Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2024-two-factor-authentication #168

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

2024-two-factor-authentication #168

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

salman-manaa
Copy link
Collaborator

Added Two-Factor Authentication Article and Illustration

@salman-manaa salman-manaa added the 2024: round 3 articles of round 3 label Dec 3, 2024
@carinaschrenk carinaschrenk changed the title 2024 2fa 2024-two-factor-authentication Dec 3, 2024
@carinaschrenk
Copy link
Collaborator

Internal Feedback Round 3B from Google Poll 05.12-08.12

Thoughts

  • The text is good, simple and understandable x2
  • Nice/I like it x2
  • The second paragraph is somehow repeating what is already said
  • Topic might not be adequate for the booklet
  • The image could be better
    • for example there can be shown steps required for two-factor authentification

Ideas

  • Consider adding a simple flow diagram showing how 2FA works step-by-step for clearer understanding.

A general comment:

Just because something is listed in the feedback, does not mean you have to implement it.
This list is simply a collection of everything commented in the google poll.
I tried to structure the comments and merge similar ones and count how often this point was mentioned.
If a comment says "I think", this is not me (Carina), but someone who commented on the poll.

@ShamanOxy
Copy link
Collaborator

External feedback:

(Total of 11 participants)

Part of participants that are computer science students/graduates: 60%

Part of participants that would read the booklet if it was not for this survey: 81 %

Clarity of the article:
Very clear: 63 %
Clear: 37 %
Not clear: 0 %

Technical vs. Non-technical:
Good balance between technical depth and readability: 90.9%
The article was too technical: 9.1 %

Engagement:
I stayed engaged throughout: 90.9 %
I lost interest midway: 9.1 %

Structure of the article:
The structure is clear and easy to follow: 100 %
The structure was confusing: 0 %

Part of participants that understand the purpose of the article: 100 %

Part of participants that think the drawing helps to understand the meaning of the article: 54.54 %

Factual errors/inaccuracies or additional comments:

NO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

@AndreVRibeiro
Copy link
Collaborator

2FA: Your Digital Doorman (Creative feedback - André Ribeiro)

Think of your password as the guest list for a VIP club. But hackers? They’re the party crashers. Enter Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) - your sharp-eyed doorman who checks IDs twice. Even if someone steals your password, 2FA asks for extra proof, like a texted code or a fingerprint. No proof? No entry. Hackers can loiter all they want, but they’re not getting in.

It’s simple, quick, and keeps your accounts VIP-only.

Staying safe with Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) (Creative feedback - Miroslava Macejkova)

My house has two locks: the first is a regular door lock (password), and the second is a digital lock requiring a special code (2FA). Even if someone picks the first lock, they can’t enter without the second code. That’s exactly how Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) works—it acts as the second lock, ensuring only authorized access. Quick to set up and simple to use, 2FA adds a crucial layer of security, keeping my house safe from intruders.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2024: round 3 articles of round 3
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants