Tech322/audio #137
Tech322/audio #137
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve a comprehensive update to the usage of the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/providers/PageLoadProvider.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-31: Consider documenting the Provider's API and migration guide.Given the significant refactoring and the addition of new features like audio playback, consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments to document the Provider's API
- Creating a migration guide for components switching from the old to new implementation
- Adding examples of common usage patterns
This will help maintain consistency across the many components using this Provider.
src/components/LoadingPage/LoadingPage.tsx (1)
15-15: Add accessibility attributes to the buttonThe button lacks proper accessibility attributes which are important for screen readers.
- <button className="fixed top-0 left-0 w-full h-full z-50" type="button" onClick={handleEnter}> + <button + className="fixed top-0 left-0 w-full h-full z-50" + type="button" + onClick={handleEnter} + aria-label="Enter system" + >src/components/Layout/BaseLayout/BaseLayout.tsx (1)
Line range hint
13-45: Consider component responsibilities and security enhancements.
The component handles multiple concerns (layout, camera feed, social links). Consider splitting it into smaller, more focused components for better maintainability.
For the external link, consider adding security headers:
- <a href="https://play.mynameisheno.xyz/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"> + <a + href="https://play.mynameisheno.xyz/" + target="_blank" + rel="noreferrer noopener" + referrerPolicy="no-referrer" + >src/hooks/usePageLoad.tsx (2)
37-39: Consider adding validation to page entry logicThe current implementation directly sets the entered state based on the pathname. Consider adding validation or handling edge cases.
useEffect(() => { - if (isEmployeePage) setEntered(true) + if (isEmployeePage && !entered) { + setEntered(true) + } else if (!isEmployeePage && entered) { + setEntered(false) + } }, [isEmployeePage, entered])
54-66: Improve hook API designConsider encapsulating internal state management by not exposing state setters directly. This will make the hook's API more predictable and easier to maintain.
return { entered, - setEntered, liveTime, - setGranted, granted, stream, - setStream, grantCamera, + stopCamera, // Add the new cleanup function videoRef, playAudio, }Also, consider adding methods for controlled state changes instead of exposing setters directly:
return { // ... other returns enterPage: () => setEntered(true), exitPage: () => setEntered(false), // ... other returns }src/components/LandingCard/LandingCard.tsx (1)
Line range hint
12-15: Consider improving accessibility and color usage.While not directly related to the current changes, here are some suggestions to improve the component:
- Replace the click handler with a proper button element for better accessibility
- Use Tailwind's built-in color classes instead of inline color values
Example improvement:
- // eslint-disable-next-line jsx-a11y/click-events-have-key-events, jsx-a11y/no-static-element-interactions - <div - className="p-[5px] md:p-2 border-[2px] border-gray_1 cursor-pointer font-dresden" - onClick={onClick} + <button + type="button" + className="p-[5px] md:p-2 border-[2px] border-gray_1 cursor-pointer font-dresden w-full text-left" + onClick={onClick}Similar color optimizations can be applied throughout the component:
-<div className="absolute inset-0 bg-[black] opacity-[0.75]" /> +<div className="absolute inset-0 bg-black/75" />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
public/INSTRUMENTAL 4 Heno_MadKeys Lemons Made Better GS INSTRUMENTAL 24 bit 48khz 082324 01 (1).wavis excluded by!**/*.wav,!**/*.wavpublic/images/Loading/loading.pngis excluded by!**/*.png,!**/*.pngpublic/images/Loading/m_loading.pngis excluded by!**/*.png,!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
src/components/LandingCard/LandingCard.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Layout/BaseLayout/BaseLayout.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Layout/FullLayout/FullLayout.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Layout/index.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/LoadingPage/LoadingPage.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Pages/LandingPage/LandingPage.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/RecBar/RecBar.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/WebCam/WebCam.tsx(1 hunks)src/hooks/usePageLoad.tsx(1 hunks)src/providers/PageLoadProvider.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
src/providers/PageLoadProvider.tsx (3)
21-26: LGTM! Well-structured context consumer hook.
The implementation follows React best practices with proper error handling and clear error messages.
3-4: Verify dependency structure between hooks.
Let's ensure there's no circular dependency between usePageLoad and usePageLoadProvider.
✅ Verification successful
No circular dependency found - hook structure is correct
The verification shows a clean dependency structure:
usePageLoadhook is properly implemented insrc/hooks/usePageLoad.tsxwith its own logicusePageLoadProvideris imported by various components but not byusePageLoad- The separation of concerns is correctly maintained with the hook logic in a dedicated file
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential circular dependencies
# Test 1: Check if usePageLoad imports usePageLoadProvider
echo "Checking usePageLoad hook implementation:"
rg -A 5 "import.*usePageLoadProvider" "src/hooks/usePageLoad"
# Test 2: Verify the hook's location and implementation
echo "Checking hook location and implementation:"
fd "usePageLoad.tsx?" -t f "src/hooks"
Length of output: 297
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to locate the hook file
echo "Searching for usePageLoad hook file:"
fd "usePageLoad"
# Search for any imports of usePageLoadProvider across the codebase
echo -e "\nChecking for usePageLoadProvider imports:"
rg "import.*usePageLoadProvider"
# Search for the actual implementation of usePageLoad
echo -e "\nSearching for usePageLoad implementation:"
ast-grep --pattern 'const usePageLoad = $_'
Length of output: 4539
9-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add TypeScript types for better type safety.
The current implementation uses any type which bypasses TypeScript's type checking. Consider defining an interface for the context value.
+interface PageLoadContextValue {
+ // Add specific types based on usePageLoad return value
+ // Example:
+ // isLoading: boolean;
+ // playAudio?: () => void;
+ [key: string]: any; // Temporary, remove once all properties are typed
+}
-const value: any = useMemo(
+const value: PageLoadContextValue = useMemo(Also, consider explicitly declaring which properties you want to expose from pageLoad instead of spreading all values.
✅ Verification successful
Add TypeScript interface for better type safety
+interface PageLoadContextValue {
+ entered: boolean;
+ setEntered: (value: boolean) => void;
+ liveTime: string;
+ granted: boolean;
+ setGranted: (value: boolean) => void;
+ stream: MediaStream | null;
+ setStream: (stream: MediaStream | null) => void;
+ grantCamera: () => Promise<void>;
+ videoRef: React.RefObject<HTMLVideoElement>;
+ playAudio: Promise<void>;
+}
-const value: any = useMemo(
+const value: PageLoadContextValue = useMemo(- The interface is derived from the actual return value of
usePageLoadhook - All components are currently using type assertion with
as any, which should be removed once the interface is in place - Consider explicitly spreading only the needed properties instead of all values to maintain better control over the exposed API
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usePageLoad hook's return type
echo "Checking usePageLoad exported types:"
rg -A 10 "interface|type.*export" "src/hooks/usePageLoad"
Length of output: 297
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the correct path for usePageLoad hook
fd -t f "usePageLoad"
# Then check its content and exported types
echo "Checking usePageLoad implementation:"
rg -A 10 "export.*usePageLoad|interface|type.*export" $(fd -t f "usePageLoad")
Length of output: 262
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the full implementation of usePageLoad hook
echo "Checking complete usePageLoad implementation:"
cat src/hooks/usePageLoad.tsx
# Also check where this hook is used to understand its return type
echo -e "\nChecking usages of usePageLoad:"
rg "usePageLoad" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 8965
src/components/Layout/FullLayout/FullLayout.tsx (2)
8-8: LGTM! Hook usage properly updated.
The hook usage has been correctly updated to match the new provider pattern, maintaining the same functionality while using the new API.
3-3: LGTM! Clean import update.
The import statement has been correctly updated to use the new usePageLoadProvider hook.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Import change is correctly implemented following Provider Pattern
The remaining usePageLoad references are expected as they are part of the Provider Pattern implementation:
usePageLoadis the base hook containing the core logicPageLoadProvideruses this base hook internallyusePageLoadProvideris the consumer hook that components should use
This is a common React pattern where the base hook is wrapped in a context provider to share its state across components. The import change in FullLayout.tsx correctly uses the new provider-wrapped hook.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that usePageLoad has been completely replaced with usePageLoadProvider
# Test 1: Check for any remaining usePageLoad imports
echo "Checking for any remaining usePageLoad imports..."
rg "import.*usePageLoad[^P]"
# Test 2: Check for any remaining usePageLoad hook usage
echo "Checking for any remaining usePageLoad hook calls..."
rg "usePageLoad\("
Length of output: 424
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the PageLoadProvider implementation to understand if this is expected
echo "Checking PageLoadProvider implementation..."
cat src/providers/PageLoadProvider.tsx
# Also check if usePageLoad hook still exists and is being used correctly
echo -e "\nChecking usePageLoad hook implementation..."
fd usePageLoad.ts -x cat {}
Length of output: 2662
src/components/LoadingPage/LoadingPage.tsx (2)
2-2: LGTM: Import statement correctly updated
The import statement has been properly updated to reflect the renamed hook.
9-12: LGTM: Well-structured event handler
The handleEnter function cleanly encapsulates both the state update and audio playback functionality.
src/components/Layout/index.tsx (1)
3-3: LGTM! Clean import update.
The import statement has been correctly updated to use the renamed hook, maintaining consistency with the broader refactoring effort across components.
src/components/RecBar/RecBar.tsx (2)
6-6: LGTM: Hook usage correctly updated.
