Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat:Enhance DeepInfra OpenAPI with Improved Error Handling and New Endpoint #98

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Dec 16, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new endpoint to retrieve user-associated Lora models (GET /v1/user/loras).
  • Enhancements
    • Added 403 Forbidden response status for specific inference endpoints.
    • Updated response schema for GET /v1/api-tokens to clarify API token structure.
    • Modified POST /v1/api-tokens to include 409 Conflict response for token creation issues.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces enhancements to the DeepInfra OpenAPI specification, focusing on improving error handling and API endpoint clarity. The changes include adding new response status codes for forbidden access, introducing a new endpoint for retrieving Lora models, and refining the response schemas for API token-related operations. These modifications aim to provide more precise and informative API interactions.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml - Added 403 Forbidden response to /v1/inference/deploy/{deploy_id} and /v1/inference/{model_name} endpoints
- Introduced new GET /v1/user/loras endpoint for retrieving Lora models
- Updated GET /v1/api-tokens response schema
- Added 409 Conflict response to POST /v1/api-tokens

Poem

🐰 In the realm of DeepInfra's might,
APIs dance with error's light
Forbidden paths and tokens clear
Lora models now appear
Code flows smooth, no more a plight! 🔑


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot enabled auto-merge December 16, 2024 15:20
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Enhance DeepInfra OpenAPI with Improved Error Handling and New Endpoint Dec 16, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml (2)

Line range hint 1-24: Consider standardizing authentication methods

The API currently uses two authentication methods:

  1. Bearer token authentication
  2. xi-api-key header

Consider:

  • Documenting the difference between these authentication methods
  • Clarifying when each should be used
  • Potentially standardizing on a single authentication method if possible

Line range hint 1-24: Consider adding rate limit response headers

The API would benefit from documenting standard rate limit response headers such as:

  • X-RateLimit-Limit
  • X-RateLimit-Remaining
  • X-RateLimit-Reset

This would help clients better manage their API usage.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 971522c and bff5f1d.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/Generated/DeepInfra.DeepInfraApi.InferenceDeploy.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml (2)

1214-1219: LGTM: 403 Forbidden response addition is appropriate

The addition of the 403 Forbidden response with DeepError schema improves the API documentation by explicitly indicating possible authorization failures.


1214-1219: LGTM: API token endpoint schemas are well-defined

The API token endpoints have proper schema definitions with:

  • Clear response types using ApiToken schema
  • Appropriate error responses including 409 Conflict
  • Required fields properly marked

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 915d282 into main Dec 16, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant