Updating example 2 in prog determined #3049
Conversation
| @@ -6,8 +6,7 @@ | |||
| <a>user agents</a>, including <a>assistive technologies</a>, can extract and present this information to users in different modalities | |||
| </p> | |||
|
|
|||
| <aside class="example"><p>Determined in a markup language from elements and attributes that are accessed directly | |||
| by commonly available assistive technology. | |||
| <aside class="example"><p>Determined in a markup language from elements and attributes that are exposed in the accessibility tree. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| <aside class="example"><p>Determined in a markup language from elements and attributes that are exposed in the accessibility tree. | |
| <aside class="example"><p>Determined in a markup language from elements and attributes that are accessed via the accessibility tree by commonly available assistive technology. |
As I mentioned in a comment today, I'd prefer to keep "commonly available assistive technology" in both examples, consistent with 5.2.4 and "accessibility supported."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i'd keep the aspect of whether something is in the accessibility tree, and whether or not AT then accesses/uses it for anything, separate
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I prefer 'exposed', as it is rather about clean html instead of depending on abilities of existing technologies.
|
Note that we did discuss this previously and had resolved to change the understanding document instead. We can revisit, particularly with a new version, but we should look at updating the understanding doc. An updated version shouldn't include term "accessibility tree". |
Closes #3001