor

@Sawan-Kushwah Sawan-Kushwah commented Oct 8, 2024

Issue #151

BoardGame.Cafe.Mozilla.Firefox.2024-10-08.15-23-33.mp4

This PR will add a back to top button on all the pages for consistency and better user experience
i have uses best codding practice and added the button on all the pages by including in app.jsx
and also maintain the folder structure by adding this button on shared folder to mantain consistency

After adding animation

Untitled.video.-.Made.with.Clipchamp.10.mp4

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a "Back to Top" button that appears when users scroll down the page, allowing for easy navigation back to the top.
  • Style
    • Enhanced visual styling for the new button to improve user experience.
    • Updated background color for the app and made formatting adjustments in CSS.
  • Chores
    • Updated Tailwind CSS animations for improved visual effects.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 8, 2024

@Sawan-Kushwah is attempting to deploy a commit to the bunty's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new React component, BackToTopButton, which is integrated into the existing App component structure. This button allows users to scroll back to the top of the page when clicked and becomes visible after scrolling down 300 pixels. The component utilizes React hooks for managing visibility and scroll behavior, while the overall structure of the App remains unchanged. Additionally, updates were made to the Tailwind CSS configuration and styling in App.css.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
frontend/src/App.jsx Added BackToTopButton component within the App structure, positioned before Navbar, Outlet, and Footer. Indentation adjusted for consistency.
frontend/src/components/Shared/BackToTopButton.jsx Introduced a new functional component that manages visibility based on scroll position and provides a smooth scroll-to-top functionality. Includes cleanup for event listeners.
frontend/src/App.css Modified styles including background color and formatting adjustments. No public entity alterations.
frontend/tailwind.config.js Updated keyframes and animations, replacing fadeIn and slideIn with fadeInBounce and fadeOutBounce.

Possibly related PRs

  • Refactor routing and improve layout with Navbar and Footer #20: The changes in the App.jsx file regarding the layout and structure of the App component are related, as both PRs modify the same file and involve the arrangement of components within the application.
  • Kindeauth integrated using react #71: This PR also modifies the App.jsx file by adding the KindeProvider, which wraps the components including the BackToTopButton, indicating a direct relationship in terms of component hierarchy and structure.
  • enhancement:hamburger menu to toggle to 'X' on mobile #83: The modifications to the Navbar.jsx in this PR are relevant as they enhance the mobile navigation experience, which is likely to interact with the BackToTopButton functionality in the overall layout of the application.

Suggested labels

enhancement

Suggested reviewers

  • RamakrushnaBiswal

Poem

In the land of code where we hop and play,
A button appears to brighten the day.
"Back to the top!" it cheerfully calls,
As we scroll down the page, it gracefully sprawls.
With a click, we ascend, oh what a delight,
Thanks to our friend, the button so bright! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Thank you for submitting your pull request! 🙌 We'll review it as soon as possible. In the meantime, please ensure that your changes align with our CONTRIBUTING.md. If there are any specific instructions or feedback regarding your PR, we'll provide them here. Thanks again for your contribution! 😊

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3c988e6 and 2428822.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • frontend/src/App.jsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/components/Shared/BackToTopButton.jsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
frontend/src/App.jsx (4)

9-9: LGTM: BackToTopButton import added correctly.

The import statement for the BackToTopButton component is correctly placed and follows the appropriate syntax.


Line range hint 1-30: Overall, the changes look good. A few points to consider:

  1. The BackToTopButton has been successfully integrated into the App component.
  2. The KindeProvider is correctly structured with environment variables.
  3. The placement of the BackToTopButton seems logical.

To ensure everything works as expected:

  • Verify that all required environment variables are set correctly.
  • Check for any potential CSS conflicts or layout issues with the BackToTopButton.
  • Test the functionality of the BackToTopButton across different pages and screen sizes.

Great job on implementing this feature! It should improve the user experience by providing an easy way to navigate back to the top of the page.


20-20: BackToTopButton placement looks good. Verify impact on other components.

The BackToTopButton component is correctly placed as a child of KindeProvider, ensuring it's available across all pages.

Please verify that the BackToTopButton doesn't interfere with the layout or functionality of other components, especially the Navbar. You can check this by:

  1. Running the application and scrolling on different pages to ensure the button appears and functions correctly.
  2. Inspecting the CSS to confirm there are no conflicting styles.

Consider running the following command to check for any potential CSS conflicts:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential CSS conflicts with BackToTopButton

echo "Checking for potential CSS conflicts with BackToTopButton:"
rg -i --type css '(position:\s*(fixed|absolute))|(z-index)|(bottom)|(right)' src/

This will help identify any CSS rules that might affect the positioning of the BackToTopButton.


14-24: KindeProvider structure looks good. Verify environment variables.

The KindeProvider component is correctly structured with appropriate props. The use of environment variables for sensitive information is a good practice.

Please ensure that the following environment variables are correctly set in your .env file:

  • VITE_KINDE_CLIENT_ID
  • VITE_KINDE_DOMAIN
  • VITE_KINDE_REDIRECT_URI
  • VITE_KINDE_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URI

You can verify this by running the following script:

✅ Verification successful

KindeProvider structure is correctly implemented and environment variables are properly referenced.

The KindeProvider component is well-structured, and the necessary environment variables (VITE_KINDE_CLIENT_ID, VITE_KINDE_DOMAIN, VITE_KINDE_REDIRECT_URI, VITE_KINDE_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URI) are correctly referenced in frontend/src/App.jsx. Ensure that these variables are set through your deployment environment or CI/CD pipeline as the .env file is not present.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if required environment variables are set in .env file

env_file=".env"
required_vars=("VITE_KINDE_CLIENT_ID" "VITE_KINDE_DOMAIN" "VITE_KINDE_REDIRECT_URI" "VITE_KINDE_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URI")

if [ -f "$env_file" ]; then
  echo "Checking .env file for required variables:"
  for var in "${required_vars[@]}"; do
    if grep -q "^$var=" "$env_file"; then
      echo "$var is set"
    else
      echo "$var is missing"
    fi
  done
else
  echo "❌ .env file not found"
fi

Length of output: 416


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if required environment variables are set in .env file

env_file=".env"
required_vars=("VITE_KINDE_CLIENT_ID" "VITE_KINDE_DOMAIN" "VITE_KINDE_REDIRECT_URI" "VITE_KINDE_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URI")

if [ -f "$env_file" ]; then
  echo "Checking .env file for required variables:"
  for var in "${required_vars[@]}"; do
    if grep -q "^$var=" "$env_file"; then
      echo "$var is set"
    else
      echo "$var is missing"
    fi
  done
else
  echo "❌ .env file not found"
fi

Length of output: 206


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search the codebase for references to required environment variables

required_vars=("VITE_KINDE_CLIENT_ID" "VITE_KINDE_DOMAIN" "VITE_KINDE_REDIRECT_URI" "VITE_KINDE_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URI")

echo "Searching for references to required environment variables in the codebase:"
for var in "${required_vars[@]}"; do
  echo "🔍 Searching for $var"
  rg "$var" --type-add 'javascript=js,jsx,ts,tsx' --type javascript
done

Length of output: 1350


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search the codebase for references to required environment variables

required_vars=("VITE_KINDE_CLIENT_ID" "VITE_KINDE_DOMAIN" "VITE_KINDE_REDIRECT_URI" "VITE_KINDE_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URI")

echo "Searching for references to required environment variables in the codebase:"
for var in "${required_vars[@]}"; do
  echo "🔍 Searching for $var"
  rg "$var" --glob '*.js' --glob '*.jsx' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'
done

Length of output: 1446

frontend/src/components/Shared/BackToTopButton.jsx (1)

1-4: LGTM: Imports and component declaration are correct.

The necessary hooks are imported, and the component is properly declared as a functional component.

frontend/src/components/Shared/BackToTopButton.jsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +23 to +30
useEffect(() => {
window.addEventListener('scroll', toggleVisibility);

// Cleanup event listener on component unmount
return () => {
window.removeEventListener('scroll', toggleVisibility);
};
}, []);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using useCallback for the toggleVisibility function.

The useEffect hook correctly adds and removes the scroll event listener. However, to prevent unnecessary re-renders and ensure consistent behavior, consider wrapping toggleVisibility with useCallback.

Here's a suggested implementation:

const toggleVisibility = useCallback(() => {
  setIsVisible(window.scrollY > 300);
}, []);

useEffect(() => {
  window.addEventListener('scroll', toggleVisibility);
  return () => window.removeEventListener('scroll', toggleVisibility);
}, [toggleVisibility]);

This ensures that the function reference remains stable across re-renders, optimizing performance and preventing potential bugs.

Comment on lines 32 to 47
return (
<>
{isVisible && (
<button
onClick={scrollToTop}
className="z-50 fixed bottom-12 right-8 bg-green-700 hover:bg-green-600 transition-all text-white font-bold px-5 py-3 rounded-md shadow-lg hover:shadow-xl transition-opacity duration-300"
style={{ boxShadow: "0 4px 8px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2)" }}
>
</button>
)}
</>
);
};

export default BackToTopButton;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve button styling and accessibility.

The conditional rendering of the button is correct, but there are a few areas for improvement:

  1. Consider moving inline styles to a separate CSS file or Tailwind classes for better maintainability.
  2. Add an aria-label to the button for improved accessibility.
  3. Consider using a more semantic icon for the up arrow.

Here's a suggested implementation:

return (
  <>
    {isVisible && (
      <button
        onClick={scrollToTop}
        className="z-50 fixed bottom-12 right-8 bg-green-700 hover:bg-green-600 text-white font-bold px-5 py-3 rounded-md shadow-lg hover:shadow-xl transition-all duration-300"
        aria-label="Scroll to top"
      >
        <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" className="h-6 w-6" fill="none" viewBox="0 0 24 24" stroke="currentColor">
          <path strokeLinecap="round" strokeLinejoin="round" strokeWidth={2} d="M5 10l7-7m0 0l7 7m-7-7v18" />
        </svg>
      </button>
    )}
  </>
);

This implementation improves accessibility and uses a more semantic SVG icon for the up arrow.

@Shiva-Bajpai
Copy link
Collaborator

@Sawan-Kushwah can you make this more attractive via adding simple animation to it?

@Shiva-Bajpai Shiva-Bajpai added level2 for 25 points gssoc-ext gssoc-extd program labels Oct 8, 2024
@Sawan-Kushwah
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Shiva-Bajpai Sure i can

@Shiva-Bajpai
Copy link
Collaborator

Make the changes and send the PR

@Sawan-Kushwah
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sawan-Kushwah commented Oct 8, 2024

@Shiva-Bajpai Added animation you can see in video i have uploaded ! Any more improvement needed ? I will do it!😊

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 8, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
play-cafe ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 8, 2024 0:40am

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
frontend/tailwind.config.js (1)

24-25: Well-defined animations that complement the new keyframes.

The updated animations fadeInBounce and fadeOutBounce are correctly configured to use the new keyframes. The 0.5s duration with ease-out timing will provide a smooth and quick animation, enhancing the user experience.

Consider extracting the animation duration to a custom property for easier maintenance:

theme: {
  extend: {
+   --animation-duration: '0.5s',
    animation: {
-     fadeInBounce: 'fadeInBounce 0.5s ease-out forwards',
-     fadeOutBounce: 'fadeOutBounce 0.5s ease-out forwards',
+     fadeInBounce: 'fadeInBounce var(--animation-duration) ease-out forwards',
+     fadeOutBounce: 'fadeOutBounce var(--animation-duration) ease-out forwards',
    },
  },
},

This change would allow for easier adjustment of the animation duration across both animations in the future.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2428822 and 14a37e7.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • frontend/src/App.css (2 hunks)
  • frontend/src/components/Shared/BackToTopButton.jsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/tailwind.config.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
frontend/src/App.css

[error] 33-33: expected } but instead the file ends

the file ends here

(parse)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
frontend/tailwind.config.js (2)

14-21: Excellent implementation of bounce effect keyframes!

The new fadeInBounce and fadeOutBounce keyframes are well-implemented and align perfectly with the PR objective of making the "back to top" button more attractive. These keyframes will provide a smooth, visually appealing animation that enhances the user experience.


14-25: Summary: Excellent implementation of animated "back to top" button

The changes to the Tailwind configuration file successfully implement the requested animation for the "back to top" button. The new keyframes and updated animations will provide a visually appealing bounce effect, enhancing the user experience as intended.

These changes directly address the suggestion made by Shiva-Bajpai in the PR comments to make the button more attractive with a simple animation. Great job on implementing this feedback, Sawan-Kushwah!

frontend/src/components/Shared/BackToTopButton.jsx (3)

1-5: LGTM: Imports and component setup look good.

The imports are correct, and the component is well-structured with appropriate state variables for managing visibility and rendering.


25-40: LGTM: useEffect hooks are well-implemented.

The useEffect hooks for managing the scroll event listener and button removal are correctly implemented. The cleanup functions are properly in place, which is crucial for preventing memory leaks.

Note: If you implement the debounced toggleVisibility function as suggested earlier, remember to update the first useEffect hook accordingly.


1-58: Overall assessment: Good implementation with room for optimization.

The BackToTopButton component successfully implements the required functionality. It effectively manages visibility based on scroll position and provides a smooth scrolling experience. The use of React hooks for state management and side effects is appropriate.

To further enhance this component, consider implementing the suggested optimizations:

  1. Debounce the scroll event handler for better performance.
  2. Add a fallback for smooth scrolling in unsupported browsers.
  3. Improve button styling and accessibility as suggested.

These improvements will result in a more robust, performant, and accessible component.

@Shiva-Bajpai Shiva-Bajpai merged commit 4489f20 into RamakrushnaBiswal:main Oct 8, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@RamakrushnaBiswal RamakrushnaBiswal mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2024
3 tasks
@Shiva-Bajpai Shiva-Bajpai added hacktoberfest accepted hacktoberfest-accepted repo level1 for 10 points and removed level2 for 25 points labels Oct 8, 2024
@RamakrushnaBiswal RamakrushnaBiswal added level2 for 25 points hacktoberfest accepted hacktoberfest-accepted repo and removed hacktoberfest accepted hacktoberfest-accepted repo level1 for 10 points labels Oct 8, 2024
This was referenced Oct 13, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
gssoc-ext gssoc-extd program hacktoberfest accepted hacktoberfest-accepted repo level2 for 25 points
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants