Removing a field from troubleshooting template #140
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sjspielman
reviewed
Mar 11, 2024
| @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ | |||
| name: "Troubleshooting" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah okay! I'm assuming it should be exactly as it's shown there? title: "[Troubleshooting] "
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So looking further into the docs, it appears that body is definitely required but title is optional. So I think we can merge with or without a title!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I could not really say about the [], but I'm ok doing it without a title and seeing how that comes out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okay. Just re-requested you. We shall see!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
Still receiving an error on the troubleshooting template.
I looked at a
textareadiscussion template from another organization and it looks like this. Perhaps just thebodyfield was missing...Issue Addressed
Addresses #129
Any comments, concerns, or questions important for reviewers
🤞🏻