Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add github workflow to automate adding issues to project #675

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2024

Conversation

sarah-tuva
Copy link
Member

@sarah-tuva sarah-tuva commented Nov 22, 2024

Describe your changes

Please include a summary of any changes.

Adding a new github worklow to automate adding opened/reopened issues to the Tuva Project Backlog project.

How has this been tested?

Please describe the tests you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions or code to reproduce output.

Unable to test this specific workflow locally.

Reviewer focus

Please summarize the specific items you’d like the reviewer(s) to look into.

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have added at least one Github label to this PR (bug, enhancement, breaking change,...)
  • My code follows style guidelines
  • (New models) YAML files are categorized by sub folder and models listed in alphabetical order
  • (New models) I have added a config to each new model to enable it for claims and/or clinical data
  • (New models) I have added the variable tuva_last_run to the final output
  • (Optional) I have recorded a Loom to explain this PR

Package release checklist

  • I have updated dbt docs
  • I have updated the version number in the dbt_project.yml

(Optional) Gif of how this PR makes you feel

Loom link

@tuvaforrest tuvaforrest merged commit f127b9f into main Nov 23, 2024
8 checks passed
@tuvaforrest tuvaforrest deleted the add-issue-automation branch November 23, 2024 00:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants