feat:Update openapi.yaml file in src/libs/Cohere directory #116
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
coderabbitai
bot
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml (1)
801-864: LGTM! Parameter specifications are comprehensive.All parameters have been properly marked as public API surface with clear documentation. The specifications include well-defined constraints, defaults, and explanations.
Consider adding a dedicated section in the documentation about parameter interactions, particularly:
- The relationship between
temperature,k, andpfor controlling randomness- The difference and trade-offs between using
frequency_penaltyvspresence_penalty- The impact of combining
max_tokenswithstop_sequencesThis would help users better understand how to effectively combine these parameters.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml(3 hunks)
🔥 Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml: Error: Server error: no LLM provider could handle the message
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml (2)
789-790: LGTM! Document parameter visibility is properly configured.
The x-fern-audiences tag correctly marks this parameter as part of the public API surface. The parameter's documentation clearly explains its dual-type support and purpose.
765-775: LGTM! Documentation and visibility settings are well defined.
The x-fern-audiences tags correctly mark these parameters as public API surface. The tools parameter documentation clearly explains the expected behavior and response format.
Let's verify the tool definitions referenced in the documentation:
✅ Verification successful
Tool definitions and response schemas are properly defined and aligned with documentation
The verification confirms that:
- The
ToolV2schema is well-defined with proper function name, description, and parameters structure - The tool call response schemas (
ToolCall,ToolCallV2,ToolCallDelta) are properly implemented - The streaming events for tool calls are properly structured with appropriate public visibility tags
- All schemas align with the documentation provided in the original review comment
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for tool definitions and examples in the codebase
# Look for tool-related schemas and examples
rg -A 10 "ToolV2:" src/
Length of output: 548
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's get more context about the ToolV2 schema definition
rg -A 20 "ToolV2:" src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml
# Also check for any tool call response schemas
rg -A 10 "ToolCall" src/libs/Cohere/openapi.yaml
Length of output: 10294
Summary by CodeRabbit