Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat:Add GET endpoint for retrieving user Lora models in OpenAPI specification #92

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Nov 27, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new endpoint to retrieve user-associated Lora models via GET request at /v1/user/loras.
    • Enhanced API functionality with structured responses for successful retrieval and validation errors.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new endpoint to the OpenAPI specification for the DeepApi. A GET method is added for the path /v1/user/loras, allowing users to retrieve their associated Lora models. The endpoint includes necessary parameters, such as the xi-api-key in the header, and defines response schemas for both successful responses and validation errors. The overall structure and formatting of the OpenAPI document remain consistent with previous versions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml Added a new endpoint GET /v1/user/loras with operation ID get_user_loras_v1_user_loras_get. Defined response schemas for successful responses and validation errors.

Poem

In the garden of code, a new path does bloom,
/v1/user/loras, dispelling the gloom.
With keys in our hands, we gather our lore,
Fetching models anew, oh, what joy to explore!
A hop and a skip, through data we race,
In the world of APIs, we find our place! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot enabled auto-merge November 27, 2024 12:37
@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit c410406 into main Nov 27, 2024
3 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Add GET endpoint for retrieving user Lora models in OpenAPI specification Nov 27, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 610aa71 and d1c7c7e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/Generated/DeepInfra.DeepInfraApi.GetUserLoras.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/Generated/DeepInfra.IDeepInfraApi.GetUserLoras.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/Generated/DeepInfra.Models.GetUserLorasV1UserLorasGetResponse.Json.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/Generated/DeepInfra.Models.GetUserLorasV1UserLorasGetResponse.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml (1)

2176-2199: LGTM on endpoint structure.

The endpoint follows consistent patterns with other endpoints in the API:

  • Uses standard authentication via xi-api-key header
  • Follows RESTful conventions
  • Includes standard validation error response
  • Uses consistent security scheme

Comment on lines +2176 to +2199
/v1/user/loras:
get:
summary: Get User Loras
operationId: get_user_loras_v1_user_loras_get
parameters:
- name: xi-api-key
in: header
schema:
title: Xi-Api-Key
type: string
responses:
'200':
description: Successful Response
content:
application/json:
schema: { }
'422':
description: Validation Error
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/HTTPValidationError'
security:
- HTTPBearer: [ ]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Define response schema for successful response.

The endpoint's successful response schema is currently empty ({}). This makes it unclear what data structure consumers should expect. Consider defining a proper response schema to improve API documentation and maintainability.

Consider adding a response schema similar to this:

  responses:
    '200':
      description: Successful Response
      content:
        application/json:
          schema: { }
+         schema:
+           type: object
+           properties:
+             loras:
+               type: array
+               items:
+                 type: object
+                 properties:
+                   name:
+                     type: string
+                   description:
+                     type: string
+                   created_at:
+                     type: string
+                     format: date-time
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
/v1/user/loras:
get:
summary: Get User Loras
operationId: get_user_loras_v1_user_loras_get
parameters:
- name: xi-api-key
in: header
schema:
title: Xi-Api-Key
type: string
responses:
'200':
description: Successful Response
content:
application/json:
schema: { }
'422':
description: Validation Error
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/HTTPValidationError'
security:
- HTTPBearer: [ ]
/v1/user/loras:
get:
summary: Get User Loras
operationId: get_user_loras_v1_user_loras_get
parameters:
- name: xi-api-key
in: header
schema:
title: Xi-Api-Key
type: string
responses:
'200':
description: Successful Response
content:
application/json:
schema:
type: object
properties:
loras:
type: array
items:
type: object
properties:
name:
type: string
description:
type: string
created_at:
type: string
format: date-time
'422':
description: Validation Error
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/HTTPValidationError'
security:
- HTTPBearer: [ ]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant