Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat:Updated OpenAPI spec #29

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Aug 15, 2024

Created by Github Actions

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a more lenient handling of JSON data during deserialization and serialization processes, allowing for increased flexibility in data processing.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Removed validation checks that could lead to runtime errors if the JSON format is invalid, potentially improving application stability.
  • Refactor
    • Enhanced code readability by refactoring serialization logic into separate variables for better maintainability and debugging across multiple client methods.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes primarily streamline the JSON serialization and deserialization processes across multiple converters in the codebase. The modifications eliminate validation checks during these operations, allowing for a more lenient handling of potentially invalid data. While this enhances code readability and reduces complexity, it may increase the risk of downstream errors due to the lack of initial validation.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.AnyOf2.g.cs, JsonConverters.CreateModelStatus.g.cs, DoneReason.g.cs, PullModelStatus.g.cs Removed validation checks during serialization and deserialization, allowing potentially invalid objects.
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ChatClient.GenerateChatCompletion.g.cs, CompletionsClient.GenerateCompletion.g.cs, EmbeddingsClient.GenerateEmbedding.g.cs, ModelsClient.CopyModel.g.cs, CreateBlob.g.cs, CreateModel.g.cs, DeleteModel.g.cs, PullModel.g.cs, PushModel.g.cs, ShowModelInfo.g.cs Refactored serialization logic to enhance readability by saving serialized content to a variable before using it.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Service
    participant Converter

    User->>Service: Request to process data
    Service->>Converter: Serialize request
    Converter-->>Service: Return serialized content
    Service->>User: Response with result
Loading

🐇 In the code's burrow, changes abound,
Validations gone, errors less profound.
Serialization dances, readability shines,
Data flows freely, like wiggly lines!
So hop with joy, let the bytes play,
In the world of code, it’s a brighter day! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot enabled auto-merge August 15, 2024 15:22
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5cb58bd and 152ff6a.

Files selected for processing (14)
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.AnyOf2.g.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.CreateModelStatus.g.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.DoneReason.g.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.PullModelStatus.g.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ChatClient.GenerateChatCompletion.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.CompletionsClient.GenerateCompletion.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.EmbeddingsClient.GenerateEmbedding.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CopyModel.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CreateBlob.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CreateModel.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.DeleteModel.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.PullModel.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.PushModel.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.ShowModelInfo.g.cs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ChatClient.GenerateChatCompletion.g.cs
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.CompletionsClient.GenerateCompletion.g.cs
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.EmbeddingsClient.GenerateEmbedding.g.cs
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CopyModel.g.cs
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CreateBlob.g.cs
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.CreateModel.g.cs
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.DeleteModel.g.cs
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.PullModel.g.cs
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.PushModel.g.cs
  • src/libs/Ollama/Generated/Ollama.ModelsClient.ShowModelInfo.g.cs
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/libs/Ollama/Generated/JsonConverters.CreateModelStatus.g.cs (2)

Line range hint 62-84:
Reconsider removing validation checks before serialization.

The removal of validation checks for the value object before serialization could lead to the serialization of potentially invalid object states. While this change reduces complexity, it may introduce risks by allowing invalid data to be serialized.


42-60: Consider reintroducing validation checks.

The removal of validation checks for the result object during deserialization may lead to potential issues if invalid data is processed without being caught. While this change simplifies the code, it reduces robustness and could allow invalid data to propagate through the system.

