-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat:Updated OpenAPI spec #29
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes primarily streamline the JSON serialization and deserialization processes across multiple converters in the codebase. The modifications eliminate validation checks during these operations, allowing for a more lenient handling of potentially invalid data. While this enhances code readability and reduces complexity, it may increase the risk of downstream errors due to the lack of initial validation. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Service
participant Converter
User->>Service: Request to process data
Service->>Converter: Serialize request
Converter-->>Service: Return serialized content
Service->>User: Response with result
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (14)
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.AnyOf2.g.cs (2 hunks)
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.CreateModelStatus.g.cs (2 hunks)
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.DoneReason.g.cs (2 hunks)
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.PullModelStatus.g.cs (2 hunks)
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ChatClient.GenerateChatCompletion.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.CompletionsClient.GenerateCompletion.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.EmbeddingsClient.GenerateEmbedding.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CopyModel.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CreateBlob.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CreateModel.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.DeleteModel.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.PullModel.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.PushModel.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.ShowModelInfo.g.cs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ChatClient.GenerateChatCompletion.g.cs
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.CompletionsClient.GenerateCompletion.g.cs
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.EmbeddingsClient.GenerateEmbedding.g.cs
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CopyModel.g.cs
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CreateBlob.g.cs
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CreateModel.g.cs
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.DeleteModel.g.cs
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.PullModel.g.cs
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.PushModel.g.cs
- src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.ShowModelInfo.g.cs
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.CreateModelStatus.g.cs (2)
Line range hint
62-84
:
Reconsider removing validation checks before serialization.The removal of validation checks for the
value
object before serialization could lead to the serialization of potentially invalid object states. While this change reduces complexity, it may introduce risks by allowing invalid data to be serialized.
42-60
: Consider reintroducing validation checks.The removal of validation checks for the
result
object during deserialization may lead to potential issues if invalid data is processed without being caught. While this change simplifies the code, it reduces robustness and could allow invalid data to propagate through the system.
|
||
var result = new global::System.AnyOf<T1, T2>( | ||
value1, | ||
|
||
value2 | ||
); | ||
if (!result.Validate()) | ||
{ | ||
throw new global::System.Text.Json.JsonException($"Invalid JSON format for AnyOf<{typeof(T1).Name}, {typeof(T2).Name}>"); | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (value1 != null) | ||
{ | ||
var typeInfo = typeInfoResolver.GetTypeInfo(typeof(T1), options) as global::System.Text.Json.Serialization.Metadata.JsonTypeInfo<T1> ?? | ||
throw new global::System.InvalidOperationException($"Cannot get type info for {typeof(T1).Name}"); | ||
_ = global::System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.Deserialize(ref reader, typeInfo); | ||
} | ||
|
||
else if (value2 != null) | ||
{ | ||
var typeInfo = typeInfoResolver.GetTypeInfo(typeof(T2), options) as global::System.Text.Json.Serialization.Metadata.JsonTypeInfo<T2> ?? | ||
throw new global::System.InvalidOperationException($"Cannot get type info for {typeof(T2).Name}"); | ||
_ = global::System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.Deserialize(ref reader, typeInfo); | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider reintroducing validation checks for data integrity.
The removal of validation checks in the deserialization process can lead to potential issues with handling invalid data. Without these checks, invalid data might be silently accepted, which could cause downstream errors or inconsistencies.
Consider reintroducing some form of validation to ensure data integrity and prevent potential issues.
|
||
var result = new global::Ollama.DoneReason( | ||
value1, | ||
|
||
value2 | ||
); | ||
if (!result.Validate()) | ||
{ | ||
throw new global::System.Text.Json.JsonException($"Invalid JSON format for AnyOf<{typeof(string).Name}, {typeof(global::Ollama.DoneReasonEnum).Name}>"); | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (value1 != null) | ||
{ | ||
var typeInfo = typeInfoResolver.GetTypeInfo(typeof(string), options) as global::System.Text.Json.Serialization.Metadata.JsonTypeInfo<string> ?? | ||
throw new global::System.InvalidOperationException($"Cannot get type info for {typeof(string).Name}"); | ||
_ = global::System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.Deserialize(ref reader, typeInfo); | ||
} | ||
|
||
else if (value2 != null) | ||
{ | ||
var typeInfo = typeInfoResolver.GetTypeInfo(typeof(global::Ollama.DoneReasonEnum), options) as global::System.Text.Json.Serialization.Metadata.JsonTypeInfo<global::Ollama.DoneReasonEnum> ?? | ||
throw new global::System.InvalidOperationException($"Cannot get type info for {typeof(global::Ollama.DoneReasonEnum).Name}"); | ||
_ = global::System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.Deserialize(ref reader, typeInfo); | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reevaluate the removal of validation checks for reliability.
The removal of validation checks in the deserialization process can result in invalid data being processed without triggering exceptions. This change might affect the reliability of the application by allowing potentially inconsistent data to propagate through the system.
Consider implementing alternative validation mechanisms to ensure data consistency and reliability.
|
||
var result = new global::Ollama.PullModelStatus( | ||
value1, | ||
|
||
value2 | ||
); | ||
if (!result.Validate()) | ||
{ | ||
throw new global::System.Text.Json.JsonException($"Invalid JSON format for AnyOf<{typeof(string).Name}, {typeof(global::Ollama.PullModelStatusEnum).Name}>"); | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (value1 != null) | ||
{ | ||
var typeInfo = typeInfoResolver.GetTypeInfo(typeof(string), options) as global::System.Text.Json.Serialization.Metadata.JsonTypeInfo<string> ?? | ||
throw new global::System.InvalidOperationException($"Cannot get type info for {typeof(string).Name}"); | ||
_ = global::System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.Deserialize(ref reader, typeInfo); | ||
} | ||
|
||
else if (value2 != null) | ||
{ | ||
var typeInfo = typeInfoResolver.GetTypeInfo(typeof(global::Ollama.PullModelStatusEnum), options) as global::System.Text.Json.Serialization.Metadata.JsonTypeInfo<global::Ollama.PullModelStatusEnum> ?? | ||
throw new global::System.InvalidOperationException($"Cannot get type info for {typeof(global::Ollama.PullModelStatusEnum).Name}"); | ||
_ = global::System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.Deserialize(ref reader, typeInfo); | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Assess the impact of removing validation checks on system stability.
The removal of validation checks in the deserialization process may lead to invalid data being processed without error handling, which could compromise system stability. This change might allow inconsistent data to be serialized and deserialized without triggering exceptions.
Consider reintroducing validation mechanisms to maintain data integrity and ensure system stability.
Created by Github Actions
Summary by CodeRabbit