-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: Update sast-linters.yml #2377
Conversation
- Exclude .github/workflows/sast-linters.yml from gosec nosec use scanning
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters Files ignored due to path filters (2)
You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
!!!WARNING!!! Be very careful about using Only suppress a single rule (or a specific set of rules) within a section of code, while continuing to scan for other problems. To do this, you can list the rule(s) to be suppressed within the #nosec annotation, e.g: /* #nosec G401 */ or //#nosec G201 G202 G203 Pay extra attention to the way |
Also ignore changelog.md
Description
This PR is designed to prevent the nosec use scanning workflow from triggering on its own file. It also will only trigger on the addition of
nosec
rather than the removal of it.This PR changes only the bare minimum needed to resolve the the issues, and could instead be expanded to exempt well known out of scope file extensions.
Changes:
Closes: #1489
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Include instructions and any relevant details so others can reproduce.
Checklist: