-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 724
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
client/http: encapsulate rule-related PD HTTP interfaces #7397
Conversation
Signed-off-by: JmPotato <[email protected]>
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7397 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 74.26% 74.18% -0.09%
==========================================
Files 451 451
Lines 49119 49157 +38
==========================================
- Hits 36480 36466 -14
- Misses 9424 9457 +33
- Partials 3215 3234 +19
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
@@ -51,11 +52,24 @@ type Client interface { | |||
GetHotWriteRegions(context.Context) (*StoreHotPeersInfos, error) | |||
GetRegionStatusByKeyRange(context.Context, []byte, []byte) (*RegionStats, error) | |||
GetStores(context.Context) (*StoresInfo, error) | |||
/* Rule-related interfaces */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have two groups of API for the placement rule, maybe we can reduce it later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, after replacing the existing TiDB code, we can reduce the exposed interfaces here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Signed-off-by: JmPotato <[email protected]>
fe929aa
to
cd5397a
Compare
/merge |
@JmPotato: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: cd5397a
|
@JmPotato: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you. If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #7300.
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Release note