Comment on lines +41 to +59

var result = new global::System.AnyOf<T1, T2>(
value1,

value2
);
if (!result.Validate())
{
throw new global::System.Text.Json.JsonException($"Invalid JSON format for AnyOf<{typeof(T1).Name}, {typeof(T2).Name}>");
}

if (value1 != null)
{
var typeInfo = typeInfoResolver.GetTypeInfo(typeof(T1), options) as global::System.Text.Json.Serialization.Metadata.JsonTypeInfo<T1> ??
throw new global::System.InvalidOperationException($"Cannot get type info for {typeof(T1).Name}");
_ = global::System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.Deserialize(ref reader, typeInfo);
}

else if (value2 != null)
{
var typeInfo = typeInfoResolver.GetTypeInfo(typeof(T2), options) as global::System.Text.Json.Serialization.Metadata.JsonTypeInfo<T2> ??
throw new global::System.InvalidOperationException($"Cannot get type info for {typeof(T2).Name}");
_ = global::System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.Deserialize(ref reader, typeInfo);
}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider reintroducing validation checks for data integrity.

The removal of validation checks in the deserialization process can lead to potential issues with handling invalid data. Without these checks, invalid data might be silently accepted, which could cause downstream errors or inconsistencies.

Consider reintroducing some form of validation to ensure data integrity and prevent potential issues.

Comment on lines +42 to +60

var result = new global::Ollama.DoneReason(
value1,

value2
);
if (!result.Validate())
{
throw new global::System.Text.Json.JsonException($"Invalid JSON format for AnyOf<{typeof(string).Name}, {typeof(global::Ollama.DoneReasonEnum).Name}>");
}

if (value1 != null)
{
var typeInfo = typeInfoResolver.GetTypeInfo(typeof(string), options) as global::System.Text.Json.Serialization.Metadata.JsonTypeInfo<string> ??
throw new global::System.InvalidOperationException($"Cannot get type info for {typeof(string).Name}");
_ = global::System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.Deserialize(ref reader, typeInfo);
}

else if (value2 != null)
{
var typeInfo = typeInfoResolver.GetTypeInfo(typeof(global::Ollama.DoneReasonEnum), options) as global::System.Text.Json.Serialization.Metadata.JsonTypeInfo<global::Ollama.DoneReasonEnum> ??
throw new global::System.InvalidOperationException($"Cannot get type info for {typeof(global::Ollama.DoneReasonEnum).Name}");
_ = global::System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.Deserialize(ref reader, typeInfo);
}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reevaluate the removal of validation checks for reliability.

The removal of validation checks in the deserialization process can result in invalid data being processed without triggering exceptions. This change might affect the reliability of the application by allowing potentially inconsistent data to propagate through the system.

Consider implementing alternative validation mechanisms to ensure data consistency and reliability.

Comment on lines +42 to +60

var result = new global::Ollama.PullModelStatus(
value1,

value2
);
if (!result.Validate())
{
throw new global::System.Text.Json.JsonException($"Invalid JSON format for AnyOf<{typeof(string).Name}, {typeof(global::Ollama.PullModelStatusEnum).Name}>");
}

if (value1 != null)
{
var typeInfo = typeInfoResolver.GetTypeInfo(typeof(string), options) as global::System.Text.Json.Serialization.Metadata.JsonTypeInfo<string> ??
throw new global::System.InvalidOperationException($"Cannot get type info for {typeof(string).Name}");
_ = global::System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.Deserialize(ref reader, typeInfo);
}

else if (value2 != null)
{
var typeInfo = typeInfoResolver.GetTypeInfo(typeof(global::Ollama.PullModelStatusEnum), options) as global::System.Text.Json.Serialization.Metadata.JsonTypeInfo<global::Ollama.PullModelStatusEnum> ??
throw new global::System.InvalidOperationException($"Cannot get type info for {typeof(global::Ollama.PullModelStatusEnum).Name}");
_ = global::System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.Deserialize(ref reader, typeInfo);
}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assess the impact of removing validation checks on system stability.

The removal of validation checks in the deserialization process may lead to invalid data being processed without error handling, which could compromise system stability. This change might allow inconsistent data to be serialized and deserialized without triggering exceptions.

Consider reintroducing validation mechanisms to maintain data integrity and ensure system stability.

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit bd4c17c into main Aug 16, 2024
3 checks passed
@HavenDV HavenDV deleted the bot/update-openapi_202408151521 branch August 16, 2024 09:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant