Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Security] Bump activesupport from 5.2.3 to 5.2.6 #160

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot-preview[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Bumps activesupport from 5.2.3 to 5.2.6. This update includes a security fix.

Vulnerabilities fixed

Sourced from The Ruby Advisory Database.

Potentially unintended unmarshalling of user-provided objects in MemCacheStore and RedisCacheStore There is potentially unexpected behaviour in the MemCacheStore and RedisCacheStore where, when untrusted user input is written to the cache store using the raw: true parameter, re-reading the result from the cache can evaluate the user input as a Marshalled object instead of plain text. Vulnerable code looks like:

data = cache.fetch("demo", raw: true) { untrusted_string }

Versions Affected: rails < 5.2.5, rails < 6.0.4 Not affected: Applications not using MemCacheStore or RedisCacheStore. Applications that do not use the raw option when storing untrusted user input. Fixed Versions: rails >= 5.2.4.3, rails >= 6.0.3.1

Impact

Unmarshalling of untrusted user input can have impact up to and including RCE. At a minimum, this vulnerability allows an attacker to inject untrusted Ruby objects into a web application.

In addition to upgrading to the latest versions of Rails, developers should ensure that whenever they are calling Rails.cache.fetch they are using consistent values of the raw parameter for both

... (truncated)

Patched versions: ~> 5.2.4, >= 5.2.4.3; >= 6.0.3.1 Unaffected versions: none

Release notes

Sourced from activesupport's releases.

5.2.6

Active Support

  • No changes.

Active Model

  • No changes.

Active Record

  • No changes.

Action View

  • No changes.

Action Pack

  • Accept base64_urlsafe CSRF tokens to make forward compatible.

    Base64 strict-encoded CSRF tokens are not inherently websafe, which makes them difficult to deal with. For example, the common practice of sending the CSRF token to a browser in a client-readable cookie does not work properly out of the box: the value has to be url-encoded and decoded to survive transport.

    In this version, we generate Base64 urlsafe-encoded CSRF tokens, which are inherently safe to transport. Validation accepts both urlsafe tokens, and strict-encoded tokens for backwards compatibility.

    How the tokes are encoded is controllr by the action_controller.urlsafe_csrf_tokens config.

    In Rails 5.2.5, the CSRF token format was accidentally changed to urlsafe-encoded.

    Atention: If you already upgraded your application to 5.2.5, set the config urlsafe_csrf_tokens to true, otherwise your form submission will start to fail during the deploy of this new version.

    Rails.application.config.action_controller.urlsafe_csrf_tokens = true

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot use these labels will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these reviewers will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these assignees will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use this milestone will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot badge me will comment on this PR with code to add a "Dependabot enabled" badge to your readme

Additionally, you can set the following in your Dependabot dashboard:

  • Update frequency (including time of day and day of week)
  • Pull request limits (per update run and/or open at any time)
  • Automerge options (never/patch/minor, and dev/runtime dependencies)
  • Out-of-range updates (receive only lockfile updates, if desired)
  • Security updates (receive only security updates, if desired)

Bumps [activesupport](https://github.com/rails/rails) from 5.2.3 to 5.2.6. **This update includes a security fix.**
- [Release notes](https://github.com/rails/rails/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/v6.1.3.2/activesupport/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](rails/rails@v5.2.3...v5.2.6)

Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot-preview dependabot-preview bot added dependencies security Pull requests that address a security vulnerability labels May 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies security Pull requests that address a security vulnerability
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants