feat: update untp config command

[ldhyen99]

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

• 🍕 Feature
• 🐛 Bug Fix
• 📝 Documentation Update
• 🎨 Style
• 🧑‍💻 Code Refactor
• 🔥 Performance Improvements
• ✅ Test
• 🤖 Build
• 🔁 CI
• 📦 Chore (Release)
• ⏩ Revert

Description

Update the untp config command to generate a configuration file that only includes options related to the current UNTP data models.

To test, please copy this json data below to credentials.json in packages/untp-test-suite/credentials.json

{
  "credentials": [
    {
      "type": "digitalConformityCredential",
      "version": "v0.5.0",
      "dataPath": "credentials/conformityCredential/DigitalConformityCredential_instance-v0.5.0.json",
      "url": ""
    },
    {
      "type": "digitalFacilityRecord",
      "version": "v0.5.0",
      "dataPath": "credentials/digitalFacilityRecord/DigitalFacilityRecord_instance-v0.5.0.json",
      "url": ""
    },
    {
      "type": "digitalProductPassport",
      "version": "v0.5.0",
      "dataPath": "credentials/productPassport/DigitalProductPassport_instance-v0.5.0.json",
      "url": ""
    },
    {
      "type": "digitalTraceabilityEvent",
      "version": "v0.5.0",
      "dataPath": "credentials/traceabilityEvents/DigitalTraceabilityEvent_instance-v0.5.0.json",
      "url": ""
    }
  ]
}

Related Tickets & Documents

Mobile & Desktop Screenshots/Recordings

Added tests?

• 👍 yes
• 🙅 no, because they aren't needed
• 🙋 no, because I need help

Added to documentation?

• 📜 README.md
• 📕 storybook
• 🙅 no documentation needed

[optional] Are there any post-deployment tasks we need to perform?

[github-actions]

Coverage report

St.❔	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🟢	Statements	100%	0/0
🟢	Branches	100%	0/0
🟢	Functions	100%	0/0
🟢	Lines	100%	0/0

Test suite run success

0 tests passing in 0 suite.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 9fd09d6

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Report

Lines	Statements	Branches	Functions
	77.57% (2726/3514)	61.88% (518/837)	74.21% (308/415)

Title	Lines	Statements	Branches	Functions
All packages		77.57% (2726/3514)	61.88% (518/837)	74.21% (308/415)
Components		84.85% (510/601)	73.75% (118/160)	77.04% (94/122)
Mock app		69.59% (357/513)	49.26% (67/136)	67.85% (76/112)
Services		70.64% (881/1247)	52.6% (202/384)	75.19% (97/129)
UNTP test suite		57.34% (992/1730)	80.86% (131/162)	71.92% (41/57)
VC test suite		7.69% (12/156)		7.4% (2/27)

[ashleythedeveloper]

@ldhyen99, Should the name all start with digital to align with the naming convention?

[ldhyen99]

@ldhyen99, Should the name all start with digital to align with the naming convention?

Yes, It sounds good. Let me rename it.

[ashleythedeveloper]

@ldhyen99, I believe that conflicts need to be resolved in this branch due to the merge order. Could you take a look?

[ashleythedeveloper]

Thanks for adding the prefix.