Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: FIX #42: start table index/columns from 0 (python-like) #65

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2017

Conversation

ankostis
Copy link
Contributor

@ankostis ankostis commented May 3, 2017

It does not offer the possibility to configure it as a preference.

@uvemas
Copy link
Owner

uvemas commented May 6, 2017

Not sure about this feature. Most of users seem to be happy with one based rows.

@ankostis ankostis changed the title FIX #42: start table index/columns from 0 (python-like) WIP: FIX #42: start table index/columns from 0 (python-like) May 6, 2017
@ankostis
Copy link
Contributor Author

ankostis commented May 6, 2017

OK, should make it preferences configurable, because for pythoners (and some others[1]), it really does make sense to start counting from zero.

[1] http://stackoverflow.com/a/13519429/548792

@uvemas
Copy link
Owner

uvemas commented May 6, 2017

OK. You've convinced me with that nice SO thread.

@uvemas uvemas merged commit d6e1750 into uvemas:master May 6, 2017
@ankostis
Copy link
Contributor Author

ankostis commented May 6, 2017

Well, I didn't find that convincing SO's explanation.
What really had persuaded me for this matter was Dykstra's hand-written paper (the 1st link above). I enjoyed particularly following his robust thread of thinking :-)

@uvemas
Copy link
Owner

uvemas commented May 6, 2017

Sorry, I missed that. A great paper indeed. Thanks for let me know about it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants