-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 724
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tools/ctl: add caller ID for pd-ctl
#8214
Conversation
Signed-off-by: husharp <[email protected]>
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
@okJiang PTAL, thx! |
func TestSendAndGetComponent(t *testing.T) { | ||
re := require.New(t) | ||
handler := func(context.Context, *server.Server) (http.Handler, apiutil.APIServiceGroup, error) { | ||
mux := http.NewServeMux() | ||
mux.HandleFunc("/pd/api/v1/cluster", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For now, only cluster
command was replaced by PD HTTP SDK
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8214 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 77.29% 77.34% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 471 471
Lines 61445 61445
==========================================
+ Hits 47491 47527 +36
+ Misses 10395 10350 -45
- Partials 3559 3568 +9
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add a comment to explain why we need two handle for testing. Rest lgtm
@okJiang: Thanks for your review. The bot only counts approvals from reviewers and higher roles in list, but you're still welcome to leave your comments. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
Signed-off-by: husharp <[email protected]>
/merge |
@HuSharp: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 4daa1a7
|
/merge |
@JmPotato: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: Ref #7300
What is changed and how does it work?
After replacing HTTP with SDK #7490, we need to add the
calledID
explicitly to keep consistent with #4491And source ID can be consistent with caller ID, #7565
Check List
Tests
Release note