-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 321
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
west.yml: update Zephyr to 460c2167e4f3 #8386
west.yml: update Zephyr to 460c2167e4f3 #8386
Conversation
This should fix #8345 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Blanket approval since it enables LNL in CI
@keqiaozhang @marc-hb fyi - not seeing any results in CI, however status is reported. |
@tmleman There's a FrequencyMismatch / LowQuality fail in Intel QB with test_113_02_simple_internal_loopback on two platforms. Any idea if this could be related to the SRAM retention patches? Seems a bit farfetched, but I can't see other PRs on Zephyr side having on impact here. https://sof-ci.01.org/sof-pr-viewer/#/build/PR8386/build13001973 |
SOFCI TEST EDIT: https://sof-ci.01.org/sofpr/PR8386/build14137/devicetest and https://sof-ci.01.org/sofpr/PR8386/build14138/devicetest and were empty due to "new build service growing pains" |
Indeed farfetched when you take into account that there are changes that directly affect the ssp :) it will work if you will revert this zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#62596 Retention mode can affect performance, but I made manual test and there is regression on MTL in terms of SSP introduced by the PR mentioned above. There was a question about the correct value of |
More time is needed to find a good fix for the SSP drain problem, so for now, we'll revert the SSP changes zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#64458 and @ujfalusi will follow-up with a version of the patch that passes QB loopback test. This will unblock the Zephyr update to SOF in the meantime, but we'll need to wait until 64458 is merged. |
65f500a
to
00773c5
Compare
Contains 600+ commits merged after 3.5.0 release, including following directly affecting SOF targets: 76cb2a54f51f intel_adsp: Do not include device_runtime header 1fac5ed2a60b soc: xtensa/nxp_adsp: put guard in Kconfig.defconfig f4cb487b79f9 modules: sof: Options only when module is available 02deea0e806a ace: alh: Only ACE1.5 has OSEL feature f0326f72498c tests: dma_loopback: Intel ADSP ACE15 disable PM adf6d0e3d80e soc: intel_adsp: lpsram enable retention mode eeb4f2f76d6d soc: intel_adsp: hpsram enable retention mode 16f729214b50 soc: intel_adsp: lpsram init refactor 112611378f85 soc: intel_adsp: hpsram init refactor cdd4d8470323 xtensa: add custom mem range check functions Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <[email protected]>
v2 update:
|
All clean now, proceeding with merge. |
Contains 800+ commits merged after 3.5.0 release, including following directly affecting SOF targets:
f4cb487b79f9 modules: sof: Options only when module is available
02deea0e806a ace: alh: Only ACE1.5 has OSEL feature
f0326f72498c tests: dma_loopback: Intel ADSP ACE15 disable PM
adf6d0e3d80e soc: intel_adsp: lpsram enable retention mode
eeb4f2f76d6d soc: intel_adsp: hpsram enable retention mode
16f729214b50 soc: intel_adsp: lpsram init refactor
112611378f85 soc: intel_adsp: hpsram init refactor
cdd4d8470323 xtensa: add custom mem range check functions