-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added back to top button #151 #153
Added back to top button #151 #153
Conversation
@Sawan-Kushwah is attempting to deploy a commit to the bunty's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new React component, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Thank you for submitting your pull request! 🙌 We'll review it as soon as possible. In the meantime, please ensure that your changes align with our CONTRIBUTING.md. If there are any specific instructions or feedback regarding your PR, we'll provide them here. Thanks again for your contribution! 😊 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- frontend/src/App.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Shared/BackToTopButton.jsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
frontend/src/App.jsx (4)
9-9
: LGTM: BackToTopButton import added correctly.The import statement for the BackToTopButton component is correctly placed and follows the appropriate syntax.
Line range hint
1-30
: Overall, the changes look good. A few points to consider:
- The BackToTopButton has been successfully integrated into the App component.
- The KindeProvider is correctly structured with environment variables.
- The placement of the BackToTopButton seems logical.
To ensure everything works as expected:
- Verify that all required environment variables are set correctly.
- Check for any potential CSS conflicts or layout issues with the BackToTopButton.
- Test the functionality of the BackToTopButton across different pages and screen sizes.
Great job on implementing this feature! It should improve the user experience by providing an easy way to navigate back to the top of the page.
20-20
: BackToTopButton placement looks good. Verify impact on other components.The BackToTopButton component is correctly placed as a child of KindeProvider, ensuring it's available across all pages.
Please verify that the BackToTopButton doesn't interfere with the layout or functionality of other components, especially the Navbar. You can check this by:
- Running the application and scrolling on different pages to ensure the button appears and functions correctly.
- Inspecting the CSS to confirm there are no conflicting styles.
Consider running the following command to check for any potential CSS conflicts:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential CSS conflicts with BackToTopButton echo "Checking for potential CSS conflicts with BackToTopButton:" rg -i --type css '(position:\s*(fixed|absolute))|(z-index)|(bottom)|(right)' src/This will help identify any CSS rules that might affect the positioning of the BackToTopButton.
14-24
: KindeProvider structure looks good. Verify environment variables.The KindeProvider component is correctly structured with appropriate props. The use of environment variables for sensitive information is a good practice.
Please ensure that the following environment variables are correctly set in your
.env
file:
- VITE_KINDE_CLIENT_ID
- VITE_KINDE_DOMAIN
- VITE_KINDE_REDIRECT_URI
- VITE_KINDE_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URI
You can verify this by running the following script:
✅ Verification successful
KindeProvider structure is correctly implemented and environment variables are properly referenced.
The
KindeProvider
component is well-structured, and the necessary environment variables (VITE_KINDE_CLIENT_ID
,VITE_KINDE_DOMAIN
,VITE_KINDE_REDIRECT_URI
,VITE_KINDE_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URI
) are correctly referenced infrontend/src/App.jsx
. Ensure that these variables are set through your deployment environment or CI/CD pipeline as the.env
file is not present.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if required environment variables are set in .env file env_file=".env" required_vars=("VITE_KINDE_CLIENT_ID" "VITE_KINDE_DOMAIN" "VITE_KINDE_REDIRECT_URI" "VITE_KINDE_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URI") if [ -f "$env_file" ]; then echo "Checking .env file for required variables:" for var in "${required_vars[@]}"; do if grep -q "^$var=" "$env_file"; then echo "✅ $var is set" else echo "❌ $var is missing" fi done else echo "❌ .env file not found" fiLength of output: 416
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if required environment variables are set in .env file env_file=".env" required_vars=("VITE_KINDE_CLIENT_ID" "VITE_KINDE_DOMAIN" "VITE_KINDE_REDIRECT_URI" "VITE_KINDE_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URI") if [ -f "$env_file" ]; then echo "Checking .env file for required variables:" for var in "${required_vars[@]}"; do if grep -q "^$var=" "$env_file"; then echo "✅ $var is set" else echo "❌ $var is missing" fi done else echo "❌ .env file not found" fiLength of output: 206
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search the codebase for references to required environment variables required_vars=("VITE_KINDE_CLIENT_ID" "VITE_KINDE_DOMAIN" "VITE_KINDE_REDIRECT_URI" "VITE_KINDE_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URI") echo "Searching for references to required environment variables in the codebase:" for var in "${required_vars[@]}"; do echo "🔍 Searching for $var" rg "$var" --type-add 'javascript=js,jsx,ts,tsx' --type javascript doneLength of output: 1350
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search the codebase for references to required environment variables required_vars=("VITE_KINDE_CLIENT_ID" "VITE_KINDE_DOMAIN" "VITE_KINDE_REDIRECT_URI" "VITE_KINDE_LOGOUT_REDIRECT_URI") echo "Searching for references to required environment variables in the codebase:" for var in "${required_vars[@]}"; do echo "🔍 Searching for $var" rg "$var" --glob '*.js' --glob '*.jsx' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' doneLength of output: 1446
frontend/src/components/Shared/BackToTopButton.jsx (1)
1-4
: LGTM: Imports and component declaration are correct.The necessary hooks are imported, and the component is properly declared as a functional component.
useEffect(() => { | ||
window.addEventListener('scroll', toggleVisibility); | ||
|
||
// Cleanup event listener on component unmount | ||
return () => { | ||
window.removeEventListener('scroll', toggleVisibility); | ||
}; | ||
}, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using useCallback for the toggleVisibility function.
The useEffect
hook correctly adds and removes the scroll event listener. However, to prevent unnecessary re-renders and ensure consistent behavior, consider wrapping toggleVisibility
with useCallback
.
Here's a suggested implementation:
const toggleVisibility = useCallback(() => {
setIsVisible(window.scrollY > 300);
}, []);
useEffect(() => {
window.addEventListener('scroll', toggleVisibility);
return () => window.removeEventListener('scroll', toggleVisibility);
}, [toggleVisibility]);
This ensures that the function reference remains stable across re-renders, optimizing performance and preventing potential bugs.
return ( | ||
<> | ||
{isVisible && ( | ||
<button | ||
onClick={scrollToTop} | ||
className="z-50 fixed bottom-12 right-8 bg-green-700 hover:bg-green-600 transition-all text-white font-bold px-5 py-3 rounded-md shadow-lg hover:shadow-xl transition-opacity duration-300" | ||
style={{ boxShadow: "0 4px 8px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2)" }} | ||
> | ||
↑ | ||
</button> | ||
)} | ||
</> | ||
); | ||
}; | ||
|
||
export default BackToTopButton; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve button styling and accessibility.
The conditional rendering of the button is correct, but there are a few areas for improvement:
- Consider moving inline styles to a separate CSS file or Tailwind classes for better maintainability.
- Add an aria-label to the button for improved accessibility.
- Consider using a more semantic icon for the up arrow.
Here's a suggested implementation:
return (
<>
{isVisible && (
<button
onClick={scrollToTop}
className="z-50 fixed bottom-12 right-8 bg-green-700 hover:bg-green-600 text-white font-bold px-5 py-3 rounded-md shadow-lg hover:shadow-xl transition-all duration-300"
aria-label="Scroll to top"
>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" className="h-6 w-6" fill="none" viewBox="0 0 24 24" stroke="currentColor">
<path strokeLinecap="round" strokeLinejoin="round" strokeWidth={2} d="M5 10l7-7m0 0l7 7m-7-7v18" />
</svg>
</button>
)}
</>
);
This implementation improves accessibility and uses a more semantic SVG icon for the up arrow.
@Sawan-Kushwah can you make this more attractive via adding simple animation to it? |
@Shiva-Bajpai Sure i can |
Make the changes and send the PR |
@Shiva-Bajpai Added animation you can see in video i have uploaded ! Any more improvement needed ? I will do it!😊 |
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
frontend/tailwind.config.js (1)
24-25
: Well-defined animations that complement the new keyframes.The updated animations
fadeInBounce
andfadeOutBounce
are correctly configured to use the new keyframes. The 0.5s duration with ease-out timing will provide a smooth and quick animation, enhancing the user experience.Consider extracting the animation duration to a custom property for easier maintenance:
theme: { extend: { + --animation-duration: '0.5s', animation: { - fadeInBounce: 'fadeInBounce 0.5s ease-out forwards', - fadeOutBounce: 'fadeOutBounce 0.5s ease-out forwards', + fadeInBounce: 'fadeInBounce var(--animation-duration) ease-out forwards', + fadeOutBounce: 'fadeOutBounce var(--animation-duration) ease-out forwards', }, }, },This change would allow for easier adjustment of the animation duration across both animations in the future.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- frontend/src/App.css (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/Shared/BackToTopButton.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/tailwind.config.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
frontend/src/App.css
[error] 33-33: expected
}
but instead the file endsthe file ends here
(parse)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
frontend/tailwind.config.js (2)
14-21
: Excellent implementation of bounce effect keyframes!The new
fadeInBounce
andfadeOutBounce
keyframes are well-implemented and align perfectly with the PR objective of making the "back to top" button more attractive. These keyframes will provide a smooth, visually appealing animation that enhances the user experience.
14-25
: Summary: Excellent implementation of animated "back to top" buttonThe changes to the Tailwind configuration file successfully implement the requested animation for the "back to top" button. The new keyframes and updated animations will provide a visually appealing bounce effect, enhancing the user experience as intended.
These changes directly address the suggestion made by Shiva-Bajpai in the PR comments to make the button more attractive with a simple animation. Great job on implementing this feedback, Sawan-Kushwah!
frontend/src/components/Shared/BackToTopButton.jsx (3)
1-5
: LGTM: Imports and component setup look good.The imports are correct, and the component is well-structured with appropriate state variables for managing visibility and rendering.
25-40
: LGTM: useEffect hooks are well-implemented.The useEffect hooks for managing the scroll event listener and button removal are correctly implemented. The cleanup functions are properly in place, which is crucial for preventing memory leaks.
Note: If you implement the debounced toggleVisibility function as suggested earlier, remember to update the first useEffect hook accordingly.
1-58
: Overall assessment: Good implementation with room for optimization.The BackToTopButton component successfully implements the required functionality. It effectively manages visibility based on scroll position and provides a smooth scrolling experience. The use of React hooks for state management and side effects is appropriate.
To further enhance this component, consider implementing the suggested optimizations:
- Debounce the scroll event handler for better performance.
- Add a fallback for smooth scrolling in unsupported browsers.
- Improve button styling and accessibility as suggested.
These improvements will result in a more robust, performant, and accessible component.
Issue #151
BoardGame.Cafe.Mozilla.Firefox.2024-10-08.15-23-33.mp4
This PR will add a back to top button on all the pages for consistency and better user experience
i have uses best codding practice and added the button on all the pages by including in app.jsx
and also maintain the folder structure by adding this button on shared folder to mantain consistency
After adding animation
Untitled.video.-.Made.with.Clipchamp.10.mp4
Summary by CodeRabbit