Update show for GroupAlgebraElem with sparse rep #1688
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Let me show the current issue with an example. To reproduce, you need the branch https://github.com/oscar-system/Oscar.jl/tree/lg/character-ring together with a dev'ed Hecke that includes #1685.
Thus I propose to instead of just writing the group elem as the basis elem, to do something like
e(g)
as often done in the literature. With this change enabled, the problematic lines from above change to the following, which IMO is a clear readability and disambiguation improvement.