Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

108 make output messages optional #198

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Apr 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

wcornwell
Copy link
Contributor

Working on #108 and #194

@wcornwell wcornwell linked an issue Apr 21, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@wcornwell wcornwell requested a review from fontikar April 21, 2024 07:05
@fontikar fontikar mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2024
@@ -149,29 +157,29 @@ align_taxa <- function(original_name,
# take unique values so each name only processed once
dplyr::filter(!duplicated(original_name))

if (all(taxa$tocheck$checked)) {
if (all(taxa$tocheck$checked)|all(is.na(taxa$tocheck$checked))) {
message(" - all taxa are already checked, yay!")
return(invisible(taxa$tocheck))
Copy link
Collaborator

@fontikar fontikar Apr 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we also have a progress bar for alignment please like the load_taxonomic_resources one? I think it will be useful for larger datasets.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@wcornwell wcornwell Apr 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, but maybe needs to be part of #191 ? adding the progress bar before re-factoring might make re-factor more confusing

Copy link
Collaborator

@fontikar fontikar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor request for a progress bar for align_taxa otherwise it looks great! I like the output argument!

@fontikar
Copy link
Collaborator

@wcornwell if you merge in develop into 108-make-output-messages-optional macOS should pass

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/develop' into 108-make-output-messages-optional

# Conflicts:
#	DESCRIPTION
@wcornwell wcornwell merged commit 3cf5388 into develop Apr 23, 2024
5 checks passed
@wcornwell wcornwell deleted the 108-make-output-messages-optional branch April 23, 2024 00:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make output messages optional
2 participants