The destructuring of liveTime from the new usePageLoadProvider hook is implemented correctly and maintains the same functionality.
2-2: Verify the hook renaming impact across the codebase.
The import statement has been updated from usePageLoad to usePageLoadProvider as part of a larger refactoring effort.
Let's verify that all usages have been consistently updated:
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if the hook usage has been consistently updated by checking the actual usage patterns in the files.
Hook renaming has been consistently implemented across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- All component imports correctly use
usePageLoadProvider - All component usages have been updated to
usePageLoadProvider() - The only
usePageLoadusage is within the provider itself, which is the expected pattern for custom hook implementations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that no old hook usages remain
# Expect: No occurrences of the old import pattern
# Search for any remaining old imports
rg "import.*usePageLoad.*from.*PageLoadProvider"
# Search for any remaining old hook usages
ast-grep --pattern 'const { $$ } = usePageLoad($$$)'
Length of output: 970
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any usage of usePageLoad hook
ast-grep --pattern 'usePageLoad($$$)'
# Search for usage patterns of usePageLoadProvider
ast-grep --pattern 'usePageLoadProvider($$$)'
Length of output: 910
src/components/Layout/BaseLayout/BaseLayout.tsx (2)
7-7: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.
The import statement has been properly updated to use the renamed hook.
11-11: Verify complete hook usage requirements.
While the hook rename is correct, let's verify that only the entered property is needed from usePageLoadProvider.
src/components/LandingCard/LandingCard.tsx (1)
3-3: LGTM! Hook migration looks correct.
The changes correctly update the import and usage of the renamed hook from usePageLoad to usePageLoadProvider, maintaining the same functionality while aligning with the broader refactoring effort.
Let's verify the consistency of this hook migration across the codebase:
Also applies to: 7-7
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to understand the relationship between usePageLoad and usePageLoadProvider:
This will help us verify if the remaining usePageLoad usage in PageLoadProvider.tsx is intentional and part of the proper abstraction layer.
Hook migration is correctly implemented
The remaining usage of usePageLoad in PageLoadProvider.tsx is intentional and correct. The codebase shows a proper abstraction layer where:
usePageLoadis the core hook with the actual implementationPageLoadProviderwraps this hook in a context providerusePageLoadProvideris the public-facing hook that components should use
The migration from direct usePageLoad usage to usePageLoadProvider in components is consistent across the codebase, following the provider pattern best practice.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that usePageLoad has been consistently renamed across the codebase
# Expected: No remaining instances of the old hook name
# Test 1: Check for any remaining usePageLoad imports
echo "Checking for remaining usePageLoad imports..."
rg "import.*usePageLoad[^P]"
# Test 2: Check for any remaining usePageLoad hook usage
echo "Checking for remaining usePageLoad hook usage..."
rg "usePageLoad\("
# Test 3: Verify consistent usage of new usePageLoadProvider
echo "Verifying usePageLoadProvider usage..."
rg "import.*usePageLoadProvider.*from.*PageLoadProvider"
Length of output: 1419
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of PageLoadProvider to understand the hook relationship
echo "Checking PageLoadProvider implementation..."
cat src/providers/PageLoadProvider.tsx
# Check if usePageLoad hook still exists and its implementation
echo "Checking usePageLoad hook implementation..."
fd usePageLoad.ts -x cat {}
Length of output: 2656
src/components/Pages/LandingPage/LandingPage.tsx (1)
3-3: LGTM! Import statement updated correctly.
The import statement has been properly updated to use the renamed hook.
src/hooks/usePageLoad.tsx
Outdated
| const isEmployeePage = pathname.includes("/employee") | ||
| const audioRef = useRef(null) as any | ||
|
|
||
| const playAudio = audioRef.current.play() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix critical issues with audio playback implementation
The current implementation has several issues:
play()returns a Promise that needs to be handled- Calling
play()during initialization may fail due to browser autoplay policies - No error handling for potential playback failures
- const playAudio = audioRef.current.play()
+ const playAudio = async () => {
+ try {
+ if (audioRef.current) {
+ await audioRef.current.play()
+ }
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to play audio:', error)
+ // Handle user interaction requirement or other playback errors
+ }
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const playAudio = audioRef.current.play() | |
| const playAudio = async () => { | |
| try { | |
| if (audioRef.current) { | |
| await audioRef.current.play() | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Failed to play audio:', error) | |
| // Handle user interaction requirement or other playback errors | |
| } | |
| } |
…manTech/HENO. into tech322/audio
public/images/Loading/loading.png
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I thought this change was implemented in a previous pull request.
public/images/Loading/m_loading.png
Outdated
No description provided.