Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Look for alternative distributions for LoS #49

Open
thibautjombart opened this issue Apr 1, 2020 · 10 comments
Open

Look for alternative distributions for LoS #49

thibautjombart opened this issue Apr 1, 2020 · 10 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers priority This needs to get done first

Comments

@thibautjombart
Copy link
Owner

Is mentioned elsewhere (#47) we should not rely on a single set of LoS distributions. It would be good to scan the literature for new distributions, select relevant ones, and add them to the app.

@thibautjombart thibautjombart added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers labels Apr 1, 2020
@thibautjombart
Copy link
Owner Author

@mert0248 not sure if you are happy looking into this, feel free to un-tag yourself if not

@erees
Copy link
Collaborator

erees commented Apr 1, 2020

Did a literature search and found these different estimates of LOS which might be useful:

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.21.20038778v1
Tian et al.
The average length of stay from onset to hospitalization was 4.1±3.7 days, and hospitalization duration average 16.1± 6.2 days.
Not completely clear where patients came from, but outside Wuhan

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2761044
Wang et al
Retrospective, single-center case series of the 138 consecutive hospitalized patients with confirmed NCIP at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University in Wuhan, China, from January 1 to January 28, 2020
Among those discharged alive (n = 47), the median hospital stay was 10 days (IQR, 7.0-14.0).

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-symptom-progression-11-03-2020.pdf
HK, Japan, Singapore, S. Korea
Gaythorpe
Table 5

Zhang et al
221 patients who were confirmed diagnosed as COVID-19 according to WHO interim guidance, from January 2 to February 10, 2020 at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan, China
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.02.20030452v1.full.pdf
Table 5
Duration of ICU stay (days)
ICU to ward tranfers: 8.0(5.0-13.0);
Death in ICU: 11.0(4.5-14.5)

Yang et al
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30079-5/fulltext
Other durations, but not length of stay explicitly - but might be possible to work out from other numbers reported.

@erees
Copy link
Collaborator

erees commented Apr 1, 2020

Also possible to caculate LOS from deaths (uk data) but will be biased to more severe cases?

@mert0248
Copy link
Collaborator

mert0248 commented Apr 1, 2020

@erees thanks I've been trying to collate results into a word doc an will share as a googledoc on slack.

@mert0248
Copy link
Collaborator

mert0248 commented Apr 1, 2020

Also possible to caculate LOS from deaths (uk data) but will be biased to more severe cases?

Which UK dataset? But yes will be biased if only deaths.

@erees
Copy link
Collaborator

erees commented Apr 1, 2020

Also possible to caculate LOS from deaths (uk data) but will be biased to more severe cases?

Which UK dataset? But yes will be biased if only deaths.

The dataset available in covid19 automation. I think it is all reported uk deaths but has admission dates and death date.

@johnurbanik
Copy link

Pulling it back in here, but the wuhan empirical dataset suggests mean of 15-17 days:

https://github.com/understand-covid/epi-modeling-toolkit/blob/master/parameter%20estimation/hospital_stay_analysis.ipynb

I'm inclined to believe that the studies coming from Wuhan are likely to be off, especially given the information intelligence report about data manipulation in China Bloomberg.

The study for outside of Hubei seems (slightly) more promising, and it's possible that we could back out an empirical mean from the same dataset as I used above (which has Guangzhou cases: https://github.com/c2-d2/COVID-19-wuhan-guangzhou-data).

If anyone aware of more datasets that include time series of hospitalizations, it's possible that one could fuse those datasets with the JHU CSSEGISandData data for deaths and recoveries (where countries have been reporting it).

@thibautjombart
Copy link
Owner Author

thibautjombart commented Apr 7, 2020

As of 8bae660 the app defaults to a custom distribution, with the 2 Zhou et al as other options. Further additions will be merely incremental, provided the distribution is already defined.

Also see this issue, which will be relevant for creating new distributions from published info.

@samclifford
Copy link
Collaborator

Is there a reason that the coefficient of variation maxes out at 1? Having CV > 1 gives you distributions which have a mode at the far left extreme. Also how well do small CVs play with the mean-1 trick, particularly at small mean lengths of stay?

@samclifford
Copy link
Collaborator

With the spin-off of the length of stay review into a new paper (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.30.20084780v1) can we close this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers priority This needs to get done first
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants