2024-the-battle-for-your-data

[tri2820]

No description provided.

[carinaschrenk]

Internal Feedback Round 3B from Google Poll 05.12-08.12

Thoughts

• Interesting Article
• Too much text
• Too technical/Not appropriate for a general audience x2
• I don't think its necessary to mention concrete technologies in the last paragraph (x2)
• No clear line - it is not clear what the purpose of the article is.

A general comment:

Just because something is listed in the feedback, does not mean you have to implement it.
This list is simply a collection of everything commented in the google poll.
I tried to structure the comments and merge similar ones and count how often this point was mentioned.
If a comment says "I think", this is not me (Carina), but someone who commented on the poll.

[ShamanOxy]

External feedback:

(Total of 11 participants)

Part of participants that are computer science students/graduates: 60%

Part of participants that would read the booklet if it was not for this survey: 81 %

Clarity of the article:
Very clear: 72.72 %
Clear: 9.09 %
Not clear: 18.18 %

Technical vs. Non-technical:
Good balance between technical depth and readability: 72.72%
The article was too technical: 27.27 %

Engagement:
I stayed engaged throughout: 63.63 %
I lost interest midway: 36.36 %

Structure of the article:
The structure is clear and easy to follow: 81.81 %
The structure was confusing: 18.18 %

Part of participants that understand the purpose of the article: 72.72 %

Part of participants that think the drawing helps to understand the meaning of the article: 54.54 %

Factual errors/inaccuracies or additional comments:

NO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS