test: investigate v2 migration test failure

[lumtis]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Enhanced token upgrade functionality to support Solana ZRC20 tokens alongside existing BTC ZRC20 tokens.
  • Added logging for the Solana ZRC20 upgrade process to improve traceability.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces an enhancement to the upgradeZRC20s method in the E2ERunner struct, enabling the upgrade of Solana ZRC20 tokens alongside the existing functionality for BTC ZRC20 tokens. The method now includes logging for the initiation of the Solana upgrade and invokes the upgradeZRC20 function with the necessary parameters for Solana tokens. This modification expands the capability of the E2ERunner to manage upgrades for multiple blockchain tokens.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
e2e/runner/v2_migration.go	Enhanced upgradeZRC20s method to support upgrading Solana ZRC20 tokens; added logging for initiation.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant E2ERunner
    participant UpgradeService

    User->>E2ERunner: Initiate ZRC20 Upgrade
    E2ERunner->>UpgradeService: Log Solana ZRC20 Upgrade Start
    E2ERunner->>UpgradeService: upgradeZRC20(Solana Token)
    UpgradeService-->>E2ERunner: Upgrade Successful
    E2ERunner-->>User: Upgrade Completed

Loading

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.80%. Comparing base (33b0e71) to head (89b2204).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2864      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    66.81%   66.80%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          371      373       +2     
  Lines        20910    20993      +83     
===========================================
+ Hits         13972    14025      +53     
- Misses        6300     6315      +15     
- Partials       638      653      +15     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

e2e/runner/v2_migration.go (1)

77-80: LGTM, but consider extracting hardcoded values into constants or configuration variables.

The code changes for upgrading the Solana ZRC20 token are approved.

However, consider the following suggestions to improve maintainability and flexibility:

• Extract the hardcoded chain ID 902 into a constant or configuration variable. This will make it easier to update the chain ID if it changes in the future.
• Extract the hardcoded coin type coin.CoinType_Gas into a constant or configuration variable. This will make it easier to update the coin type if a different coin type is used for Solana in the future.

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 23ecfde and 89b2204.

Files selected for processing (1)

• e2e/runner/v2_migration.go (1 hunks)

Additional context used

Path-based instructions (1)

e2e/runner/v2_migration.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.