Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

client/http: implement more rule and batch related interfaces #7430

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 27, 2023

Conversation

JmPotato
Copy link
Member

@JmPotato JmPotato commented Nov 23, 2023

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #7300.

What is changed and how does it work?

- Implement more rule and batch related interfaces.
- Add more types and methods.
- Refine the tests.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test

Release note

None.

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 23, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • HuSharp
  • rleungx

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 23, 2023
client/http/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
client/http/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: JmPotato <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@HuSharp HuSharp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Nov 24, 2023
client/http/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@rleungx rleungx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The rest LGTM.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Nov 27, 2023
@JmPotato
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 27, 2023

@JmPotato: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 27, 2023

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 0eefb9c

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 27, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 58e9b20 into tikv:master Nov 27, 2023
22 checks passed
@JmPotato JmPotato deleted the refine_client_types branch November 27, 2023 05:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/api HTTP API. component/client Client logic. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants