feat:Add user authentication feature with JWT and session management #33
Conversation
WalkthroughThe updates to the Cohere API's OpenAPI specification include renaming datasets and modifying model settings to better reflect their intended use. The dataset names have shifted from "chat-dataset" to "prompt-completion-dataset," and the corresponding types have been updated. Additionally, the base model type has transitioned from Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant API
participant SDK
User->>SDK: Request to create dataset
SDK->>API: Create prompt-completion-dataset
API-->>SDK: Dataset created confirmation
SDK-->>User: Confirmation received
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
coderabbitai
bot
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml (7 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (7)
src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml (7)
4559-4568: LGTM!The changes to the dataset names and types in the SDK examples are consistent with the shift in focus from chat-based datasets to prompt-completion datasets, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
6048-6055: LGTM!The changes to the fine-tuned model name and base type are consistent with the new dataset and model types, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary. This reflects the broader application of the model capabilities beyond just chat functionalities.
6160-6160: LGTM!The change to the base type is consistent with the broader application of the model capabilities beyond just chat functionalities, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
6210-6216: LGTM!The changes to the base type in the SDK examples for creating fine-tuned models are consistent with the broader application of the model capabilities beyond just chat functionalities, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
6225-6225: LGTM!The change to the base type in the cURL example for creating a fine-tuned model is consistent with the broader application of the model capabilities beyond just chat functionalities, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
6337-6337: LGTM!The change to the base type in the Java SDK example for updating a fine-tuned model is consistent with the broader application of the model capabilities beyond just chat functionalities, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
6380-6387: LGTM!The changes to the fine-tuned model name and base type are consistent with the new dataset and model types, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary. This reflects the broader application of the model capabilities beyond just chat functionalities.
Summary by CodeRabbit