Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[V1] Use more persistent buffers to optimize input preparation overheads #11111

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

WoosukKwon
Copy link
Collaborator

@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon commented Dec 11, 2024

This PR simplifies the input preparation code further while optimizing it by utilizing more persistent buffers. Creating new tensors can introduce considerable overhead for small-batch inputs, so persistent buffers effectively reduce latency.

Signed-off-by: Woosuk Kwon <[email protected]>
Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.
Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can do one of these:

  • Add ready label to the PR
  • Enable auto-merge.

🚀

Signed-off-by: Woosuk Kwon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Woosuk Kwon <[email protected]>
@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2024 19:15
@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Dec 11, 2024
@alexm-neuralmagic
Copy link
Collaborator

Nice idea!

dtype=torch.int32,
device="cpu",
pin_memory=self.pin_memory)
self.slot_mapping_np = self.slot_mapping_cpu.numpy()
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does the resulting numpy here shares the memory buffer of the source tensor?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The returned ndarray and the tensor will share their storage, so changes to the tensor will be reflected in the ndarray and vice versa.

Yes. That's the trick here :)

@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon merged commit f092153 into main Dec 12, 2024
65 checks passed
@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon deleted the v1-opt-prep branch December 12, 2024 07:14
Akshat-Tripathi pushed a commit to krai/vllm that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
sleepwalker2017 pushed a commit to sleepwalker2017/vllm that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
BKitor pushed a commit to BKitor/vllm that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants