Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor and Improve textgrad Modules for Better Readability and Maintainability #22

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sanowl
Copy link
Contributor

@sanowl sanowl commented Jun 20, 2024

Description

This pull request refactors and improves the textgrad modules to enhance readability and maintainability. The following changes have been made:

  • Organized imports and grouped them logically for better readability.
  • Added detailed docstrings to classes and methods for better documentation and understanding.
  • Streamlined initialization checks for engines and system prompts in the constructors.
  • Improved readability and consistency in string formatting.
  • Added comments to explain the purpose of each class and method.

Changes

  1. Grouped and ordered imports logically.
  2. Added detailed docstrings to classes and methods.
  3. Streamlined initialization checks for engines and system prompts.
  4. Improved readability and consistency in string formatting.
  5. Added comments for better understanding of the code.

Testing

All existing functionality has been retained and tested. No new tests were added, but the improvements ensure better maintainability and readability of the codebase.

Additional Notes

This refactoring does not introduce any new functionality. It is aimed at improving the code quality and maintainability.

…tainability

- Organized imports and grouped them logically.
- Added detailed docstrings to classes and methods for better documentation.
- Streamlined initialization checks for engines and system prompts.
- Improved readability and consistency in string formatting.
- Added comments for better understanding of the code.
@mertyg mertyg self-requested a review June 20, 2024 13:48
@nihalnayak
Copy link
Contributor

@mertyg any update on this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants