Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat:Add new endpoints and modify existing schemas in Ultravox API #13

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Dec 12, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added new endpoints for managing API keys, calls, tools, voices, and webhooks.
  • Improvements
    • Enhanced schemas for StartCallRequest, CallTool, and BaseToolDefinition with additional fields.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes to the Ultravox API involve the addition of multiple new endpoints for managing API keys, calls, tools, voices, and webhooks. Additionally, there are modifications to existing schemas, specifically the StartCallRequest, CallTool, and BaseToolDefinition, which now include new fields to enhance functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/libs/Ultravox/openapi.yaml Added new endpoints for managing API keys, calls, tools, voices, and webhooks. Modified StartCallRequest, CallTool, and BaseToolDefinition schemas to include new fields.

Poem

🐇 In the meadow, changes bloom,
New endpoints rise, dispelling gloom.
API keys and calls take flight,
Tools and voices shine so bright.
With every update, we rejoice,
In Ultravox, we find our voice! 🎶


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 180873f into main Dec 12, 2024
3 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Add new endpoints and modify existing schemas in Ultravox API Dec 12, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/libs/Ultravox/openapi.yaml (2)

1560-1563: Consider refining the timeout pattern for BaseToolDefinition.

The timeout field implementation is well documented with clear execution implications. However, the regex pattern allows negative durations which doesn't make sense for a timeout value.

Consider updating the pattern to disallow negative values:

-          pattern: '^-?(?:0|[1-9][0-9]{0,11})(?:\.[0-9]{1,9})?s$'
+          pattern: '^(?:0|[1-9][0-9]{0,11})(?:\.[0-9]{1,9})?s$'

Line range hint 1-8: Consider adding rate limiting information to the API specification.

While the API security and structure are well-defined, the specification would benefit from documenting rate limiting behavior. This helps API consumers better understand usage limits and implement appropriate handling.

Consider adding standard rate limiting response headers to the specification:

components:
  headers:
    X-RateLimit-Limit:
      schema:
        type: integer
      description: The number of allowed requests in the current period
    X-RateLimit-Remaining:
      schema:
        type: integer
      description: The number of remaining requests in the current period
    X-RateLimit-Reset:
      schema:
        type: integer
        format: unix-timestamp
      description: The time at which the current rate limit window resets

paths:
  # Add to all authenticated endpoints
  responses:
    '429':
      description: Too Many Requests
      headers:
        X-RateLimit-Limit:
          $ref: '#/components/headers/X-RateLimit-Limit'
        X-RateLimit-Remaining:
          $ref: '#/components/headers/X-RateLimit-Remaining'
        X-RateLimit-Reset:
          $ref: '#/components/headers/X-RateLimit-Reset'
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ca9f4ca and 32fd382.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • src/libs/Ultravox/Generated/Ultravox.Models.UltravoxV1BaseToolDefinition.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Ultravox/Generated/Ultravox.Models.UltravoxV1CallTool.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/Ultravox/openapi.yaml (2 hunks)

Comment on lines +1646 to +1649
timeout:
pattern: '^-?(?:0|[1-9][0-9]{0,11})(?:\.[0-9]{1,9})?s$'
type: string
description: "The maximum amount of time the tool is allowed for execution. The conversation is frozen\n while tools run, so prefer sticking to the default unless you're comfortable with that\n consequence. If your tool is too slow for the default and can't be made faster, still try to\n keep this timeout as low as possible.\n Note: For read APIs, 0s actually means unset (i.e. use the default)."
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider schema reuse for timeout definition.

The timeout field is duplicated between BaseToolDefinition and CallTool with identical pattern and description. Additionally, like its counterpart, it allows negative durations.

Consider:

  1. Creating a shared schema component for the timeout field
  2. Updating the pattern to disallow negative values
# Add to components.schemas
    DurationTimeout:
      pattern: '^(?:0|[1-9][0-9]{0,11})(?:\.[0-9]{1,9})?s$'
      type: string
      description: "The maximum amount of time the tool is allowed for execution. The conversation is frozen\n while tools run, so prefer sticking to the default unless you're comfortable with that\n consequence. If your tool is too slow for the default and can't be made faster, still try to\n keep this timeout as low as possible.\n Note: For read APIs, 0s actually means unset (i.e. use the default)."

# Then reference it in both schemas
    timeout:
      $ref: '#/components/schemas/DurationTimeout'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant