feat:Add accepts parameter and ChatAccepts enum to CohereApi methods
#41
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve the addition of a new parameter, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant API
participant JSONConverter
Client->>API: Send chat request with accepts header
API->>JSONConverter: Serialize request with accepts
JSONConverter-->>API: Return serialized request
API->>Client: Send response
Client->>API: Request response in specific format
API->>JSONConverter: Deserialize response with accepts
JSONConverter-->>API: Return deserialized response
API->>Client: Return formatted response
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
coderabbitai
bot
changed the title
accepts parameter and ChatAccepts enum to CohereApi methods
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatAccepts.g.cs (1)
9-15: Add a summary description for theChatAcceptsenum.The
ChatAcceptsenum is missing a summary description in its XML documentation comment. Consider adding a brief description to clarify the purpose and usage of this enum.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.CohereApi.Chat.g.cs (7 hunks)
- src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatAccepts.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Cohere/Generated/JsonConverters.ChatAccepts.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Cohere/Generated/JsonConverters.ChatAcceptsNullable.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Cohere/Generated/JsonSerializerContext.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Cohere/Generated/JsonSerializerContextTypes.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (15)
src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.Models.ChatAccepts.g.cs (2)
25-32: LGTM!The
ToValueStringextension method is well-implemented, using a switch expression to convert the enum value to its string representation and properly handling unrecognized values with anArgumentOutOfRangeException.
36-43: LGTM!The
ToEnumextension method is well-implemented, using a switch expression to convert a string to its correspondingChatAcceptsenum value and properly handling unrecognized values by returningnull.src/libs/Cohere/Generated/JsonConverters.ChatAccepts.g.cs (2)
9-36: LGTM!The
Readmethod correctly handles the deserialization of theChatAcceptsenum from JSON. It properly distinguishes between string and number token types and uses appropriate methods to retrieve the corresponding values. The fallback to the default enum value for invalid string tokens is a reasonable approach, and the direct casting of integer values to the enum follows the common convention.
39-47: LGTM!The
Writemethod correctly serializes theChatAcceptsenum to JSON. It uses theToValueStringextension method to convert the enum value to its string representation and writes the string value to the JSON writer. The null check for the JSON writer is a good practice to handle potential null reference exceptions.src/libs/Cohere/Generated/JsonConverters.ChatAcceptsNullable.g.cs (1)
1-56: LGTM!The custom JSON converter class
ChatAcceptsNullableJsonConverteris implemented correctly and follows best practices. It properly handles the serialization and deserialization of nullableChatAcceptsenum values.The
Readmethod correctly deserializes string and number JSON tokens toChatAccepts?values, while theWritemethod correctly serializesChatAccepts?values to JSON. The code also includes appropriate null checks, usesnameoffor exception parameter names, and handles nullable reference types correctly.Great job!
src/libs/Cohere/Generated/JsonSerializerContext.g.cs (1)
112-113: LGTM!The addition of the
ChatAcceptsJsonConverterandChatAcceptsNullableJsonConverterto the list of converters is consistent with the AI-generated summary and follows the established pattern in the file. The changes are limited to the addition of the converters and do not affect the rest of the file.src/libs/Cohere/Generated/Cohere.CohereApi.Chat.g.cs (4)
Line range hint
6-12: LGTM!The addition of the
acceptsparameter to thePrepareChatArgumentsmethod looks good. Passing it by reference allows the argument value to be modified within the partial method implementation.
13-19: LGTM!The addition of the
acceptsparameter to thePrepareChatRequestmethod looks good. Passing it by value is appropriate for a request preparation method.
Line range hint
29-114: LGTM!The addition of the
acceptsparameter to theChatAsyncmethod looks good. It has a default value, making it optional, and is correctly passed to the relevant methods for preparing the chat arguments and request.
Line range hint
116-350: LGTM!The addition of the
acceptsparameter to the overloadedChatAsyncmethod looks good. It has a default value, making it optional, and is correctly passed to the otherChatAsyncmethod, which handles the actual chat request.src/libs/Cohere/Generated/JsonSerializerContextTypes.g.cs (4)
1212-1212: LGTM!The change to the
Type299property type fromChatResponse3toChatResponse2is part of the sequential renaming pattern and looks good.
1216-2592: LGTM!The sequential renaming of properties
Type300toType643, and the introduction of the newType644property, are consistent with the AI-generated summary and appear to be intentional and correct. The changes look good.
1204-1204: Verify the usage of theType297property.The change to the
Type297property type is consistent with the addition of theChatAcceptsenumeration. Please ensure that all usages of this property have been updated to handle the newChatAcceptstype correctly.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
Type297property:Verification successful
No usage of
Type297found in the codebase.The
Type297property is not used elsewhere in the codebase, so the change to theChatAcceptstype does not impact other parts of the code. No further action is required.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `Type297` property are compatible with the new `ChatAccepts` type. # Test: Search for read access to the property. Expect: Usages to handle `ChatAccepts` type. rg --type csharp -A 5 $'JsonSerializerContextTypes\.Type297' # Test: Search for write access to the property. Expect: Assignments to use `ChatAccepts` type. rg --type csharp -A 5 $'JsonSerializerContextTypes\.Type297\s*='Length of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Perform a broader search for any usage of the `Type297` property in the codebase. # Search for any mention of `Type297` to identify its usage context. rg --type csharp 'Type297'Length of output: 149
1208-1208: Verify the usage of theType298property.The change to the
Type298property type introduces a union type involvingNonStreamedChatResponseandStreamedChatResponse. Please ensure that all usages of this property have been updated to handle the new union type correctly.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
Type298property:Verification successful
Change to
Type298is consistent with codebase usage.The introduction of the union type
OneOf<NonStreamedChatResponse, StreamedChatResponse?>for theType298property aligns with the usage patterns observed in the codebase, particularly in serialization and API methods. The change appears to be well-integrated and consistent with the overall design.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `Type298` property are compatible with the new union type. # Test: Search for read access to the property. Expect: Usages to handle the union type. rg --type csharp -A 5 $'JsonSerializerContextTypes\.Type298' # Test: Search for write access to the property. Expect: Assignments to use the union type. rg --type csharp -A 5 $'JsonSerializerContextTypes\.Type298\s*='Length of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for indirect usage of the `Type298` property by looking for its type and related patterns. # Test: Search for usage of the type `OneOf<NonStreamedChatResponse, StreamedChatResponse?>`. rg --type csharp -A 5 $'OneOf<NonStreamedChatResponse, StreamedChatResponse\\?>' # Test: Search for any references to `NonStreamedChatResponse` and `StreamedChatResponse` that might indicate indirect usage. rg --type csharp -A 5 $'NonStreamedChatResponse|StreamedChatResponse'Length of output: 53746
src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml (1)
25-34: LGTM!The addition of the
Acceptsheader parameter to thechatoperation is a great enhancement to the API. It provides a mechanism for real-time data streaming, which could be particularly useful for applications requiring live updates or continuous data feeds.The parameter is well-documented with a clear description and example value. The use of the
x-fern-audiencesextension to mark the parameter as public is also a good practice.Overall, the changes are consistent with the AI-generated summary and improve the functionality and usability of the API.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Acceptsheader parameter for the chat operation, enabling real-time data streaming.acceptsparameter.acceptsparameter across various methods.ChatAcceptstypes, improving serialization and deserialization processes.