Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

requests: implement a new community manage record request #496

Conversation

anikachurilova
Copy link
Contributor

@anikachurilova anikachurilova commented Sep 12, 2023

Request details page:
Screenshot 2023-09-12 at 16 17 37

Accepted:
Screenshot 2023-09-12 at 16 18 39

Declined:
Screenshot 2023-09-12 at 16 19 10

Expired:
Screenshot 2023-09-12 at 17 01 50

@anikachurilova anikachurilova force-pushed the create-a-new-request-type-for-record-manage branch from 1d28b94 to 4e1e6c7 Compare September 13, 2023 08:24
@anikachurilova anikachurilova marked this pull request as ready for review September 13, 2023 08:29
Copy link
Member

@slint slint left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Just calrifications, no changes needed.

site/zenodo_rdm/legacy/requests/community_manage_record.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
site/zenodo_rdm/legacy/requests/community_manage_record.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
site/zenodo_rdm/legacy/requests/utils.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@anikachurilova anikachurilova force-pushed the create-a-new-request-type-for-record-manage branch from c5abca9 to c06902b Compare September 14, 2023 12:24
@anikachurilova anikachurilova force-pushed the create-a-new-request-type-for-record-manage branch from 6e5226d to 369a480 Compare September 14, 2023 12:46
@zzacharo zzacharo merged commit e8807ad into zenodo:master Sep 14, 2023
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants